Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supreme Court: A Modest Proposal
American Thinker ^ | April 13, 2017 | Dennis Lund

Posted on 04/13/2017 11:42:12 AM PDT by Michael.SF.

Once again the nation has suffered through the process of a Supreme Court nomination. Having done so, we can now either sit back and wait in dread for the next one, or we can consider modification of probably the most divisive process in politics, save for presidential elections.

As much as I approve of the results attained by McConnell’s actions, I am also of the opinion that this is not a process that can continue...

Not only have they awakened, they have won.

The Democrats will not take this well.

Given the above the following is offered for consideration:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: confederatecarpetbag

Dittos to what you said. In fact, that reminds me. I want to send Dingy Harry Reid a “Thank You” note.


21 posted on 04/13/2017 1:14:03 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey Snowflakes! You can't impeach the President of the United States because he makes you feel sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

If we are going to all sit around and talk about how well the game should be played, we may as well concede and not bother to play at all. Losers talk about how well the game was played winners talk about the score. The only reason to modify the SCOTUS procedure is to rig it in our favor.


22 posted on 04/13/2017 1:22:47 PM PDT by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects; starve the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinidon

That works too.


23 posted on 04/13/2017 1:35:44 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

The Constitution makes all Federal judges/justices lifetime appointments. To create a mechanism to force them “to leave active service” would require changing the Constitution, that is amending it. In addition, changing the required Senate majority to confirm judges would also require amending the Constitution.


24 posted on 04/13/2017 2:08:36 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Amen to that!
Only strict constructionists should ever be confirmed, which was originally intended. Then political entanglements and bias would not matter.
Is that possible? Doubtful.
That would imply/require principals, largely lacking in today’s pool of judges.
An example might be a flaming liberal judge voting against precedent because strict reading of the Constitution flies in the face of the original ruling (e.g. Roe V Wade).
When Pigs fly.....


25 posted on 04/13/2017 3:30:35 PM PDT by blues-train (blues train)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

You said it all!


26 posted on 04/13/2017 4:08:01 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
old farts who have no business even dressing themselves in the morning


This Judge wore speedos under that black robe, nothing else. 😇
27 posted on 04/13/2017 4:32:30 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

Obviously.


28 posted on 04/13/2017 6:46:47 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which ‘liberalism’ coheres is that NOTHING ACTUALLY MATTERS except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg
Losers talk about how well the game was played

My old HS coach put it this way (after a tough loss (at the Colosseum) to Pat Haden's Bishop Amat): "ONLY LOSERS COMPLAIN ABOUT THE OFFICIATING"

Regarding "rigging it in our favor": Right now we have the upper hand. someday we won't. I think this change will help prevent Dems from rigging it in their favor.

29 posted on 04/18/2017 2:03:46 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Women who are 25 pounds overweight tend to live longer than the men who mention it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson