Skip to comments.
Dear FBI, This Is Intent: Hillary's "Oh [Crap]" Guy Sought Advice On How To "Strip VIP's Emails"
ZeroHedge ^
| 9/19/2016
| Tyler Durden
Posted on 09/19/2016 2:31:07 PM PDT by mojito
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Oh, what a tangled web we weave...
1
posted on
09/19/2016 2:31:08 PM PDT
by
mojito
To: mojito
2
posted on
09/19/2016 2:33:30 PM PDT
by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: mojito
3
posted on
09/19/2016 2:34:04 PM PDT
by
thinden
To: mojito
Forget it, Jake. It’s DC town.
4
posted on
09/19/2016 2:34:11 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: mojito
I don't believe the immunity deal includes lying to the FBI.
Of course, Comey has closed the case.
To: mojito
Someone pushed the guy - and offered protection. No one takes that risk on their own...
6
posted on
09/19/2016 2:40:27 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
("..unbridled ambition, greedy...with a husband still dicking bimbos at home"-Colin Powell on Clinton)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
That will be how they trash the immunity deal.
He’s done - although it’ll be a while. He’ll take a few down with him.
7
posted on
09/19/2016 2:40:39 PM PDT
by
Principled
(...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
To: mojito
I wonder whose name was to be the replacement?
8
posted on
09/19/2016 2:42:38 PM PDT
by
kevslisababy
(I am a Genuine Female: No after market parts.)
To: kevslisababy
9
posted on
09/19/2016 2:43:29 PM PDT
by
kevslisababy
(I am a Genuine Female: No after market parts.)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
I don't believe the immunity deal includes lying to the FBI. Right. Because neither James "Dirty Cop" Comey nor Loretta "Meet on on the Tarmac" Lynch would ever allow such a deal.
But the curious thing here, to me, is how Republicans are treating this matter. It's as if they're in on the fix, all protestations to the contrary. Congress has the ability to compel testimony. And this witness is not immune from giving testimony. He is immune from prosecution for the things he might say under oath.
The Fifth Amendment grants all of us immunity from self-incrimination. He has now waived ALL fifth Amendment immunity in regards to this matter, because his immunity from prosecution means it is no longer possible for him to incriminate himself. He needs to be called under threat of contempt, and told that he cannot refuse to testify. That's the law; why isn't it being enforced?
10
posted on
09/19/2016 2:46:44 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
To: mojito
11
posted on
09/19/2016 2:47:33 PM PDT
by
newfreep
("If Lyin' Ted was an American citizen, he would be a traitor.")
To: thinden
It just hit US News & World Report. Sourced and timelined.
It’s not a Trump Train, but there’s some traction.
12
posted on
09/19/2016 2:55:37 PM PDT
by
Dr.Deth
To: FredZarguna
But the curious thing here, to me, is how Republicans are treating this matter. It's as if they're in on the fix, all protestations to the contrary. Congress has the ability to compel testimony. And this witness is not immune from giving testimony. He is immune from prosecution for the things he might say under oath. I think the GOP is unsure of how to do anything. They seem to be just as scared of a Trump administration as a Clinton administration.
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
Ed Kline claims Comey has let it be known he wants his name on the new FBI building when its constructed. No wonder he refused to recommend prosecution of Hillary.
14
posted on
09/19/2016 2:56:58 PM PDT
by
FrdmLvr
("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in)
To: mojito
Immunity is granted on condition of cooperation. If cooperation is shown to be compromised, immunity can be withdrawn.
To: mojito
The Fraudulent Bureau of Investigation and Mr. Comey have lost ALL credibility. They are an organ of the DNC and nothing more. Any member who has not resigned in protest by now is too far gone for redemption.
16
posted on
09/19/2016 2:58:26 PM PDT
by
AmusedBystander
(The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
To: FredZarguna
He needs to be called under threat of contempt, and told that he cannot refuse to testify. That's the law; why isn't it being enforced?
The rule of law is long gone. The UniParty rules now and exposing Hillary's treason now would be very inconvenient for them.
17
posted on
09/19/2016 2:59:11 PM PDT
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
No leadership. No decisive strong man in either house.
18
posted on
09/19/2016 2:59:33 PM PDT
by
monkeywrench
(Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that rmemoveth his neighbor's landmark)
To: mojito
Comey knows what intent is and he wasn’t looking for it.
The law he was referring to doesn’t require intent to be in violation.
Director Comey is bought and paid for not confused by laws or legal terms.
19
posted on
09/19/2016 3:04:53 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(~Questionable Hillary thinks Putin made me post this!~)
To: mojito
That looks like intent to me.
20
posted on
09/19/2016 4:14:22 PM PDT
by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson