Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USCIS Policy Manual Update (Citizenship)
www.uscis.gov ^ | 08.28.2019 | uscis

Posted on 08/28/2019 1:08:58 PM PDT by rxsid

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issues policy guidance on “residence” requirements for acquiring citizenship

Introduction

Our latest update to the USCIS Policy Manual defines “residence” as it relates to citizenship for children of certain U.S. government employees and members of the U.S. armed forces who are employed or stationed outside the United States, to conform with the definition of residence in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This guidance rescinds previously established USCIS policy, which stated that certain children who were living outside the United States were considered “residing in” the United States.

As a result, it changes the process that parents of such children must follow to obtain a Certificate of Citizenship for their children. Under the previous policy, parents of those children could file either Form N-600, Application for Certificate of Citizenship, or Form N-600K, Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate Under Section 322, on behalf of their children. As of Oct. 29, 2019, these parents must file Form N-600K to obtain U.S. citizenship for any child who did not acquire citizenship at birth or while residing in the United States. Therefore, we will apply current guidance to all applications filed before Oct. 29, 2019.

Policy Update at a Glance

The updates to the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 12, Citizenship and Naturalization, and Part H, Children of U.S. Citizens:

  • Clarify that temporary visits to the U.S. do not establish U.S. residence;
  • Explain the distinction between residence and physical presence in the United States; and
  • Explain that USCIS no longer considers children who are living abroad with a parent who is a U.S. government employee or U.S. service member as “residing in the United States” for purposes of acquiring citizenship under INA 320.

How Children Acquire Citizenship

U.S. laws allow children to acquire U.S. citizenship other than through birth in the United States. Children who were born outside of the United States to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth under INA 301 or 309. Children may also acquire citizenship after birth, but before the age of 18, through their U.S. citizen parent(s) under INA 320.

Policy Update Regarding Children of U.S. Government Employees or Service Members Employed or Stationed Abroad Who Were Born Outside the United States

Who This Policy Update Affects

This policy may affect children residing outside the United States who were born outside the United States to:

  • Non-U.S. citizen parents and adopted by a U.S. citizen U.S. government employee or U.S. service member after their birth;
  • Non-U.S. citizen parents, such as a lawful permanent resident U.S. government employee or U.S. service member who naturalized only after the child’s birth; or
  • Two U.S. citizen government employee or U.S. service member parents who do not meet the residence or physical presence requirements to transmit citizenship to their child at birth (or one non-U.S. citizen parent and one U.S. citizen parent who does not meet these requirements). 

For more information on this policy update contact uscispolicymanual@uscis.dhs.gov. For case-specific inquiries, call the USCIS Contact Center.

Who This Policy Update Does Not Affect

This policy does not affect children born outside the United States who were citizens at birth or who have already acquired citizenship, including children who:

  • Were born to two U.S. citizen parents, at least one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions before the child’s birth;
  • Were born to married parents, one of whom is a U.S. citizen and one a foreign national, if the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. or one of its outlying possessions for at least five years, at least two of which were after they turned 14 years old;
  • Were born to unmarried parents, one of whom is a U.S. citizen and one a foreign national, if the U.S. citizen parent meets the requirements listed in INA 309;
  • Are otherwise eligible to receive a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) or a Certificate of Citizenship documenting U.S. citizenship acquired at birth; or
  • Are residing in the United States in the legal and physical custody of their U.S. citizen parent after being lawfully admitted to the U.S. for permanent residence.

For more information, see Policy Manual, Volume 12, Part H, Children of U.S. Citizens, Chapter 3, United States Citizens at Birth (INA 301 and 309), or email uscispolicymanual@uscis.dhs.gov.

Reason for the Policy Update

We are updating this policy because it conflicts with the definition of “residence” in the INA and also with INA 322(d), which was enacted in 2008 after this policy was instituted, and refers to children who are residing abroad with members of the armed forces of the United States as “residing outside of the United States.” In addition, the previous guidance conflicts with Department of State guidance. Having conflicting policies can lead to inconsistent decisions on citizenship claims by USCIS and the Department of State and can cause confusion as to the date children of U.S. service members and government employees stationed abroad become U.S. citizens.

General Provisions for Eligibility

The table below serves as a quick reference guide to certain residence, physical presence, and overseas naturalization provisions for children of U.S. citizen service members. A person eligible under INA 320 would file Form N-600, and a parent filing for a child under 18 residing outside of the United States would file Form N-600K.

Residence, Lawful Admission, and Overseas Naturalization for Children of Members of the U.S. Armed Forces

INA Section

Place of Residence Lawful Admission Residence Requirement

Automatic Citizenship

or Overseas Naturalization

320 United States The child must be lawfully admitted for permanent residence. The child must reside with U.S. citizen parent in the United States. The child may acquire automatic citizenship (must take the Oath of Allegiance in the United States to obtain a Certificate of Citizenship).
322(d) Outside the United States Lawful admission is not required for the child. The child must reside with U.S. citizen parent serving abroad. The parent must apply for citizenship, but the child may complete the entire naturalization process from outside the United States if they are authorized to accompany their U.S. citizen parent who is on official military orders (the child must take the Oath of Allegiance before their 18th birthday, unless we waive this requirement during an interview).

When a Parent Should Not File Form N-600K

U.S. government employees and U.S. service members who are employed or stationed outside the United States should not file Form N-600K if:

  • The child has already acquired citizenship under INA sections 301, 309, or 320, or on or before Feb. 27, 2001, under the repealed INA section 321;
  • They are a U.S. citizen whose only relationship to the child is as a stepparent;
  • They are not the U.S. citizen parent of the child, unless that parent has died; or
  • The child is over the age of 18.

The chart below provides additional examples of when parents should or should not file Form N-600K.

If the child is residing outside the United States and: Then:

The child is born to two U.S. citizen parents on a military base or at an off-base hospital outside of the United States

The parents can apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) with the Department of State or a Certificate of Citizenship from USCIS using Form N-600. At least one parent must prove residence in the U.S. before the child’s birth. The parent should not file Form N-600K.

See the Department of State Birth of U.S. Citizens Abroad webpage for more information

The child is born to two lawful permanent resident (LPR) parents on a military base or at an off-base hospital outside of the United States

At least one parent must naturalize before the child is eligible to acquire citizenship. The U.S. citizen parent must establish five years of physical presence in the United States (at least two of which were after they turned 14 years old) before the parent may file an N-600K on the child’s behalf.  

However, in the case of a child of a U.S. service member who is residing abroad on their parent’s official military orders, the parent can count any period of time residing abroad on official orders as physical presence in the United States.

See our website for more information.

The child is born in wedlock to a U.S. citizen parent and an LPR parent on a military base or at an off-base hospital outside of the United States on or after Nov. 14, 1986

The U.S. citizen parent must prove physical presence in the United States for a period of not less than five years (at least two of which were after they turned 14 years old). However, the U.S. citizen parent can count any of the following periods as physical presence in the United States:

  • Honorable service in the U.S. armed forces;
  • Employment with the U.S. government or certain international organizations; or
  • Being physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter of:
    • A service member honorably serving in the U.S. military;
    • A U.S. government employee; or
    • An employee of a qualifying international organization.

If the parent meets the physical presence requirement, they can apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) with the Department of State or a Certificate of Citizenship from USCIS using Form N-600. The parent should not file Form N-600K.

The child was born to an LPR parent who then naturalizes after the birth of the child

The U.S. citizen parent must establish five years of physical presence in the United States (at least two of which were after they turned 14 years old) before they may file an N-600K on the child’s behalf.

However, in the case of a child of a U.S. service member who is residing abroad with them on their official orders, the parent can count any period of time residing abroad on official orders as physical presence in the United States.

The child is living on a military base outside of the United States when their parent(s) naturalize on that military base

The U.S. citizen parent must establish five years of physical presence in the United States (at least two of which were after they turned 14 years old) before the parent may file an N-600K on the child’s behalf.

However, in the case of a child of a U.S. service member who is residing abroad with them on their official orders, the parent can count any period of time residing abroad on official orders as physical presence in the United States.

See our website for more information.

  • The child was born outside of the United States;
  • The child later becomes an LPR and resides in the United States in the legal and physical custody of their parents when one of them naturalizes in the United States; and
  • The child subsequently resides outside of the United States with the parents

The child became a U.S. citizen upon the parent’s naturalization. The family may file an N-600 for the child, but must return to the United States for an interview to obtain the Certificate of Citizenship.  The family may also apply for a passport for the child from the Department of State from outside of the United States. The parent should not file Form N-600K.

The child is the stepchild of the U.S. citizen service member and a biological  child of an LPR parent

The U.S. citizen service member must adopt the child before the child could qualify for citizenship through the stepparent. Or, once the LPR parent naturalizes and establishes five years of physical presence (at least two of which were after they turned 14 years old), they can file Form N-600K for the child.

See our website for more information.

Important Facts to Know

  • Military bases outside of the United States are not considered “in the United States” in relation to birthright citizenship. Therefore, the only way children born abroad can acquire citizenship at birth is through their parents.
  • If you were a U.S. citizen when you gave birth to your child while outside the United States on military orders, your child is most likely a U.S. citizen. As long as you met certain physical presence or residence requirements before your child’s birth, this policy update does not affect you, and you can apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) for your child at a U.S. Consulate and/or a Certificate of Citizenship from USCIS using Form N-600.
  • Military members stationed outside the United States who file a Form N-600K on behalf of their child will not need to travel to the United States to get a Certificate of Citizenship for their child.
  • Stepchildren cannot acquire U.S. citizenship through a U.S. citizen stepparent. A stepchild is ineligible for citizenship or naturalization through the U.S. citizen stepparent, unless the stepchild is adopted and the adoption meets certain requirements (See Policy Manual Chapter 2, Definition of Child for Citizenship and Naturalization, Section C, Adopted Child).


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bot; citizenship; immigration; maga; nationality; trump; uscis; uscismanual
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 08/28/2019 1:08:58 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; bitt
Ping!

USCIS Policy Manual Update

2 posted on 08/28/2019 1:09:49 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Main initial take-away from this update:

Clarify that temporary visits to the U.S. do not establish U.S. residence;
Explain the distinction between residence and physical presence in the United States;

Should significantly reduce "birth tourism."

3 posted on 08/28/2019 1:11:27 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Next Step:

NO MORE BASTARDIZTION OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT!

Original intent of the 14th Amendment
Senator Jacob Howard (served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction, which drafted the 14th) clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by stating:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

https://www.14thamendment.us/birthright_citizenship/original_intent.html

Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, author of the Thirteenth Amendment, and the one who inserted the phrase (All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the States wherein they reside):

[T]he provision is, that 'all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.' That means 'subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.' What do we mean by 'complete jurisdiction thereof?' Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

Sen. W. Williams:

I understand the words here, 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,' to mean fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

https://www.14thamendment.us/articles/anchor_babies_unconstitutionality.html

Senator Jacob Howard states the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment published in the Congressional Record May 30, 1866.
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=11

We have, at a minimum, 3 different Senators who were involved in drafting the 14th Amendment, stating on record in Congress that subject to the jurisdiction can not, does not, apply to foreigners or aliens (even if here legally).

The only thing missing for correcting the wrong introduced in the 1960's, is political will. We must do the right thing, and return to original intent of the 14th!.

4 posted on 08/28/2019 1:12:14 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

U.S. laws allow children to acquire U.S. citizenship other than through birth in the United States. Children who were born outside of the United States to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth under INA 301 or 309.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If laws and forms are required for you to have citizenship or your parent(s) are foreign nationals and you are born with more than one nationality, you are by definition, not naturally a citizen.


5 posted on 08/28/2019 1:19:29 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Another day, another loophole closed.

This Administration has been working diligently.


6 posted on 08/28/2019 1:25:58 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

It’s impressive how much the President has managed to get done in the face of opposition from both parties.

They had us on the road to North Mexico and he is single-handedly trying to turn this bus around.

We need to give him a Congress that supports enforcement.
We will never get it from Bush League Republicans.


7 posted on 08/28/2019 1:40:26 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

IF you are here illegally then, you are visiting temporarily and unlawfully...

Problem clarified and solved


8 posted on 08/28/2019 1:49:42 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

“Should significantly reduce “birth tourism.”

BINGO. There was a Daily Mail article how Chinese and Russian pregnant “visitors” would time giving birth here intentionally. I know most green-card holders (I did previously) who religiously know the 6-month outside of the US limit. Heck, I personally know 2 who were not allowed back in the US for staying outside of the US past 6 months because they were warned not to..


9 posted on 08/28/2019 1:51:03 PM PDT by max americana (Fired ONE libtard at work at every election since 2008 because I enjoy it. I hope every lib die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

MAGA!


10 posted on 08/28/2019 2:18:29 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
The way that it's written, it is somewhat of a puzzle. But...

"Who This Policy Update Affects

This policy may affect children residing outside the United States who were born outside the United States...
"

And other conditions, of course. My point is that it doesn't affect children born in the United States.

11 posted on 08/28/2019 4:06:50 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

We also have to retroactively revoke all of the citizenship granted under false pretenses SINCE the 1960s.


12 posted on 08/28/2019 4:33:09 PM PDT by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Apparently this does not affect heels-up Harris. She’s still ineligible to be POTUS. But doubt she’ll make it to the primaries. What a nasty person.


13 posted on 08/28/2019 4:34:13 PM PDT by upchuck (If democrats would stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90% ~ h/t Mr K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
"Should significantly reduce "birth tourism."

How? Since it applies to: "U.S. government employees and members of the U.S. armed forces who are employed or stationed outside the United States"

14 posted on 08/28/2019 4:38:01 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
"Apparently this does not affect heels-up Harris. She’s still ineligible to be POTUS. But doubt she’ll make it to the primaries. What a nasty person."

She may be nasty but she was born in Oakland so she's eligible.

15 posted on 08/28/2019 4:40:28 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlo

neither parent a citizen bro


16 posted on 08/28/2019 5:00:19 PM PDT by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Such a nyasssssty woman. . . her and Ilhan “I Married My Bro” Omar. And Rashida and the Tlaib-an.


17 posted on 08/28/2019 5:01:36 PM PDT by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
If laws and forms are required for you to have citizenship or your parent(s) are foreign nationals and you are born with more than one nationality, you are by definition, not naturally a citizen

That isn’t true, and here’s my own case in point.

I was born in the England at RAF Lakenheath. My father is a U.S. citizen, but my mother is a British subject. I have both a British birth certificate, and a “Record of an American Born Abroad” from the Embassy.

I effectively have dual citizenship, although I don’t exercise my British, at one point I did use a British and American passports. The trick was that I couldn’t use the British one when arriving to or from a U.S. territory.

I believe certain countries, like the Philippines take a very different view if one of the parents is a Filipino citizen, and that there were some service who had a bit of challenge with getting their kids out of country.

18 posted on 08/28/2019 6:48:41 PM PDT by voicereason (The RNC is like the "One-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

Sorry, you’re not eligible to be President.


19 posted on 08/28/2019 6:53:32 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

I was born in the England at RAF Lakenheath. My father is a U.S. citizen, but my mother is a British subject. I have both a British birth certificate, and a “Record of an American Born Abroad” from the Embassy.


Intersting. The RAF has landed in Jacksonville FL. Bunch of them are training up ri,ght now on the new Boeing anti-submarine aircraft they will be getting next year. It was amusing to see those RAF air crew in their flight suits at my local grocery store today.


20 posted on 08/28/2019 6:54:11 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson