Skip to comments.
CONFESSIONS OF A CONGRESSIONAL STAFFER: Forget The Nunes Memo & Focus On Grassley-Graham
DC Whispers ^
| 2-11-18
Posted on 02/12/2018 7:27:31 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Read the whole thing at the link. Although he doesn't name names (except for heavy hints towards Obama), the incident he describes is particularly alarming regarding our elections.
To: afraidfortherepublic
2
posted on
02/12/2018 7:34:12 AM PST
by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: afraidfortherepublic
How about a summary or excerpt of what’s so ‘alarming’?
3
posted on
02/12/2018 7:35:34 AM PST
by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: Hostage
Obama stole 2012 from Romney?
4
posted on
02/12/2018 7:38:58 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service ... #ReleaseTheMemo)
To: afraidfortherepublic
If this guy is such a heavyweight, how come he is confusing Carter Page with Christoper Steele? [About halfway through]
The editing on some of these web articles is atrocious.
5
posted on
02/12/2018 7:39:30 AM PST
by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: Hostage
The son of a Congressman admitted to the staffer in the article that the Dems cheated in the 2012 election.
I don't consider that alarming. What is concerning is that people know this and do nothing.
To: afraidfortherepublic
So DC Whispers is now complicit in covering up election fraud ?
7
posted on
02/12/2018 7:40:04 AM PST
by
onona
To: Tench_Coxe
Yes...if they DIDN’T cheat...then that would be news!
8
posted on
02/12/2018 7:42:28 AM PST
by
gr8eman
(Facts and evidence are bourgeois constructs weaponized by patriarchal penis-people)
To: Hostage
How about a summary or excerpt of whats so alarming?
<>
It’s not that long. I’m sure you could get through it in a couple of minutes.
9
posted on
02/12/2018 7:43:15 AM PST
by
laplata
(Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: rbg81
Thought the same thing. Seemed weird that he would indicate that the FBI took Page at his word when he meant Steele.
10
posted on
02/12/2018 7:43:22 AM PST
by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: onona
No one was more surprised at the 2012 outcome than Barack Obama ( or whatever his real name is ) himself.
11
posted on
02/12/2018 7:44:07 AM PST
by
atc23
(The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
To: rbg81
dont want to lose anyone in the weeds here but what the head of the FBI testified to before the Senate was that he basically took Carter Page at his word and ignored all of the other bias that was swirling around Page which would normally have made him someone clearly not worthy to be used as justification for making a FISA warrant request. There is really only one credible explanation for this Carter Page was hired to create something that was used as justification to provide legal cover for what was a highly illegal surveillance program against the opposition candidate of a sitting President of the United States. James Comey attempted to explain this all away by basically saying, We believed Carter Page because Carter Page assured us he was believable. And please dont forget that through all of this, James Comey and the other high-ranking FBI officials involved (some who still remain at the FBI) neglected to inform the FISA Court of the Clinton campaigns direct involvement in the Trump Dossier, Fusion GPS, etc. (The Clinton campaign was Fusion GPSs most important client at the time.) Yep, Carter Page should be Christopher Steele in this entire paragraph. I stopped reading at this point.
12
posted on
02/12/2018 7:46:47 AM PST
by
NutsOnYew
(If the world was perfect, it wouldn't be.)
To: BigEdLB
13
posted on
02/12/2018 7:49:28 AM PST
by
rdcbn
To: rjsimmon
It is possible that it is the author making the mistake and not the article’s subject. Still, it really detracts from the narrative And, since no one is actually named, the whole thing smacks of fake news to me.
14
posted on
02/12/2018 7:49:34 AM PST
by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Just reading that little snippet convinced me that every one of these people is so brimming to the top with hubris that they should be taken out and shot.
Figuratively speaking, of course.
To: Tench_Coxe
Something tells me, before the congressional elections, the ability and carefree nature of stealing elections is going to be “fixed”.
Make more popcorn, make more rope...
To: Hostage
Obama stole the 2012 election, which we all knew.
17
posted on
02/12/2018 7:53:28 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
To: rbg81
Definitely not out of the question. Without citing a specific source, that HUGE mistake calls the document into question. One of those “want it to be true” instead of “verifiably true”.
18
posted on
02/12/2018 7:54:05 AM PST
by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: Tench_Coxe
This ‘confession’ doesn’t make sense. Allegedly there was cheating in a district for Obama and presumably for the dem congressional district. Yet, the cheating is described as having pissed off the dem who benefitted, WTH?
19
posted on
02/12/2018 7:54:53 AM PST
by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Reads like a cheap propaganda piece.
20
posted on
02/12/2018 7:55:36 AM PST
by
robel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson