Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump administration reveals $3.9 billion Boeing deal for new Air Force One planes
Washington Examiner ^ | July 18, 2018 | Gabby Morrongiello

Posted on 07/18/2018 8:57:02 AM PDT by GonzoII

The Trump administration on Wednesday said it struck multibillion dollar deal with Boeing to build two new Air Force One planes for the executive branch by 2024, marking the first time in more than three decades that the president's air fleet has been upgraded.

"The contract sets the total price for the two completed 'Air Force One' replacement aircraft at $3.9 billion, saving the taxpayers over $1.4 billion from the initially proposed $5.3 billion cost-plus contract," White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement.

"President Donald J. Trump has emphasized the need to minimize the cost of replacing the two existing Air Force One aircraft.," Sanders added. "Yesterday’s action meets that objective and reflects the President’s commitment to our military and to protecting taxpayer dollars."

Construction of the new 747-8 planes is expected to occur in San Antonio, the Pentagon said in a separate statement on Wednesday, projecting a completion date sometime in 2024.

The announcement comes just days after Trump told CBS News in an interview that he has directed Boeing to paint the presidential jets red, white, and blue...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boeing; trump; trumpwinsagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Trump wins again!
1 posted on 07/18/2018 8:57:02 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I wonder why they are going for new 747s instead of 777s??? More space? Four engines versus two? The 747 is less fuel efficient. Interesting.


2 posted on 07/18/2018 9:00:01 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

“The 747 is less fuel efficient.”

I don’t think gas mileage is high on the list of priorities. The 747-8 is a much larger A/C than the 777.


3 posted on 07/18/2018 9:04:24 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I believe there are a few reasons. First, I suspect that with four engines the 747 has more power-generation capability, and probably has better flight characteristics and range after the loss of one engine than would be the case with the 777.

Also, by sticking with the same airframe they’re not having to “reinvent the wheel” to accommodate the technology already incorporated into the current 747 frame.

Fuel efficiency is probably not the biggest consideration because of the air-refueling capability of the aircraft.

Just my opinion...


4 posted on 07/18/2018 9:04:39 AM PDT by RavenATB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

The presidential airplane is required to have 4 engines. Its an Air Force requirement. partly due the ability to generate enough electricity.


5 posted on 07/18/2018 9:05:36 AM PDT by airplaneguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

What happened to the deal Trump negotiated to use a couple of 747’s from a bankrupt Russian airline...?


6 posted on 07/18/2018 9:11:50 AM PDT by spokeshave2 (WWG1WGA.....Where we go one we go all....WWG1WGA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

They saved most of that Money by converting the Military Spec Toilet Seats to 18K Gold.


7 posted on 07/18/2018 9:15:09 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
The 747 is less fuel efficient. Interesting.

Air Force One can refuel at altitude and stay up as long as they have food and water. Fuel consumption isn't a significant concern, I'm guessing.

8 posted on 07/18/2018 9:16:46 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave2
U.S. Buys Boeing 747s Once Set for Russia for Air Force One By Anthony Capaccio and Rick Clough

August 4, 2017, 2:14 PM PDT Updated on August 4, 2017, 2:58 PM PDT

U.S. Air Force reached a deal with Boeing Co. for two 747 jets to serve as Air Force One, taking advantage of an unusual limited-time discount on planes once bound for Russia.

“We got a really good deal,” Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson said Friday in an interview. “I’m pleased with that.” The service said the jets, which will require extensive work to serve as planes for the president, are scheduled to be operational in 2024.

9 posted on 07/18/2018 9:17:09 AM PDT by spokeshave2 (WWG1WGA.....Where we go one we go all....WWG1WGA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave2

Sounds like Trump forced the military and Boeing to collude with Russia again.

Persons pretending to be John McCain will be up in arms one more time!!!!!


10 posted on 07/18/2018 9:29:20 AM PDT by Bartholomew Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I thought Trump was just going to repaint the existing “fleet”?


11 posted on 07/18/2018 9:32:34 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

It would be a good idea if POTUS allowed some American voter input regarding the new livery paint job.


12 posted on 07/18/2018 9:32:42 AM PDT by HChampagne (Cruz supporter but I will support and vote for Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Obama wore out the old ones


13 posted on 07/18/2018 9:34:24 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HChampagne
This paint scheme works for me.

Do it in a thermal sensitive paint so it reverts to Air Force cammo at altitude.


14 posted on 07/18/2018 9:42:42 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( Tagline disabled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Unlikely it will be ready for Trumps second term, but Pence can use it for 8 years after that.


15 posted on 07/18/2018 9:47:14 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

RANGE over efficiency. And payload (passengers and electroncis).


16 posted on 07/18/2018 9:51:28 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RavenATB
Fuel efficiency is probably not the biggest consideration because of the air-refueling capability of the aircraft.

Air refueling has been deleted from the replacement because it was never needed with the current 747s.

17 posted on 07/18/2018 9:56:11 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Power. 747 can haul an immense load. Also, the 747 can fly at Mach 0.92, nearly 700 mph.

When president Bush was returning to Washington DC on 9/11, the F16s escorting him had to request that Air Force 1 SLOW down a bit because the F16s could not keep up without going into afterburner.

747 is still the “cadillac” of airframes.


18 posted on 07/18/2018 10:13:08 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

“...747 is still the “cadillac” of airframes....”

Yes, she is quite a bird. A great ship. And given the purposes of Air Force One, the requirement for four engines makes a lot of sense. In past years, spent many hours on them flying back and forth to the Orient and Europe. I guess the A380 would be overkill....(chuckle)


19 posted on 07/18/2018 10:40:52 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

The existing 747s are 747-200s dating back to the early eighties. They are beyond overdue for modernization. It’s embarrassing our president (whoever it is) is flying around in 40 year old planes!


20 posted on 07/18/2018 10:46:34 AM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson