Posted on 08/24/2016 8:44:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange has accused Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of committing “extortion” by hyping fears over the possibility of a Republican victory in order to attract left-wing voters. Both Trump and Sanders supporters are waiting with bated breath for the next email dump from Julian Assange, the founder and editor in chief of Wikileaks. He released hacked emails last month showing Democratic National Committee officials plotting to defeat Mrs. Clinton’s chief rival, Vermont Sen. Bernard Sanders. Wikileaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange promised to release more damning emails about the Clinton Foundation, and warned he has enough evidence on Hillary Clinton making secret deals with an alleged Islamic State sponsor for the FBI to indict her. ”We have more info and we will publish everything when the time is right some of these materials can get Hillary Clinton to lose the nomination, will Bernie Sanders get the nomination as far as I know he is second in line and hold the remaining delegates if Clinton loses the nomination says Assange in his latest interview”.
Afshin Rattansi, a British journalist went underground with Russia Today to speak with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in London. About 32,000 emails from her private server have been leaked by Wikileaks so far, but Assange would not confirm the number of emails or when they are expected to be published. But he did say this:
Rattansi: If there is any illegality in the pending emails you will release or malfeasance in what you already released President Obama could presumably act on it and get Hillary Clinton charged? Regardless of whether you are about to release any email which would mean that James Comey and the FBI would have no alternative but to arrest Hillary Clinton?
Assange: Our view which we have already stated is if the evidence that the FBI has is enough for a grand jury to indict already… But a prosecutor has to ask a grand jury to indict. And if a prosecutor doesn’t ask, a grand jury won’t indict.But our next leak can bring her down because it is something that FBI can’t overlook!
Rattansi: When will be the date when you will release this leak?
Assange: I will not reveal the exact date but I can promise you this, I Will Bring Hillary Down Before The Debate Stage On September 26th.
This interview is very important because according to the rules Hillary can be removed as the Democratic nominee if Assange brings her down before the debate stage on September 26th and because the DNC rules are suspended than Bernie Sanders will replace her as you can read in a link below this article!
If the Hillary team has its way, you may not be around that much longer.
Can my interest in this overcome my distaste for Kelly? Dunno.
Agree. It seems thanks and gratitude are in order for James O’Keefe of Project Veritas for leading the way (and possibly inspiring Assange?) demonstrating the effectiveness of timed releases of information so the edtablishment mainstream media cannot bury the stories like they were previously able to do when the info was released all at once. The undercover Planned Parenthood videos are another example. New media providing the ability for us citozens to find & share the facts for all to see.
Tbe enemy never sleeps, but the truth remains.
He has nothing or he’d release it. That is the truth, and likely he’ll have nothing either ...
Take a look at the story by the Mirror.co.uk. August 23, 2016
“Ecuador Blasts British security forces after intruder scales walls of building housing Julian Assange, and police take two hours to respond.”
Hillary is Jezebel who is even worse than her husband Bill who is Ahab. (See 1 Kings 16-21 and 2 Kings 9 in the Bible.)
BTW, check out Jezebel’s prophesied end - it was not a happy one. I do not wish ill upon Hillary but I want her COMPLETELY OUT of power and influence in America. I’m not at all sure she will make it to the general election and I think if that happens, the DNC could even try for an Obama third term (couldn’t care less about the Constitution).
Are you saying that Tim Kaine has an open marriage, or were you speaking of the Clintons, which we all know about?
Not long ago I saw a copy of a tweet from Kaine (IIRC it was within the last couple of years, the tweet thing), saying that he and his wife had an open marriage so she could have other lovers, and it was fine with him. Paraphrasing.
I just searched and found a copy. Snopes says it isn’t real but snopes is full of crap. It should be easy for a technical person to determine if it is real or not.
A reason for that...Leadership of both the FBI and Republican party have failed to do their jobs. And failed miserably they have.
Not to mention the failure of the majority of media to do their job.
My theory: it’s much worse than Ms. Hill’s sexual preference, IMHO, Ms. Hill gave the stand down order at Benghazi.
Still don’t understand why Tre Gowdy never questioned under oath the Commander of the 6th Fleet. They had to be monitoring the situation at Benghazi, staeming at flank speed toward it and preparing an intervention. Just who told them to stand down and why didn’t Gowdy ask this key question? IMHO Obama/Clinton have information on Roberts, Comey and Gowdy that prevents them from behaving properly.
If they take him out everything will be released - hackers and hacking organizations have the info and it’s not hard to set up a code for an encrypted file (likely that file is all over the place). Killing him won’t stop the release.
I don’t trust Assange although I think his “rape” charge smells like politics and not justice (read about it for yourself). I can’t recall many “rapes” where the victim voluntarily hung out with and slept with the suspect again for days.
However, the drip drip drip is starting to work. The other news organizations can’t help themselves and the story is starting to get more play in the media. Being as objective as I can be, there is no way a reasonable person can examine the facts surrounding the corruption of the Clinton’s and not come away thinking she is guilty. She acknowledged the smoke today, but claimed there is no fire. The smoke is growing.
And yes, before anyone feels the need to tell me I know it won’t affect her 40% of devoted rats. However, it will impact the swing vote and it may even encourage the casual or non-participating voters to come out against her. This scandal WILL impact this election because she needs more votes than she has - a good number of votes. Hard to get those when people don’t trust you and the smoke is growing. She is still barely campaigning.
I am praying we are not fooled again!
Carter Ham had overall command. He (and many other commanders testified to the Gowdy and other committees. Lying to Congress is a felony, oath or not, and consequences even worse for military.
Rush was very disparaging to Assange on his show today. Doing everything he could to show him as anti-war, hard left, and part of the bitter invective against the Bush clan. His rape with no qualifiers toward him likely being innocent or set up,etc...
I am Neidermeyer and I approve of this message...
Yes! Your observation is spot on. I really believe that all this stuff we’re seeing here (Hillary’s health, Clinton Foundation) is a distraction from the real evil, which is: The command to let those brave souls die & pin it on an innocent videographer. I believe it was a command- not just an “innocent” screw-up.
Ballot access deadlines don’t really matter for Democrats.
Democrats and the Left in general have that luxury.Conservatives do not. For the Left the ship will take on some water. For Conservatives it will capsize.
It depends greatly on what type of “ailment” I would say.... the Presidency places enormous demands, mentally and physically, upon anyone in the office. Voters have every reason to require that candidates demonstrate great capacities for work, resilience, and stress resistence. Shrillarity may have had these attributes many years ago, but there is serious doubt about whether she is still up to the task.
I totally disagree and i do not think you have a pulse on demographics social attitudes. I am an extreme (conservative) and her Lesbian behavior has very little to do with why I oppose her. It does matter because I believe it effects the social breakdown of the society. But for swing voters? There is no way. Only 30% of republicans say it would effect their vote. If that is coming from the most conservative demographic then I highly doubt its a factor. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/215383-poll-30-percent-of-gop-say-sexual-orientation-of-candidate-mattters
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
