Posted on 06/26/2017 9:50:28 AM PDT by Helicondelta
At least 3 justices signed off on a separate opinion on this...I think Gorsuch thomas And roberts
Winning feels good. Now let’s turn the heat up on Lunch.
Surely, you are correct. Lose is spelled loose (but only) here on FR.
huge: hugh
serious: series
stun: stune
etc.
“My name? R (only) B (only) Jones.”
OK. Private Ronely Bonely Jones.
what did they say?
Not to mention THERE and THEIR and THEY’RE.
So glad you posted it was unanimous. I was wondering why 9 and say you post and remembered (slow brain start Monday ;D.) Fantastic!!!
Alito.not roberts who signed off on separate opinion.. Too much for me to type on phone
See the
scotus blog website
Judge Napolitano speculated months ago and I agree that this travel ban will be reinstated by at least a 6-3 decision if not unanimously. The immigration statutes could be understood by a 10 year old.
The libtards will be wailing on TV tonight. LOL!
Rhetorical guestions you pose.
These circuit courts are obviously stacked by too many holdovers from likely the Clinton and Obummer years.
Thus, they are usurping authority as leftist activists to legislate from the bench.
Thank God for SCOTUS to exert reason and wisdom.
God Bless President Trump and Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Indeed, why not extend blessings today to the entire high court for ratifying our POTUS’ powers to protect the homeland.
People here are posting bs.
Three justices had a separate opinion. Glad to Gorsuch was with thomas and alito.
Good sign he might not end up as a kennedy
As you, yourself, could easily find that info, presume you attempt to make a point.
Wonkette was noted, as was WP when checked after you asked. As this image as been posted on FR prior (IIRC) had no idea there was a problem. If so, please feel free to ask the mods to remove it.
They weren’t weird, they were rogue, and in my opinion criminal.
And yes, I’d say it’s impeachable, and even abolishable.
What is the purpose of creating people powerful enough to destroy our country and hold us unable to defend ourselves at the whim of their own political preferences?
Intent, legal word, most of the time not used under recognized definition
Thank you. Thought him to be at one time, a Marine, but my memory is not all that sharp. As an actor, do remember seeing him on screen, but the movie? - it escapes me.
there’s no way a lower court judge should be able to over-rule a president or congress. It should be only the scotus.
And the unanimous ruling proves that.
Definitely agree on that.
Not only did they overrule the president, they extended their ruling nationally, essentially making themselves the unelected president.
Outrageous, and a total abuse of power. Frankly, they should be arrested for sedition. All of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.