[reaganaut1]

Good. Coercing people to buy policies on exchanges is immoral, and it's not working.

[Alberta's Child]

Interesting. Sounds like they are going to take the cost-sharing model used by organizations that operate under Obamacare’s religious exemptions and allow some limited expansion to non-religious groups.

[2banana]

REMOVE all EXEMPTIONS. Especially for congress and unions.

End the individual mandate.

Stop all subsidizes that were not in the original passed law.

[Jeff Chandler]

Whatever he does will be tied up in the courts for years.

[NonValueAdded]

Was not the ACA riddled with “SecHHS shall” clauses, essentially letting the Executive make ACA whatever they wanted it to be??? Well, there’s a new SecHHS, is there not? Do the not report to the President? Didn’t Øbama waive a boatload of clauses himself?

[grumpygresh]

Good if the insurance companies don’t like it. The major insurance companies are merely proxies for big government insurance. Right now, the big insurance companies function as health insurance administrator oligopolies (they don’t do real indemnity insurance anymore- 9its the government) and don’t like the competition.

[wastedyears]

the president could not unilaterally change the laws that regulate insurance

That never stopped 0bama from legislating via pen and phone.

[stockpirate]

This SUCKS, the next President can just reverse the order.

[upchuck]

This is a little OT, but I want to post this pic from the article:

Compare and/or contrast that pic with this one:

'nuff said.

[I want the USA back]

The media and the left will claim that he is blocking peoples’ access to “healthcare.”