Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shanghai Dan
CASE 2: A 0.0092% defect rate, with a solution already IN PLACE and replacements shipping for free: the company is terrible, you cannot trust them, unnamed sources say the fix is no good

Did you read it? I doubt it or you'd stop posting your drooling posts. Repeating your idiotic claims merely demonstrate your lack of intelligence.

Wrong.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 fiasco is keeping the company busy. Smartphones have been catching on fire, and about 0.1% of the sold handsets are said to be affected. That may seem like a small number, but Samsung is struggling to replace the 2.5 million units they have already sold. — Android Authority, September 17, 2016

Android Authority is hardly a non-ndroid authority on the subject, nor is it an Apple centric source. This percentage is apparently inclusive of overheating which damaged the Note 7 without starting a fire because the owners shut them down before they did so.

Can you post a reply with out insults or a faux psychological diagnosis of me? I shall join you. . I sincerely doubt it. It's inherent in your sick nature. . . asshat. You did not bother to read anything at all. . . or do the math I challenged you to do, did you? I think you are incapable of doing either.

Go have your fun elsewhere. I have more important thing to do.

126 posted on 09/18/2016 11:45:28 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
AND...

Now we lie. We go and find alternate, random sources to try to cover over our errors. Classic Swordmaker! Like I posted earlier, 92 out of 1 million. That's the failure rate. That's straight from Samsung, not an estimate from some random website. That's what is reported on Reuters, mainstream media.

So again - it's a much smaller failure rate. And the failure is already fixed, and replacements are shipping RIGHT NOW. For FREE. And those who do NOT want a free replacement have a software patch that SOLVES THE PROBLEM.

But, in Swordmaker's view, that's worthy of FUD. Condemnation. Ridicule.

Of course, when Apple has a failure an order of magnitude larger, for a phone that was shipping as late as LAST WEEK (yes, you could buy a brand new iPhone 6 and 6 Plus from Apple at least as of last week), that Apple REFUSES to acknowledge is a design flaw and insists that consumers have to pay for any fix - that's all well and good, and bringing it up is FUD.

That is hypocritical. Straight facts. You don't like it, because it's patently obvious.

One company owns their mistake, takes care of the customers in a matter of weeks, and the problem was just 92 out of 1 million. And it's OK to keep talking about the failures even though they are solved and replacements/fixes are 100% free.

The other company ignores the mistakes, blames the customers (you're carrying it wrong), and the problem affects 500 out of 1 million. And it's not OK to talk about the failures, especially as the company refuses to do anything about it.

The former is classic FUD. The latter is classic facts. But in your opinion, the former is all fine, and the latter is FUD.

That, is hypocrisy. Treatment is not equal. Why? Because you like one brand, and hate the other. Hypocrisy.

127 posted on 09/19/2016 8:15:25 AM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson