Posted on 12/01/2016 7:41:15 AM PST by Kaslin
Why did Hillary Clinton join Jill Stein, the Green Party’s oddball presidential nominee, in asking for a recount of the votes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania when everyone knows that such a recount won’t change the outcome of the 2016 election?
Part of the answer is that people close to Hillary—Huma Abedin, Chelsea Clinton, and Sidney Blumenthal—encouraged her to ask for a recount as a way of lifting her spirits.
“She is weepy, looks ten years older and is very whiny,” said one of Hillary’s closest friends. “She has been drinking wine pretty heavily, much more than usual. She mopes around all day, swimming in a sea of recriminations and complaining that her campaign managers were ‘incompetent,’ Bill and Chelsea ‘didn’t work hard enough,’ FBI Director Comey was ‘in league with Trump.’”
In addition, President Obama convinced Hillary that it was in the best interest of the Democratic Party if the Clinton legal team got involved with the recount and didn’t leave it to Jill Stein.
“The president felt that the progressives were acting stunned and helpless and had to rise out of their stupor and show that they weren’t going to take their defeat lying down,” said the source. “Contesting the results of the election was the best and fastest way to stir the morale and fighting spirit of the demoralized party.
“Obama felt that a recount would plant a seed with the base that the election was somehow dishonest,” the source continued. “He wanted to raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the Trump presidency.”
And what did Bill Clinton—the man Charlie Rose called “the best political animal that’s ever been in American politics”—think of all this?
Said a close Clinton adviser: “Bill thinks the recount is going to backfire as a strategy because there are probably no more than a handful of questionable ballots and they could actually wind up adding to Trump’s numbers and validate rather than invalidate his election.”
You’re right. He’s a Blithe. Hillary’s a Rodham. Chelsea’s a Hubbell. Put ‘em all together and you’ve got the crime syndicate known as the Clintons.
One reason this gambit will backfire is that it give lots of ammunition and talking points to the effort to enact ballot security measures like: voter ID; cleaning up the voter rolls; voting machine security; amendment or repeal of "motor voter"; and others.
In other words, it's bad for Democrats and good for Republicans.
Astute observation.
Other than giving nukes to the Norks and refusing to accept bin Laden handed over on a silver platter? That’s just for starters.
Fortunately, Newt took over after the 1994 election and was provided a Republican congress. The first two years of Clinton were unmitigated disaster.
I suspect, however, you would be right about Bill being a better president than Hill, if I really had to choose. It would be sort of like deciding whether you’d rather be thrown off the roof or the thirteenth floor.
I think the real reason for all the recounts is for the Dems to find out HOW many votes they lost by & WHERE. They didn’t do enough cheating to win, so they have to refine their game plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.