Posted on 06/21/2017 8:46:16 PM PDT by WilliamIII
Dr Robert McClelland held JFK's head as he was operated on after being shot
He drew a sketch based on what he saw that said the bullets came from the front
McClelland later decided Kennedy was shot from in front and behind
He believes the second gunman must have been on the infamous 'grassy knoll'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
These wounds - which he says he didn’t see himself - correspond with the two wounds he observed.
Do you believe your ridiculous statements?
I agree. To suggest otherwise just gives the dims all the justification they need to make good on their rhetoric regarding Trump.
And in the light of the current political environment; JFK wouldn’t be considered left enough, and would also be a target of the dims.
Indeed. All of this conspiracy mania was started by leftists who simply could not accept that their hero got clipped by one of their own. Anyone interested should read Vincent Bugliosi’s massive book on the subject. He incinerates the conspiracy theorists in a nuclear fireball of logic and facts.
I've just requested that my own comment #9, which quoted comment #2, likewise be pulled.
There is nonway he was shot from bebind.
Its physics ...
Eisenhower was the time to turn things around after 2 decades of Deep State/Communist-Soviet capture of the federal government. He didn’t do jack squat, serving as the template for the Socialist Republican Do-Nothings ever since, letting the Dems ram through their Marxist/Stalinist agenda and arguing that the GOP was best suited to run their programs (witness that nothing the Dems have implemented since after 1932 has been curtailed, even ZeroCare, and the GOP ain’t interested particularly in repealing that).
No President (before Trump) has truly rolled back the size and scope of government since Harding/Coolidge. Even Reagan couldn’t do it.
See my post 15. Explain the 2 identical/scenarios now very well known, plots before Dallas.
Did you look at the diagram?
Understood.
I am reading it now.
Still early, but I am losing a bit of respect for Bugliosi, a man I have respected for a long time.
Example: Oswald was broke, and working a minimum wage job, but the last time he saw his wife he gave her $1,300 (in today's dollars). Where did that money come from?
Second Example: Oswald also had $100.00 on him when arrested (again in today's dollars). Where did that come from?
If JFK was shot from the front then why wasn’t there a gaping exit wound to the back of his head?
If only Richard Nixon had shaved on the afternoon of September 26, 1960. The world would be a far better place today.
Other than that Jackie, how was Dallas?
His wife scurried to the trunk of the car to gather up his brains when his head exploded, causing bits and pieces to fly backward. That is the famous picture of her scrambling onto the trunk of the car.
“Oswald also had $100.00 on him when arrested (again in today’s dollars).”
Don’t you mean $100 in 1963? Otherwise he would have had something like $5.78 in his pocket.
Oswald was a far from a Bernie bot that can be imagined. He was a patsy, just like he said. His murder by Jack Ruby, Mobbed up to the eyebrows for two or there decades, confirmed that a conspiracy was involved.
I haven't read Bugliosi's JFK book, although I did listen to him discuss it on C-SPAN where his abilities at logical argument were awesomely impressive as you say. I probably will look at it sometime but I already agree with the conclusion after reading various other large books.
You might be interested in some other books Bugliosi wrote:
The Betrayal of America: How the Supreme Court Undermined the Constitution and Chose Our President
If he was shot from behind why did his brains and skull fragment land on the back of the car?
I don’t have a horse in the race. Just asking a question.
Post 3
Beat me to it.
Bush league operation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.