| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 11/17/2016 1:03:48 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 11/17/2016 11:03:09 AM PST by ThinkingBuddha
Retailers have begun ditching Ivanka's brand under the growing pressure of the anti-Trump boycott.
Shoes.com, a Canadian online shoe store, became the first retailer to announce it was dropping Ivanka Trump's shoe line last week, following the GrabYourWallet campaign....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Look up the ‘Duck Commanders’ site and mention to him...
Thinking that Donald’s son would be a great fellow to sponsor that one.
Boycotting shoes.com
Any others?
Mention it to him then...
Leftists don’t have the self discipline for a boycott. We are gonna beat them again!
What’s his hashtag?
I have an Ivanka Trump piece. I think I’ll wear it tomorrow.
The “GrabYourWallet” campaign.
Go ahead, grab your wallets and do your worst.
That’s far better than the commie / globalist “Kiss Your Country Goodbye” campaign we were getting primed for.
Are they ditching it because they are upset that their national socialism promoting candidate lost the election and they are also anti-Semites who are boycotting her because she is a convert Jew - i.e. http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Ivanka-Trump-and-Shabbat-Pure-family-time-472181? Or because of her father? I think the latter. But I find it ironic how the media has been trying to paint her father as being anti-Semite but the reality is that his own daughter and 3 of his grandchildren are Jews.
And just to be clear, the reason why I don’t want to see Donald Trump’s Jewish son-in-law working in the White House is because of nepotism and not because he is a Jew. I would be personally just fine with Trump loading up his team with Jews, as long as they will uphold and defend the Constitution & especially protect the Bill of Rights and remember that its a government of the people & union of the states, not the other way around.
??? I don’t run in that circle...sorry, I run in the biker group...
Me thinks this won’t make a dent in her business.
On 60 Minutes Trump was asked if his presidential run has been good for the Trump brand. His answer: Who cares? This is much more important.
She's very smart, very industrious, appears to be a lovely person ... and yes has a nice sense of style.
However I hope her naive child care project gets nowhere. We don't need what amounts to more taxpayer subsidy of so-called daycare. What I call daycare culture was imposed on us by '60 feminists -- the same Leftist harpies who brought us virtually unregulated abortion throughout nine months of pregnancy.
Daycare culture is responsible for the alienation of children from their parents and our traditional culture -- it is one of the root causes of many social ills, such as the terrible heroin problem amongst our young people today.
Better to support tax advantages for mothers who choose to stay home with their children. And for parents who homeschool their children.
At shoes.com, “Ivanka Trump” appears in the auto-populated search text box, but no Ivanka Trump products appear in search results.
A browse down the path of women’s brands shows no Trump brands.
You can send them a note. I did. Be polite.
http://www.shoes.com/Info/Contact
“She’s already a multi-millionairess. You’re not really hurting her.”
That was a very calloused post...or do you really think having money means one doesn’t have feelings? Rethink that one...
They’re still confusing candidate Trump with President Trump who will have the power of the presidency. Keep it up snowflakes.
I am always good for a boycott.
Exactly. If the retailers decide to shaft her, she would do well to go over their heads direct to We the People.
Where did I say anything about “feelings?” Rethink your post.
LOL!
Does she have any good boots I can wear on my Harley?
I tend to fall off of high heels.
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.