Posted on 07/27/2017 4:38:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
US Attorney overseeing the Awan family investigation is Steven Wasserman, the brother of Wasserman Schultz!
(Excerpt) Read more at voat.co ...
Oh that’s convenient-’very careless but no intent in this matter’ case closed.....
George has a new video with his slides. He explains his theories along the way to finding this spy ring.
Day 280.1 Hillary’s Leakers, Hackers, and Henchmen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P23L-zY8CeY
Thanks - I’ve been posting it at various sites too!
Roger Simon at PJ Media had an interesting take:
Jeff Sessions should immediately appoint a special counsel in this case whose tentacles are so vast they reach the highest levels of our government. The FBI, working unsupervised, has already been tainted by its heavily-criticized investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails, an investigation that actually may turn out to be related to this one. It cannot be trusted to do this by themselves. We need a special counsel.
Further, unlike Russiagate, this is an investigation that already has a crime (Awan will be arraigned August 21). It isn’t in search of one. It’s just trying to find out its extent wherever it leads. That’s what special counsels do. And in this case, Sessions should make sure that, unlike Mueller, the new special counsel picks associates on both sides of the aisle. Unlike the biased Russia investigation, this should be even-handed. We want to believe its conclusions in the end.
There are a lot of shoelaces to be tied up here. Among them:
Why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz keep this man in her employ right up until he was arrested Tuesday night when he has been under suspicion for months. Does he have something on her or other people?
Why did Nancy Pelosi lie when she said she never heard of Awan? Email revealed by Wikileaks says Awan had access to Pelosi’s iPad. (Wiklileaks has never been shown to be inaccurate.)
What is on the smashed hard drives Awan is trying to retrieve from the FBI? (Oh, those Democrats and their hard drives.)
Why is Awan suddenly being legally represented at the highest level by Clinton ultra-loyalist Chris Gowan — a fact-checker for Bill Clinton’s memoir of all things? (They are already using the same right-wing conspiracy baloney they used in the Lewinski case.) Does this make sense if Awan’s just a low-life fraudster? Why not let him dangle?
Just what is the relationship, if any, between the Awan case and the unsolved Seth Rich murder? Is it entirely an accident that Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s brother Steven is accused of blocking the investigation? Denials from Debbie aren’t worth much anymore.
Where did the Wikileaks come from anyway? Was it really Russia?
That is, as they say, the tip of the proverbial iceberg. As for why Awan was chosen in the first place, well, if there’s anything Democrats fear, it’s being called an Islamophobe or in any way politically incorrect. Who better than someone of Pakistani origin to do your IT work? It proves just what a wonderful person you are, doesn’t it?
Do it, Jeff!
Why would the Clinton’s lawyer represent a low level staffer? Unless he’s not a low level staffer but the center of espionage and blackmail.
Let liberal heads explode, appoint Rudy Giuliani as special prosecutor...
Flashback to May 10 when this video was created by George. Hillary set up this network in 1998.
12 Minutes
Day 199.1 Hillary’s Hackers, Awan Brothers Saga Deepens, Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=o3jZrpHNf64
Around the 1 min mark he talks about Hillary – she set up the wireless network for the blackberries (so 1998). The wireless backbone is compartmentalized – various agencies, defense, etc. and ratlines.
Awan’s are experts with wireless tapping through desktop sync – a kiss signal is sent to the blackberry
Facepalm.
Just unbelievable.
The swamp creatures have tentacles into everything.
On the plus side, it appears that they trust very, very few people and are relying on an extremely short list including blood relatives for the most sensitive issues. How many blood relatives do any of these people have?
The problem for the swamp creatures is that most will turn on each other to save their own skin. So once the dominoes start to fall, look out below.......
“Why would Sessions have to remove himself from any decision on this IT Congressional Spy ring.”
******
He doesn’t have to...but his track record of abdicating his fundamental job duties as AG suggests he’ll punt on this one too. Heck, maybe he can get Holder or Lynch to come back as special counsel to whitewash the whole thing.
I thought Trump fired all the US Attorneys, I wonder if his sister pulled strings to keep him on. The n swamp is deep
ping
Sessions is screwed! This will settle once and for all what side Sessions is on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.