Posted on 01/05/2018 6:32:54 PM PST by randita
“Uh, oh! you dare to critique the faultless and brilliant former grocery store manager mark bradman aka sundance? “
On Machiavellian analysis of the inner working of our government, I will take Sundance over Mark Levin ANY day.
And I used to be a gas station attendant before Uncle Same saw fit to make me a member of a TACAMO crew, single-handedly sending absolute end-of-the-world messages.
Sundance just found himself eager to talk on a subject he is not familiar with. And he should not have.
Everything in your analysis is correct. Between obama holdovers, gop establishment swamp dirtbags, the left wing democrat media, the deep state bureacrcy and the democrats trump has his work cut out.
I agree.
Trump's on a 'blues brother' mission from God...
Trump's on a 'blues brother' mission from God...
One other “coincidence” in the timeline Sundance did not mention. Trump effectively won the GOP primary on May 26, when some unbound delegates from Oklahoma and North Dakota declared for him. At that point, everyone knew he would be the GOP nominee. The formal nomination only came in July.
The first DOJ FISA Court warrant to monitor Trump was made in JUNE (a few days later!) by the DOJ National Security Division, and would have had to be approved by NSD’s head, Assisstant AG John Carlin. Carlin resigned on September 26, 2016 as outlined by Sundance, when NSA Chief Mike Rogers had requested audits of FISA requests.
Carlin is now a in private practice with Morrison & Foerster LLP. You can read his bio here and watch him speak.
https://www.mofo.com/people/john-carlin.html
From his bio: Prior to assuming his role in the NSD, Mr. Carlin served as Chief of Staff and Senior Counsel to Robert S. Mueller III
Question: WHY would a top DOJ AD, confidant of Mueller and praised by Loretta Lynch, resign 5 weeks before the expected election of Hillary Clinton, which would probably propel him even higher in the DOJ?
IMHO - this guy needs to be subpoenaed ASAP!
You don't think Jeb was given a pass?
Yep...and any plot against President Trump will backfire big time against them!
Well, maybe it's damn time some of the 'oh so smart' stepped up to the plate to tell us WTF was happening... And yeah, it there's a coup by 'intelligence services' I WANT TO KNOW how the sausage was made.
See tag: (Intelligence services coup failed. Robert Hanssen (American traitor) to get new roommates soon.)
I’d want to hear why she didn’t vote for it.
Wow, the skatety-eighth level of certainty.
That’s beyond the triple dog dare.
Since you’re part of Horowitz’ team of investigators I guess we can take what you post as gospel.
In every society, at any time in history, there are always opposing factions competing for control of resources, power & wealth. During the American revolution, it was an evenly divided 3-way split between supporters, loyalists & those who were non-committed.
Long before the Indian partition led to the organic (ie mass movement) separation of Muzzies from Hindus, those who were opposed to US independence were driven out, had their property confiscated, and emigrated to Canada and back to England.
So the primary issue isn't to worry & wring ones hands over the obvious national division, but to recognize that it's a fight to the finish. The left would give us no quarter if they had prevailed with Cankles; look how far they took anti-constitutional measures under the Kenyan's reign.
It is up to us to support Trump's war against the deep state. Any comparisons to Watergate actually greatly diminish what really took place here. In actuality, this is perhaps the most serious national crisis since CW1. To quote Cato: "Ceterum censeo Communistem delendam esse."
If you wish to continue to guess differently, then good luck with that.
If outcomes are written in stone then nobody needs a crystal ball or self-styled sages pretending to read the tea leaves and telling us everything we want to hear in the hopes of acquiring fame and glory for themselves, now do we? What you’re reading and hearing is opinion, and you know what they say about those. We’ll know when we know.
From public statements I’ve heard Joe DiGenova seems to think that the OIG investigation is broad and will hang people involved with the Steele dossier, the Flynn prosecution, the FISA wiretap, the whole ball of wax. He could be hoping and guessing because there’s no reason to think that the OIG is leaking. But he’s in a better position than most to make an educated guess, former US attorney for Washington DC
The story is that Steele paid some go-betweens to talk to Russian insiders to get dirt on Trump. But that comes from Steele. Some questions:
- Why do we accept on their face Steele’s statements as to his sources and methods?
- Why do we accept on its face the assertion that Steele is “ex” MI-6?
- Why do we assume that his sources were Russian?
- Wouldn’t it make more sense to consider the possibility that globalist pro-EU elements within the British government might have concocted false and damaging stories about Trump, and used a “former” MI-6 agent to supply them to like-minded globalists in the US to use against Trump the nationalist candidate?
- Doesn’t globalist Brit meddling in the US election to stop nationalist Trump make more sense than Russian meddling?
What this shows is how willing the uniparty is willing to use government powers illegitimately — but we already knew that with the Patriot Act, the NSA's domestic espionage, and things like the IRS political targeting and Fast & Furious.
But SJWs always *project*, don't they?
That's true; but I'm not sure the elites are SJWs per se, the institutionalized arrogance and narcissism of the elites does, however, tend to produce some of the same behaviors (though not all of them).
Treason would be hard to prove, as the founders intended, because a lot of the case would stem from secondary-effects rather than a direct, provable action like waging war against the States. I believe it would be possible, but very difficult — much easier would be things like Conspiracy [to Defraud the United States?], Sedition, and the like.
BOTH parties colluded to violate the Constitution. ----- yes.
Certainly. And that is enough to hang them, it's one thing the higher-ups and politically powerful cannot let happen: if it gets out that the Birthers were right all along
it instantly discredits huge portions of the government, especially the Judiciary which was all too gleeful in its usage of standing
to declare that nobody could even make a case on the matter. &mdsah; Imagine, for a few minutes, the fallout that would be caused… now, imagine for a few moments that the Clinton Foundation had ties to many highly-placed office-holders and that a real investigation would turn this up. What would the fallout be if it was shown that the Iran Deal was spearheaded via the Clinton Foundation? And what if it could be proved that the Iran Deal was literal Treason?
The response from the remote server was: 552 5.2.0 v9qQ1w00i3fsZZ501 - v9qQ1w00i3fsZZ5019qRnd This message has been rejected due to content judged to be spam by the internet community IB212 - If you feel this is in error, please submit a request using the following page.
Makes one wonder who is deciding this is spam? Zuckerberg? Yeah, I trust him regarding what's spam and what's not./s
It is striking that your three references highlighted two bloody civil wars and a revolutionary war. Are we facing another one?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.