Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: SFO near miss might have triggered ‘greatest aviation disaster in history’
Mercury News ^ | July 10, 2017 | Matthias Gafni, Bay Area News Group

Posted on 07/11/2017 9:51:32 AM PDT by Lonely Bull

SAN FRANCISCO — In what one aviation expert called a near-miss of what could have been the largest aviation disaster ever, an Air Canada pilot on Friday narrowly avoided a tragic mistake: landing on the San Francisco International Airport taxiway instead of the runway.

Sitting on Taxiway C shortly before midnight were four airplanes full of passengers and fuel awaiting permission to take off, according to the Federal Aviation Administration, which is investigating the “rare” incident. An air traffic controller sent the descending Air Canada Airbus 320 on a “go-around” — an unusual event where pilots must pull up and circle around to try again — before the safe landing, according to the federal agency.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: a320; aircanada; airport; aviation; california; canada; faa; runway; sanfrancisco; sfo; sumtingwong; taxiway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: All

Not saying this is anything other than a very serious incident, but the chances that the Air Canada plane actually would have hit any of the planes on the taxiway may be very small, even if he had come in a lot closer. (NOT saying I would ever want to have been on any of those planes at that moment).... he would have seen the planes more clearly as he got closer, and although reaction times would have been short he still could have powered up to go around....... or landed beyond the 4 waiting planes..... OF COURSE no one would ever want anyone to have to try their luck in such scenarios, but I doubt it’s any automatic “biggest airline disaster in history scenario”..... still, much too close a call !!!!


21 posted on 07/11/2017 10:17:50 AM PDT by Enchante (Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

I’m not sure what their procedure is, but that sounds reasoned.

Your best bet would be to ask Robe, Post #4.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3568405/posts?page=4#4


22 posted on 07/11/2017 10:18:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

I think the pilot in command of the aircraft in question did the right thing in notifying the controller of his concerns. I’m guessing the controller called “go around” sooner than the pilot did. Actually, the pilot could have started the “go around” before announcing it. Not the best practice. I certainly would have been been ready to firewall the throttles! Just a subtle change of hand position.


23 posted on 07/11/2017 10:19:26 AM PDT by Ace's Dad (BTW, "Ace" is now Captain Ace. But only when I'm bragging about my airline pilot son!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull
...an Air Canada pilot on Friday narrowly avoided a tragic mistake: landing on the San Francisco International Airport taxiway instead of the runway.

Harrison Ford flying for Air Canada now?

24 posted on 07/11/2017 10:20:03 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Yup. ILS. No idea how this could have happened. It does not make sense.


25 posted on 07/11/2017 10:23:32 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Wasn’t just “this guy”.

That airplane had at least two pilots.


26 posted on 07/11/2017 10:28:51 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Remember it was an A320 that took-out many acres of trees about 20 years ago because they couldn’t get the engines out of idle in time.


27 posted on 07/11/2017 10:30:52 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

Snoop “Soul Plane” Dogg at the controls.


28 posted on 07/11/2017 10:32:29 AM PDT by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

I did the same thing. Hashes on the runway were snow-blown, there were no aircraft on the taxiway, and it was only me in a Beech B19.

Oh, and I was a student pilot.

And Approach advised me that I was lined up wrong so I slipped on the final and actually hit the runway with room to spare.


29 posted on 07/11/2017 10:35:30 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

That would seem true. I can’t help but be curious how this happened. It seems like it would be very hard to make this mistake.


30 posted on 07/11/2017 10:36:14 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

Before I clicked on the thread, I had a premonition that I would see a post just like yours. I must be psychic.


31 posted on 07/11/2017 10:39:00 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

A go-around is not an ‘unusual’ event.


32 posted on 07/11/2017 10:43:26 AM PDT by SkyDancer (You know they invented wheelbarrows to teach FAA inspectors to walk on their hind legs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

Dam this is bad... at the very least the Air Canada pilots career is done.... how the hell do you line up on the taxiway and not the runway.. they have a line of light point right down the center-line of the runway


33 posted on 07/11/2017 10:43:35 AM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Harrison Ford the pilot?


34 posted on 07/11/2017 10:45:32 AM PDT by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Or Foster Brooks perhaps?


35 posted on 07/11/2017 10:48:37 AM PDT by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Don’t forgot the ground base Instrument Landing System (ILS)that tells the pilot and aircraft their approach vectors.


36 posted on 07/11/2017 10:50:11 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Perhaps the taxiway “identified” as a runway. Have you not taken the taxiway’s feelings into account?
A test pilot I knew (RIP, cancer) told of an occasion when he was ferrying some corporate execs from one plant to another in very windy conditions.

And as he was approaching the destination he was considering how tricky the landing and shutdown of his Cessna was going to be in such a high crosswind. At that point the destination tower called him, and asked if he wanted to land on runway 32 (or whatever it actually was, I dunno). He replied, “I sure would!” (the number of a runway, for those who don’t know any more about it than I did when he told me the story, is the heading, expressed in tens of degrees, an aircraft would approach it for a landing) and then asked himself what they were talking about.

Then he realized that there was a short section of taxiway which had that heading - and since he was flying a light plane with a low landing speed into the teeth of a high headwind, he would have no difficulty landing there and being able to deplane his passengers.

So there is at least one case of a taxiway identifying as a runway.


37 posted on 07/11/2017 10:52:54 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (A press can be “associated,” or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
AND 28R has this approach lighting system:


38 posted on 07/11/2017 11:00:32 AM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robe

I am not a pilot but I now SFO very well having flown in and out of it hundreds of times. This Canadian pilot must of had some kind of impairment to mistake that TW for a runway. It is plain as day, clearly lit and marked.


39 posted on 07/11/2017 11:04:30 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

This is irresponsible journalism as usual. In no way was this a near miss. The landing pilot saw the aircraft on the ground. There was no way he was going to land on them.


40 posted on 07/11/2017 11:07:51 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson