Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If the car is on the way to the snackbar, all bets are off.

1 posted on 01/18/2017 10:09:45 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: fishtank

Or your vehicle’s wifi system or whatever system has a hick up, and there is no control of your self driving vehicle.

You are in your back seat with the car heading into an on coming semi truck, or into the back of a semi carrying telephone poles extending 15’ past the rear of the semi, or into a pack of Trump haters protesting several years of Trump being president.

Do I have a choice or have to ride it out.

Could I program it to hit the old Trump protesters?


36 posted on 01/18/2017 10:29:46 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The deadliest Islamic terror cell America has ever faced is leaving office, 20 Jan 2017!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

These are the sort of false hypothetical that the left creates all the time to promote regulations.

It is easy to create silly hypotheticals to push for any regulation you want.


38 posted on 01/18/2017 10:32:32 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

This is a silly hypothetical. Chances of it happening are almost nil.

Personally, I’m not holding my breath waiting for autonomous cars to take over the roads. The best technology currently out there requires a huge array of sensors to be able to navigate safely, and still have problems if visibility is limited (especially if the sensors are obscured by snow and ice).

When you hear people saying that self-driving cars would be more feasible if the lines on the road were painted better, you know the technology is not ready for prime time. If it isn’t at least capable of handling the same variety of conditions and situations as an average human driver (and the average driver is not very good, and they still have no problem figuring out where the road goes if the lines are a bit sketchy), then it’s not ready for the road.

But yeah, when it does come, we probably won’t own the cars anymore. They’ll be too complicated and expensive, with serious maintenance requirements, and liability concerns, that only corporations or maybe public utilities will be able to operate them.

That is, unless someone manages to produce real AI sometime in the next couple of years - AI that can really understand what it is seeing, rather than just running mindless algorithms.


39 posted on 01/18/2017 10:32:48 AM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Technology is never a substitute for good management (decision making).


40 posted on 01/18/2017 10:33:12 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Self-Driving Cars - Just another public transportation system.


45 posted on 01/18/2017 10:37:22 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

If it’s programmed by the far left tech companies, it will automatically go after the white pedestrians first, lol.


50 posted on 01/18/2017 10:42:03 AM PST by angelrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

I’m still waiting for the FLYING JETSON CARS like they were
showing on cartoons when I was a kid. Heck. What I have
now is more like Fred Flintstone’s car with the rock
wheels that we have to use foot power to move it along the
road.


51 posted on 01/18/2017 10:43:30 AM PST by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The purpose of self driving cars is to take away your freedom of movement.


53 posted on 01/18/2017 10:43:52 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

I was a math-and-science nerd growing up.

I am currently writing a science fiction novel.

I think self-driving cars (so called) are an absurdly reckless idea that only disconnected tech geeks could conjure.

(I already hate electric cars: I have nearly been run over by the silent little monsters more than once.)


58 posted on 01/18/2017 10:45:46 AM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

” How would it decide?”

It would have slowed down and braked.


60 posted on 01/18/2017 10:47:28 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

How many like Windows 10 controlling your computer? I am not in control of my computer anymore. Getting used to it I guess...........................


66 posted on 01/18/2017 10:52:07 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

1) Reprogram the Kobayashi Maru scenario so that you win.
2) Eject the passengers forward out of the car and use them as breaks.
3) Aim for any solid barrier.
4) Turn harder.
5) Calculate the damage if brakes were to fail and slow down before hand.
6) Aim for the jihadist.
7) Aim for the woman in the burka, because she’s probably a jihadist in disguise.
8) Turn off the engine.
9) Apply parking brake.
10) Reverse gears.
11) Attempt 180.
12) Lift off. Hey, if it’s smart enough to determine the age of the people on the right or left, and that the woman on the left has a baby carriage, then it probably has rocket boosters.


75 posted on 01/18/2017 11:07:19 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

It determines if the people are White Christian Males, muzzies, Blacks, gays, L, G, B or T, and mows down the White Christian Males.


78 posted on 01/18/2017 11:16:27 AM PST by I want the USA back (Yay Trump! Fuck You Bammy! We're so sick of you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Of course part of the point of self driving cars is that they “think” faster than humans and aren’t as easily distracted and thus “notice” that situation well in advance and stop the car without killing anybody.


82 posted on 01/18/2017 11:28:40 AM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

.
As if we needed another reason why self driving vehicles should be prohibited.
.


84 posted on 01/18/2017 11:29:56 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The judgement is easy - preserve the passengers.
They paid for the car or for the ride. They get first consideration when it comes to safety.
Alternately, self driving cars will be programmed to make the choice that creates least liability for the software company and, possibly, its customers.
On the plus side, the auto-driving software should have faster reactions and be in compliance with the speed limit, making it easier to avoid the situation in the first place.


94 posted on 01/18/2017 1:02:12 PM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Aside from the Elite who want to force these cars and more control on the rest of us, is there anyone or any market for a self driving car?


104 posted on 03/11/2017 2:36:04 AM PST by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson