CASE 1: A 0.05% defect rate, defect is definitely design related: no problem, nothing to worry about, the company should have zero responsibility.
CASE 2: A 0.0092% defect rate, with a solution already IN PLACE and replacements shipping for free: the company is terrible, you cannot trust them, unnamed sources say the fix is no good.
THAT is Swordmaker logic. THAT is hypocritical.
All your other postings are trying to cover that very, simple thing.
You support FUD - pure and simple. The point is very clearly laid out right here, case 1 and case 2. A higher rate, design-related defect from Apple is a non-issue in your words. A lower rate, supplier-related defect with a fix already in place, replacements being shipped from Samsung is a serious matter that means you should avoid them at all costs.
You're worse than Dan Rather.
Did you read it? I doubt it or you'd stop posting your drooling posts. Repeating your idiotic claims merely demonstrate your lack of intelligence.
Wrong.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 fiasco is keeping the company busy. Smartphones have been catching on fire, and about 0.1% of the sold handsets are said to be affected. That may seem like a small number, but Samsung is struggling to replace the 2.5 million units they have already sold. — Android Authority, September 17, 2016
Android Authority is hardly a non-ndroid authority on the subject, nor is it an Apple centric source. This percentage is apparently inclusive of overheating which damaged the Note 7 without starting a fire because the owners shut them down before they did so.
Can you post a reply with out insults or a faux psychological diagnosis of me? I shall join you. . I sincerely doubt it. It's inherent in your sick nature. . . asshat. You did not bother to read anything at all. . . or do the math I challenged you to do, did you? I think you are incapable of doing either.
Go have your fun elsewhere. I have more important thing to do.