Posted on 08/17/2020 3:10:55 PM PDT by rx
In light of the 2020 US presidential elections, Trump admitted to denying funding to the US Postal Service (USPS), despite the mailing service’s proposal on Thursday of a new patent for a blockchain-powered voting system, which would make ballot casting more secure.
President of the United States (POTUS) Donald Trump had been reported by Forbes to have denied USPS’ funding in order to block mail-in voting, sparking rage from Joe Biden’s Democratic Party, who allegedly needs that money sponsoring to keep the post office rolling and the ballots coming.
With all this ongoing, the U.S Patent and Trademark Office presented the USPS’ official patent application, dubbed the “Secure Voting System,” which leverages blockchain technology to securitize the voting process and transmit the incoming ballots more efficiently and quickly.
(Excerpt) Read more at blockchain.news ...
There are no coincidences
THEY CAN ONLY WIN WITH FRAUD
(h/t euram)
If Dems are so concerned about mailboxes, why didn’t they condemn the burning down of Post Offices by BLM terrorists?
In Minneapolis alone, 3 Post Offices were burned to the ground during the “peaceful protests.”
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
WH EMAIL CONTACT PAGE https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
US CONGRESS SWITCHBOARD: (202) 224-3121
Any version of online / remote voting introduces unacceptable levels of risk for voter fraud. Only in person, with valid government issued id, and both parties constantly monitoring the voting process provides the lowest risk of voter fraud. Even that can be abused without proper controls.
Patent to implementation would takes years for the USPS.
The U.S Patent and Trademark Office presented the USPS’ official patent application, dubbed the “Secure Voting System,” which leverages blockchain technology to securitize the voting process and transmit the incoming ballots more efficiently and quickly.
Trump complained about the patent brought forward by USPS by saying that with a blockchain-leveraged voting system, there would be no confirmation and way to verify whether the voter inscribed on the ballot was actually the one casting the vote. Also, he said that after the ballot was sent, there would be no way to know whether the ballot was tampered with.
Nothing electronic is “secure” because the identity of the sender is assumed to the the voter. The best, most secure voting is done in person, with identification, and then marking - purple finger - to prevent double voting.
I thought CONGRESS Appropriated ALL FUNDS?? Did I miss something??
Blockchain is supposed to be very good, very secure technology. But I think it is too late, most likely, to roll this out for the 2020 election. Security needs to be meticulously tested, reviewed and re-tested. We don’t need any surprises in its use. and I am naturally suspicious because it came from a government source.
They are on a roll and licking their lips with anticipation...
Sometime the simplest solutions are the best: a finger in purple dye.
“....Nothing electronic is “secure” because the identity of the sender is assumed to the the voter. The best, most secure voting is done in person, with identification, and then marking - purple finger - to prevent double voting....”
THAT is the way it should be done and needs to be done.
=============================================
Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ...
Section 4: Vice Presidential–Cabinet declaration
Section 4 is the only part of the Amendment that has never been used.
It allows other executive officials to declare the President unable to do his job.
The Vice President must agree to do this.
Nothing electronic is ‘secure’
Just wait until we become a ‘cashless’ country.......
And who funded the programming? Soros? Gates?
That' right !!
Does anyone with an ounce of intellect believe anything that the media or the leftist losers and their supporters tell us? Anything???
I’ll just toss this in for giggles...
https://www.gao.gov/mobile/key_issues/us_postal_service_financial_viability/issue_summary
Holy merde.
The MadMaxiPad should have been locked up years ago.
But since it’s of the “protected species”, it’s given the upper level of “just-us”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.