Posted on 09/07/2016 8:30:21 AM PDT by xzins
And the media say “OH, Ok thank you!”
If she wins, it will never be heard of again.
If she looses, there is always the “Retire to Switzerland” option.
The “Protected Class” will always be protected.
Yes, she would establish gulags where re-educaton would transpire.
Notice the word, “would”, not “will”.
Trump will prevail.
The USA will prevail.
“Questions With Her Foundation Will Be Answered AFTER Election”
Like her Benghazi debacle, “Just let me slither into office” but with the wrinkle, “then I can hit the re-set button from my ICU hospital bed.” and save her foundation from RICO.
Do you think that they realize she’ll “off with their heads”, too?
The Red Queen has no friends.
-PJ
Damm right she will! Who ever Trump appoints as Attorney General should resolve the extent of her crimes and put her away.
we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
If she loses, they should be subpoenaed. If she wins, God forbid, we’ll never hear about them again.
Well that’s ridiculous. This is key to voters knowing about her character. Trump won’t let her get away with it.
IOW, we’ll have to elect her and Bill to see what’s in it!................
It is vital that every fence-sitter vote for Trump. Not voting, voting for Johnson, etc isn’t good enough. Each vote for Trump takes one out of Hillary’s pocket.
We can’t afford to let this criminal anywhere near the Whitehouse. The very idea that criminal behavior doesn’t matter, or that conflicts of interest will be addressed once she’s already in power, these fly in the face of everything that this country was founded upon, and are insults to every American.
Another “O J Moment”.
OJ hasn’t answered questions yet about killing his wife...
Shrillary has even more baggage to clear up.
This woman cannot be President.
Hillary’s ethics: “We have to elect her to find out what’s in her.”
Right. Sure.
There is no conflict of interest question with Hillarys foundation:Hillary was, while holding an office of profit and trust under the US, a principal in an organization which accepted gifts from multiple foreign governments. She was obligated to get congressional approval for the acceptance of each such gift - but the House of Representatives was never consulted about any of those gifts. Under the Constitution, therefore, I have - every voter and official in America has - a duty to assume the worst about those gifts.
- Article 1 Section 9:
- No . . . person holding any office of profit or trust under [the US], shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state
There is no question about the ethics of the Clinton Foundation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.