Skip to comments.
New USGS study shows heat retaining concrete and asphalt have encroached upon US Climate Stations
Watts Up with That? ^
| September 22, 2016
| By Anthony Watts
Posted on 09/22/2016 7:13:02 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Brad from Tennessee
Duh, everyone knew that years ago.
2
posted on
09/22/2016 7:14:23 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: VTenigma
That’s what I thought.
This was exposed years ago.
3
posted on
09/22/2016 7:16:15 PM PDT
by
2111USMC
(Aim Small Miss Small)
To: Brad from Tennessee
How did this administration ever let that report out?
It unsettles the settled science.
Heresy.
To: Brad from Tennessee
It took two government paid scientists to figure out that a thermometer above a concrete slab may not be completely accurate.
5
posted on
09/22/2016 7:17:05 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Brad from Tennessee
Now add in the fact we know they placed temp sensors in some very awful places, like next to heat exchangers and next to exhaust vents and such, and you can see how the “data” has been deliberately manipulated.
6
posted on
09/22/2016 7:17:33 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Just stand on asphalt in the summer
7
posted on
09/22/2016 7:17:33 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(She is evil, corrupt, and brain damaged.)
To: 2111USMC
This little known fact is kept little known.
8
posted on
09/22/2016 7:18:00 PM PDT
by
T-Bone Texan
(Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
To: Brad from Tennessee
9
posted on
09/22/2016 7:29:15 PM PDT
by
BuffaloJack
(Own a rifle. Be an American.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Gee..., the "Brains" FINALLY wake up to the fact that if your data recording location has become surrounded by asphalt and concrete (Heat Island)..., perhaps...., your data is flawed! Garbage in Garbage Out! There is NO positive correlation between education and common-sense (of course this has been known for EONS!)
10
posted on
09/22/2016 7:30:39 PM PDT
by
ExSES
(the "bottom-line")
To: Brad from Tennessee
Not only that, those blokes purposely put those sensors in unusually hot places.
11
posted on
09/22/2016 7:38:16 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Brad from Tennessee
It used to be adjusted for in the datasets.
To: <1/1,000,000th%
Makes sense to me. In the city you can feel more heat radiating from the ground than you do in the country, and you will see all the small front lawns surrounded by concrete all brown in the summer, but drive out to the country and you’ll see the front 3-5 acre lawns looking pretty good that same time of year
13
posted on
09/22/2016 7:49:36 PM PDT
by
inchworm
To: Brad from Tennessee
everything the gubbint touches it wrecks
14
posted on
09/22/2016 7:49:51 PM PDT
by
vooch
To: SpaceBar
School children understand that.
15
posted on
09/22/2016 7:51:08 PM PDT
by
ully2
To: Brad from Tennessee
"Wotta ya mean I shouldn't put it up here on the roof? It's easy to get here and the view is great. I think we'll just leave it here. Besides, it can't make that much of a difference."
To: Brad from Tennessee
17
posted on
09/22/2016 7:51:19 PM PDT
by
Gideon7
To: Brad from Tennessee
18
posted on
09/22/2016 7:54:01 PM PDT
by
Gideon7
To: Pearls Before Swine
How does “adjustment” even happen without a quintessential begging of the question (i.e. no solution to the set of equations)?
19
posted on
09/22/2016 8:01:48 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
I believe there are many other factors as well...
One I recall right off the bat - there are standards for construction of a station, including what to paint it with.
The standard was oil-based paint, and the standard was changed at some point to latex paint. Turns out that change has a heat effect change as well... and, naturally, in the direction you’d expect if you wanted your stations to report higher temperatures over time. The phase-in of the paint change was gradual, as stations needed new coats of paint, or new stations get worked into the system, thus the overall increase in temperature was moderated (easier to hide, and portray as the glowbull warming they wanted).
20
posted on
09/22/2016 8:05:45 PM PDT
by
C210N
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson