Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Donald Trump Decided to Back Off Nafta Threat
Wall Street Journal ^ | April 27, 2017 | Peter.Nicholas, Paul Vieira and José de Córdoba

Posted on 04/28/2017 6:38:44 AM PDT by reaganaut1

President Donald Trump was prepared to end the North American Free Trade Agreement deal, which had governed trade relations for the past 23 years, with a dramatic announcement Saturday at a Pennsylvania political rally marking his 100th day in office.

As rumors spread of the possible action, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto called the president urging him not to pull out of the accord. “Let me think about it,” Mr. Trump said. Within a half hour a call came in from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with a similar request.

After the talks, Mr. Trump was convinced “they’re serious about it and I will negotiate rather than terminate,” the president said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Thursday.

Meanwhile, Sonny Perdue—the agriculture secretary who took office two days earlier—and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross met with Mr. Trump and showed him a map indicating the states where jobs would be lost if the pact collapsed, according to a person familiar with the matter. Many were farm and border states that voted heavily for Mr. Trump.

Those conversations, along with a flood of calls to the White House from business executives, helped steer Mr. Trump away from an idea that some of his own advisers feared was a rash and unnecessary threat to two trading partners who fully expected to renegotiate the agreement anyway.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nafta; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
As the article states, lots of jobs will be lost if we exit trade agreements. I'm glad Trump listened.
1 posted on 04/28/2017 6:38:44 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Globalists don’t back out of nafta.


2 posted on 04/28/2017 6:42:01 AM PDT by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Amazing how just the threat of action, gets results.


3 posted on 04/28/2017 6:42:22 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Rudy Guiuliani for Head of FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

As I recall, Trump repeatedly said NAFTA was a bad deal. He didn’t say “ no deal, “ EVER. If these guys renegotiate to our benefit, we win. That’s what I want, that’s what Trump promised.


4 posted on 04/28/2017 6:44:37 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Wall Street Journal has gone full WP/NYT.

So who am I going to believe?

Trump’s version, Canada and Mexico are going to sit down and renegotiate, or The WSJ Trump backed down?

Sorry WSJ, there was a time when I respected your organization.

That ended quite some time ago.

You decided to go full on Leftist, so don’t blame me.


5 posted on 04/28/2017 6:48:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Thanks for the reminder......plus the fact that Trump is a great negotiator means we’ll win...... again.


6 posted on 04/28/2017 6:48:06 AM PDT by Liz (Shutting down conservatives' free speech is a form of hate speech. samthemn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Good, so now Trump renegotiates it from a stronger position.


7 posted on 04/28/2017 6:48:55 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The No-Wall Street Urinal cannot be trusted. NAFTA is a disaster and has cost the USA 1,000 of factories and decimated the USA's industrial base.

WSJ and other globalists throw Americans under the bus like cannon fodder.

8 posted on 04/28/2017 6:49:48 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

He said renegotiate not back out.


9 posted on 04/28/2017 6:49:55 AM PDT by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

A lot of people need to learn how Trump makes a deal.

Republican method:
1) Start with compromise position (to appeal to Ds)
2) Negotiate down to position Ds want as media calls the compromised position “extreme”.

Democrat method:
1) Start with extreme position
2) Don’t give an inch while media clobbers Rs for not accepting it

Trump method:
1) Start with extreme position
2) Negotiate down to what you want as media focuses on extreme position and is unwilling to recognize/report that “the dictator” is willing to negotiation/compromise


10 posted on 04/28/2017 6:50:58 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Alexander Hamilton: ‘Not only the wealth, but the independence and security of a country, appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufactures. Every nation...ought to endeavor to posses within itself all the essentials of a national supply. These comprise the means of subsistence, habitation, clothing and defense. ‘ America’s political independence, Hamilton was saying, could not survive without economic independence. “

-- Pat Buchanan

11 posted on 04/28/2017 6:53:23 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
At this point anyone that supports the status quo regarding trade is not unlike a rapist holding down their victim and telling them to relax and enjoy. I put the WSJ editorial staff in that category. Economic rapists.
12 posted on 04/28/2017 6:58:36 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

For the (World) Street Journal globalism takes precedence over reasonable analysis.


13 posted on 04/28/2017 7:00:17 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The General has a strategy and he’s probing. Of course that’s lost on the idiot press.


14 posted on 04/28/2017 7:02:52 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Many were farm and border states that voted heavily for Mr. Trump.

Maybe the same senior advisors could have done a similar analysis of the impacts and benefits of the softwood lumber tariff that was just imposed on Canadian lumber. The biggest beneficiaries of this tariff will be U.S. lumber producers in Washington and Oregon ... two states which did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016.

15 posted on 04/28/2017 7:03:30 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
As I recall, Trump repeatedly said NAFTA was a bad deal. He didn’t say “ no deal, “ EVER. If these guys renegotiate to our benefit, we win. That’s what I want, that’s what Trump promised.

Exactly! I remember him repeatedly saying he would renegotiate NAFTA for a better deal!

16 posted on 04/28/2017 7:05:08 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The biggest beneficiaries of this tariff will be U.S. lumber producers in Washington and Oregon ... two states which did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016.

I see keeping American's working as an apolitical issue. Only a really f upped individual like yourself would use this issue as political football. Do you think timber people are Democrats?

17 posted on 04/28/2017 7:06:28 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Maybe I’ve missed some of Trump’s statements on NAFTA, but what I remember from a year and a-half of campaigning is several statements that he planned to renegotiate NAFTA, not end it. I think any talk of ending it is fairly recent in the almost twenty month period involved.

This does sound like a negotiating tactic, not the cave in or “back off” the WSJ is portraying here.


18 posted on 04/28/2017 7:06:33 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The idiots know nothing about negotiation. We all knew what he was doing, but the poor morons in the media didn’t have a clue.

Politicians and media have no experience with how a successful businessman conducts business. By the was just so those who have their panties in a twist over this, do they really think Mexico and Canada would stop doing business with the US just because that bad deal for America is scrapped


19 posted on 04/28/2017 7:07:06 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

I am for whatever makes the WSJ editorial staff unhappy.


20 posted on 04/28/2017 7:07:40 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson