Giuliani was insistent that Holt had no idea what he was talking about and purposely twisted the whole SAF issue to benefit Clinton.
100%
Holt the Dolt.
“Fact checking” has become a euphemism for Democrat spin.
I thought it was also known as a Terry Stop, which was found constitutional in 1968.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop
Holt was as biased as biased can get.
Trump should have used LAW & ORDER as a bridge theme to get to the point that Hillary is not SUBJECT TO LAWS!
In Fact the Arab Spring should have been cited as the pinnacle of an ANTI-L&W candidate in creating chaos, mayhem, bloodlust, rape and plunder in the ME and continuing this perverse fetish here in the USA with SOROS.
Yes and no. The district court judge ruled that it was, but district courts are not the final word on whether something is constitutional or not. The city appealed and requested a new judge, which was granted. But when de Blasio was elected the city dropped its appeal so the case never went any further.
Giuliani should personally pressure Lester Holt to issue and apology. I’ll hold my breath waiting....
A Democrat Media shill (Lester Holt) does a phony fact-check on a Republican candidate?
Why am I not surprised?
Vote Trump!
I will keep posting this idea: Trump should be able to have a moderator moderate the moderators. That would be fair since they are all democrats. That way if the moderators involve themselves in any way....whether by inserting their OPINIONS in their QUESTIONS or by NOT asking the same hard question to Hillary...then the moderator of the moderator jumps in JUST AS A JUDGE does in court and says OBJECTION!!!!!
PLEASE pass this idea on to Mr. Trump if you have connections. THANK YOU!