Posted on 04/24/2017 2:12:25 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain
We are living inside a Universe that’s so complex that if we can grasp what’s happening for a moment, we’ll fall down on our knees and cry in surrender to its marvelous beauty!
Science just barely starts to scratch the surface to the nature of reality and still, its discoveries are more shocking than we were able to imagine. It proves of quantum entanglement, unified field of consciousness, free energy, superhuman abilities, singularity, parallel universes and alternate realities.
All of this is so mind boggling that you would never think a kid can understand. But maybe we need a kid, someone who is brave enough to think about crazy ideas and theories because most of the world we live in today was built upon such.
Max Laughlin is not just any kid. He is probably the smartest kid in the world. When he had only 13 years he invented a Free Energy Device, something that could potentially power the whole world for free. He became famous across the world for his brilliant ideas and points of view on interesting topics like the nature of The Universe and Alternate Realities.
But now he has a theory that CERN destroyed our Universe and we live in another Universe that was parallel and closest to it. He thinks the famous Mandela Effect is a result of that. Max explains it all beautifully in this video:
(Excerpt) Read more at lifecoachcode.com ...
You brought up “conspiracy.” I haven’t mentioned it.
I have seen video of the collapse of WTC #7. It is a perfect controlled demolition.
Please note: I haven’t engaged in any speculation.
What is YOUR explanation for the fact that the collapse is perfectly symmetrical?
I have two degrees in philosophy. You do not know the meaning of “begging the question.”
I did not put out premises—and I did not reach a conclusion.
I told you what the video SHOWS.
The video SHOWS a perfect controlled demolition.
Since the video SHOWS a controlled demolition, the burden of proof is on anyone who claims there was no controlled demolition.
Start at 10::00
Explain how the controlled demolition shown in the video is not a controlled demolition.
Please note that I have not mentioned any theories.
Let’s see if you are capable of responding without irrelevancies or personal abuse.
Start at 10::00
Explain how the controlled demolition shown in the video is not a controlled demolition.
Please note that I have not mentioned any theories.
Let’s see if you are capable of responding without irrelevancies or personal abuse.
:)
In the New Universe, some of them are detachable.
Send an email to WorldsSmartestGeniusBoy@UnifiedFieldOfConsciousness.net for details.
The video SHOWS a building coming down; it does not SHOW the cause. Attributing a specific cause as the result of an effect is nothing more than superstition.
The video does not SHOW anything of the kind. It shows a building coming down. The burden of proof remains on the person who posits the cause with nothing more than an appearance.
Yes, you have. You have shown an effect, and posited a theory for the cause. No one has an burden of proof but you.
Your statement is tantamount to a preposterous claim like: "A video of rains SHOWS that it falls vertically. Prove that it is not caused by angels riding down the raindrops to keep them on the straight and narrow."
In fact, not even the premise is correct: rain may appear to fall vertically, but it doesn't: it falls toward the center of the Earth.
Garbage in...garbage out. I have an overwhelming urge for my parallel universe to crash into his so I can snatch the cocktail napkin, throw it in a garbage disposal and wait for the Droste effect to take place..
You can’t even formulate a reasonable analogy.
If you could SEE the angels in the video, THEN your analogy would make some sense.
The video SHOWS a controlled demolition. Anyone who claims the video does not show a controlled demolition needs to explain why WTC #7 is the only building in the history of the universe to collapse in that precise manner WITHOUT precisely placed, precisely timed explosive charges.
You have convinced yourself that this is a controlled demolition because a collection of anti-American kooks have made some unsupported statements on YouTube.
In fact, the North Tower of the WTC came down in almost identical fashion to WTC 7. The only difference owes to the fact that the plane collision produced a great deal of fire and smoke in the top floors of the structure. [For floors below the 70th floor, the South Tower also falls straight down.]
Your idiotic theory has been debunked by actual engineers and scientists: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
I understand that you're a mystic, and believe in a great deal of nonsense, but this particular bit of nonsense is unworthy of any discussion.
Very interesting kid! I sent this on to Nelson too.
You have not even attempted to explain why WTC #7 is the only building in the history of the universe to collapse IN THAT MANNER without the involvement of demolitionists.
I am amused that you “know” that the people who made the video are “kooks” and that they are “unAmerican.” What branch of physics informed you that they are “unAmerican kooks.”
Thanks for demonstrating to all the third parties reading this that you’ve got nothing.
I gave you a link that thoroughly debunks you and your kook buddies. Read it.
I’ve noticed that my pants fit a bit snugger in this one.
Here's the other thing. This kid isn't talking about theoretical physics. He's just trying to wrap his head around infinity, and a God who has no beginning and no end.
If our universe was destroyed, then there is no longer an infinite number of universes.
I have read it, and articles debunking it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.