Wallace is confused about the immigration issue. She lays it out:
Build the Wall
No Amnesty
No Citizenship
No Sanctuary Cities
Commit a crime and you are out
Chris wants to know if 11 million gone immediately
She explains you simply need to enforce the law.
He will have none of that.
At least Tapper is letting Pence speak and lay out immigration to him.
I can’t watch motorboat Wall-a$$ anymore.
Thank you for doing it for us.
Hey Walice!
Why didn’t you criticize the BLM when they laid out these statistics about horrible conditions facing blacks? Trump just repeated them.
Walice freaking out about Trump going after “black-vote”.
Wallace reads questions like someone wrote them for him.
His follow up questions are typical leftist questions.
So on Meet the Press, now on cause Olympics are done....Reince Priebus is attempting to describe Trump’s immigration policy.
Priebus says Trump is going to be “human”, a word I translate as, possibly but I whisper, some form of amnesty.
So okay I been thinking about this. Last week I told the story of Beelow-guy who does my lawn from Ecuador, and his cute son Jaden or some such.
Now Beelow is an illegal, not sure how this son works out.
Once we get somebody elected who doesn’t think that never putting up a fence or vetting those who come into the country is how a country should be run, we are going to have to deal with the Beelows and Jadens of the country.
I am not convinced that sending Beelow and Jaden back to Ecuador solves anything. On the other hand, before screaming at me.....there’s got to be a way,.
How about this.....selective amnesty? Now in Beelows case he has a child born here in America so I don’t know how that works. But let us suppose that the new rule is round up EVERYBODY illegally here and send them home.
America would lose a good worker and law-abiding human in the form of Beelow. Not sure they could send his son away as he was born here in this country. And don’t tell me it was part of Beelow’s plan, this anchor baby thing. It probably was but nonetheless little Jaden was born in America through no fault of his own. Not sure deporting him is the fair thing. Then we get back to the argument about parents of anchor babies and so okay, it’s confusing.
Do NOT forget that WE allowed these people entry to our country, almost with open arms. Yes we should make it right but I am not sure that deporting Beelow, his wife probably and his American-born son is the way to go.
On the other hand, the Beelows of America need to know that they need to come forward, apply for citizenship, have no criminal activity on their record, then do whatever is decided to get legal citizenship, without deporting them.
anybody thinks we’re going to deport eleven million people, I got a bridge to sell.
BUT....but, but, but....if the Beelows of the world do not stand up and do what is required, ie come out of the shadow, apply for citizenship, pay taxes on their salary....THEN THEY ARE DEPORTED, along with their anchor babies, no questions, no doubts.
In other words, okay we did the stupid and let you in. But you’re either going to do it my way or take the highway.
I think Trump is struggling with this dilemma but guys, I think he has the answer.
Because there IS an answer.
No amnesty, no citizenship, no sanctuary cities.
But, but but, what about the 11 (??) million here illegally.
I conclude Chris does not understand the word illegal. Those folks are NOT US Citizens and some other Government is reponsible for these folks.
These folks do not get the benefits of US Citizenship, no job, no benies.
These folks can go back home. We’re busy taking care Citizens
First, there is a law that says they should be deported if they enter illegally. Second, the vast majority of them have committed multiple crimes, e.g., working illegally, evading taxes, ID theft, lying on federal employment forms (I-9), misuse of SSNs, etc. Many of these are felonies.
Trump is trying to walk back mass deportation, which is something none of us in the immigration movement have advocated. The open-borders, amnesty supporters like to offer the false choice of mass deportation or blanket amnesty. There are other alternatives, namely, attrition thru enforcement, which we have empirical data showing it works.
There is no comparison between Trump and Hillary on immigration. Someone needs to ask her some tough questions on her immigration policies. The MSM and some GOPe types would rather go after Trump on his "flip-flops." Hillary is very vulnerable on the immigration issue, especially as it affects American workers, especially low skill minorities.
She explains you simply need to enforce the law.
He will have none of that.
A pros pro showing Chrissy how you defuse a meme by sticking to the truth, and not being distracted into sound bite land.
Besides the following...
Build the Wall
No Amnesty
No Citizenship
No Sanctuary Cities
Commit a crime and you are out
...the debate seems to be what to do with the “good” ones. (employed, families, etc.)
Toss ‘em, or work with ‘em. ? I’d tend to work with ‘em, probably with a touchback or some sort of official documentation, so we know who and how many. This will be a massive, and difficult task....I don’t fault the Trump campaign for not knowing exactly how to do this.
Okay. So tell me exactly what that means. Deport as they are found, deport as they commit crimes minor or major or mass seek, roundup and deport?
All questions regarding immigration should be answered with
•
“What is it about enforcing the law you don’t understand?”