Posted on 08/05/2016 6:52:51 AM PDT by econjack
Warren Buffet and also the useful idiots. I like to study the faces in the crowds behind Trump or Hillary. Speaks volumes.
Odd. Here’s another link to the same quote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/8050/watch-crowd-cheers-clintons-call-raise-taxes-robert-kraychik
Only if you believe it...I don’t listen to the MSM T.V. or radio, so if you are I can understand why your so confused....
Those black kids behind her in the sports uniforms do NOT look happy to be there.
Now if only Trump uses it in his campaign speeches and commercials over and over again!
I don’t think she ever took back that statement on raising middle class taxes. She is still using the answer to a question put to Trump that women should be punished for having abortions (a comment Trump took back within a couple hours).
And they cheered wildly......
“I wonder was Hillary “one brick short of a house””
More than one brick - and all affecting the “upper storey”.
Snopes is already saying that maybe the audio was bad and she said “aren’t” instead. Look for Hillary to use that defense. And, BTW, I wouldn’t trust Snopes as far as I could throw them. Snopes reports only their views on any issue and will purposely ignore countervailing information.
“..she would raise taxes on the middle class! ..”
A caller to a radio show said the crowd was applauding at EVERYTHING Hillary said, including raising taxes on the middle class! What dopey people.
1. He's only 59 years old.
2. He's got real executive-level government experience as Governor of Virginia.
3. He knows many of the people in Congress as a current sitting Senator.
4. He speaks Spanish fluently, which is important to reach Hispanic voters.
Too many people on both the political Left and Right are privately admitting Hillary Clinton does NOT look hale for a Presidential candidate. And the DNC very well knows they have to make the change to Kaine by the end of August 2016 (in case the worst case scenario happens) at the very latest to ensure he's on all 50 state ballots.
From here, this is the best site to get the most updated news there is, when you read the posts after you have read the article posted, you can then see what part is true and what part isn’t...
Why are you on here if you don’t do that?
Here's another scenario:
Copied from:
http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/2016/08/helter-skelter-theory-7.html
I had to take my vehicle to the mechanic the other day for service. The Service Manager, Pete, gave me a ride home and on the way he told me his theory about the upcoming election and the next four years of U.S. government. At first I thought it a bit far-fetched. But as I listened to him it began to make sense, scary sense...
“I believe that Hillary Clinton will win the election in November,” Pete began. “Then, sometime between November and January, Hillary will be indicted. The IRS is now investigating the Clinton Foundation and the whole e-mail thing isn’t over yet.”
“Once under indictment she won’t be able to assume the Office of the President in January. Tim Kaine, who will not actually be the Vice President because neither he nor Hillary have been inaugurated, cannot assume the Presidency.
The Speaker of the House can’t move up to it because there is already a sitting President and Vice President. So President Obama, in an Executive Order citing “emergency situation,” gives himself another four years in office is the only way possible.”
Pete believes Obama has been planning this for a while now, knowing he has enough on Hillary to indict her. Had the Attorney General indicted her based on evidence from the FBI this plan wouldn’t have worked because the DNC would have quickly come up with another candidate
If you think about it, it’s not that outrageous. Many people on the left, including the President, want Obama to stay another four years. The law prohibits him from being re-elected so the only ways he can do it is by declaring martial law and suspending the election (which would be a very negative thing for the country) or to declare himself still President because the elected candidate cannot assume her duties.
The latter makes more sense and is actually more feasible. And since it’s never been done before, it would set a precedent that would be difficult to challenge.
Of course, if Trump wins the election none of this is going to happen. But what if Pete is correct? Four more years of Obama and a mostly useless Republican House and Senate would give Obama the time he needs to continue destroying changing the country to fit his stated goals.
I thanked Pete for the ride home – and for messing up my day. Now I’ve got more things to worry about!
Is there a possibility that the Clintons are foreign agents? The manner of deaths of the Clinton adversaries or just those inconvenient to the Clintons suggests some degree of Intelligence Agency expertise.
I've dusted off my tinfoil hat again, as events are unraveling in such a manner that they would not be believable if written into a fiction novel.
Sure, Kaine has his downsides, but he's NOWHERE as bad as Hillary Clinton's downsides and the combination of only 59 years old and with real executive-level governmental experience gives him a real edge.
Yes! Trump should broadcast Hillary’s pledge to raise taxes — over and over again from sea to shining sea. When fritz Mondale said he’d raise taxes the voters turned his campaign off and defeated him.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=07m39CQRJXw
Hillary to Raise Taxes on Middle Class
Standing before am adoring crowd in Omaha on Monday,
Hillary Rodham Clinton read from her teleprompter and shouted:
“I’m telling you right now, we’re going to write fairer rules for the middle class, -- and we are going to RAISE TAXES on the middle class.”
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
