Posted on 10/03/2018 4:39:40 AM PDT by Dana1960
Not just possible, but highly probable. Good grief. That’s it - no one wants to appear that they are denying her grief. If we know that she’s been an anti-Trump activist, then why would anyone think she would not stoop so low as to lie about something like this? FOX commentators and contributors need to go ahead and step it up. This “something happened to her” is just an “out” they give themselves.
I don’t think they need it.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave...”
—
Prosecutor Mitchell opened the door with her questions about helping anyone with getting through a polygraph test and Ford walked right in - into perjury.
Don’t know if this is really Ford or not, but here it is:
I’m not sure that’s her either, but there are certainly similarities in the facial structure of the 2016 McLean photo and the 2018 person. The nose is right, the hair is parted on the other side, but one of the photos could be mirror image. If she’s gained a bit of weight in the last 2 years, it sure could be her.
No, it was someone else who is linked to the FBI, though. Can’t remember his name.
I find it interesting that an independent consultant in DC on linked in does not have a picture. I read through at least fifteen posted articles online before I found a picture that says it is her - and the person pictured taking a polygraph (supposedly Ford) certainly resembles Mclean.
***The people calling for the investigation have essentially screwed their own.***
Only if you think the FBI are honest people. I think this will be like all other FBI investigations. They’ll find something to pin on Kav, and he won’t be confirmed.
D.C. is a bigger cesspool than I’ve thought for years. It’s like a bunch of inbreeding there.
Pray for our country. Pray for all of us.
The photo was part of the original article being discussed, so the picture shown is a larger crop and relevant. Otherwise, I agree that you can't just take a picture and assume someone is the same as the other. In this case, I think CTH stretches credulity on suggesting Avenatti is pictured with McLean.
Looking like the two NC reports of possible criminal wrong doing by Dr. Fraud that we’re erased were easy peasy with the FBI in your back pocket.
McLean worked with Preet Bhaharra at SDNY. AG Sessions fired Preet Bhaharra who alleges he was “fired after a series of “uncomfortable” telephone calls that made him feel that President Trump might be trying to compromise his independence as a federal prosecutor.” There is little factual information about why he was fired. But Preet Bhaharra has a well-known grudge against President Trump.
There is suspicion today that Ford’s friend McLean took the polygraph for her. The polygraph was administered by a friendly ex FBI polygrapher. He violates professional conduct by asking only two questions and does not ask ANY CONTROL QUESTIONS to calibrate machine responses. The standard and most common control question is “Is your name Christine Margaret Ford?”
How very curious that the friendly ex-FBI polygrapher does not get the person taking the test to verify her identity.
This whole thing smells like an FBI setup to get Trump.
Now we have the conflicted FBI investigating Ford with obvious motive to not implicate itself.
Which photo? I don’t think I’ve seen that one. Let me know where to find it, please.
Yeah, I’m not saying it is or isn’t her. Just that all sorts of pics pop up when something like this occurs. so I wouldn’t take anything as gospel.
Could be her at a different time, but her look isn’t as distinctive as is the Creepy Porn Lawyer’s.
Going back just a year or so, I recall some right here mocking this writer. Some even demanded his stuff not be posted here. ☺
More likely McLean was hooked up to the machine. That would explain the lack of the standard control question “Is your name Christine Blasey Ford?”
Excellent observation and surmise there!
“...could help bring down the Deep State too!”
This is starting to look like the very Deep State at work. It smells like an op the CIA would concoct, just like the Steele Dossier / FBI trap that was set.
Makes even more sense why Ford and/or her attorneys haven’t given the senate committee the polygraph results/information.
iirc, when the Strozk/Page story broke weren’t there 5 more FBI people who were suspected of being involved? But, don’t recall ever seeing any names published.
And probably why DiFi wants to keep the FBI feedback report private.
24 years
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
