Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China planning satellite constellation to "suppress" or destroy Elon Musk's Starlink
Hotair ^ | 02/26/2023 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 02/26/2023 4:25:10 PM PST by SeekAndFind

China planning satellite constellation to
(209 kilometers)

Someone should probably forward this to Elon Musk because it sounds like China is gunning for him, possibly in a quite literal fashion. The South China Morning Post is reporting that China has begun a space program that aims to put nearly 13,000 satellites into low-Earth orbit in the next four years. Most of these (but not all) will be communications satellites intended to create a global network to rival Elon Musk’s Starlink program. The Chinese claim that they’re trying to make sure they get their fair share of orbital slots, which seems harmless enough. But they’ll be doing more than just that. The announcement speaks of a plan to “suppress” Starlink (whatever that means) and possibly some even more direct attacks on SpaceX equipment.

Researchers say China plans to build a huge satellite network in near-Earth orbit to provide internet services to users around the world – and to stifle Elon Musk’s Starlink.

The project has the code name “GW”, according to a team led by associate professor Xu Can with the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Space Engineering University in Beijing. But what these letters stand for is unclear.

The GW constellation will include 12,992 satellites owned by the newly established China Satellite Network Group Co, Xu and his colleagues said in a paper about anti-Starlink measures published in the Chinese journal Command Control and Simulation on February 15.

Even if this was just a matter of space real estate, the explanation from the Chinese makes little sense. They claim to be ensuring that they have “a place in low orbit” and want to “prevent the Starlink constellation from excessively pre-empting low-orbit resources.” But as Douglas Adams once pointed out in the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, “space is big. Really big. You just won’t believe how vastly hugely mind-bogglingly big it is.”

Yes, we’ve dumped a ton of refuse into the orbital junkyard that now surrounds our planet and there are thousands of satellites up there. But it’s still mostly empty space and those birds are not close to being bumper-to-bumper yet. There would be room for two constellations of satellites with plenty to spare.

The announcement also says that China plans to “gain opportunities and advantages at other orbital altitudes, and even suppress Starlink”. Given the translation issues, perhaps that just means they plan to compete with Starlink for customers. But it might also suggest some sort of electronic interference with the Starlink satellites.

The final threat in the announcement appears to remove all doubt. It claims that “new weapons, including lasers and high-power microwaves, would be developed and used to destroy Starlink satellites that pass over China or other sensitive regions.

We’ve discussed this here in the past and the situation appears to be growing steadily worse. The United States has fallen behind China in the development of offensive satellite technology and it’s going to take time to catch up. (Assuming we ever do.) The Chinese have begun launching birds that are far more maneuverable for a longer period of time than ours and it is believed that some of them already have offensive weapons capabilities. Or they could simply choose to crash into one of ours. It doesn’t take much to knock out a satellite. And while China hasn’t threatened to take out our military satellites yet, it sounds as if they may use Elon Musk’s gear for some target practice. This is not a good situation and we need to get on top of this.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccp; china; elonmusk; musk; russia; space; starlink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2023 4:25:10 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Chinese claim that they’re trying to make sure they get their fair share of orbital slots, which seems harmless enough.

What's "harmless" about it?

2 posted on 02/26/2023 4:27:17 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

With all the junk up there its amazing we can launch things safely anymore.

The series “Planates” is going to become reality. Whole companies removing junk from space.


3 posted on 02/26/2023 4:28:54 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Go ahead.

Make Musk mad.

See what happens.


4 posted on 02/26/2023 4:30:27 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Go Elon, build more Tesla factories in China, the country you love so much.


5 posted on 02/26/2023 4:33:13 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So being silent to the CCP’s crimes and promoting bullshit for Taiwan didn’t buy him any protection, huh.


6 posted on 02/26/2023 4:33:14 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I strongly suspect that Elon can play “Rock, Paper, Scissors” much better than the Chinese Commies.


7 posted on 02/26/2023 4:34:43 PM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They first have to build launch capabilities near the capacity of SpaceX. SpaceX bought that with years of development of standardized components and systems amenable to mass production.

The only thing holding SpaceX back in re capacity is that they have already saturated the global commercial space for satellite launch.

A war-footing in space, with DOD funding, would permit expansion by orders of magnitude.


8 posted on 02/26/2023 4:40:48 PM PST by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
China cannot stand to allow free speech.

Elon Musk has shown he is committed to free speech.

9 posted on 02/26/2023 4:42:18 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For the American space pessimists I wonder if china has an unmanned space plane that can grab space objects at will and return them to earth.

The US does and has been using this secret space plane for quite some time. It also deploys an array of completely unknown objects.


10 posted on 02/26/2023 5:45:17 PM PST by lonestar67 (America is exceptional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The problem with China’s plan is they want to go to lower orbits than SpaceX. That would mean even more sats in lower orbits with even shorter life times. The reason SpaceX got the orbits that they did, is that no one could afford to put the number of sats in orbit like Musk did.

The next major cost savings that SpaceX has coming online is with Starship ability to put 100 tons of the new sats in orbit along with better point to point lasers and a new more efficient ion drive.


11 posted on 02/26/2023 5:45:55 PM PST by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"And while China hasn’t threatened to take out our military satellites yet, it sounds as if they may use Elon Musk’s gear for some target practice."

Well, he agrees with Bernie Sanders' boy, John Mearsheimer, about letting Putin take Ukraine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mearsheimer#Personal_politics

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4134104/posts

If we let the Russians take Ukraine, we might as well let Russia's ally, China, take over the Internet satellite business. Otherwise, they might nuke us. Besides, the Russians and Chinese don't eat babies the way our pro-defense politicians do.

Say goodnight, populism. I had such high hopes for it, but it turned out to be a strange meeting with a nasty aftertaste.

12 posted on 02/26/2023 5:59:08 PM PST by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My comment #12 did have some irony and sarcasm in it, BTW, but only about politicians eating babies (re. the Qtard syndrome, Putinistas, etc.).


13 posted on 02/26/2023 6:07:13 PM PST by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My comment #12 did have some irony and sarcasm in it, BTW, but only about politicians eating babies (re. the Qtard syndrome, Putinistas, etc.).


14 posted on 02/26/2023 6:07:13 PM PST by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

GW stands for Guowang 國網 meaning national network.


15 posted on 02/26/2023 6:49:01 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

16 posted on 02/26/2023 7:04:54 PM PST by Sertorius (A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
Go Elon, build more Tesla factories in China, the country you love so much.

This is how China become so big in defense because we in the West have built so much stuff in China but they are still behind the times.

China is acting out of character and they are about 10 years and maybe a little more in defense.

17 posted on 02/26/2023 7:51:37 PM PST by TheConservativeTejano (The Business of America is Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is no way that users around the world are going to choose a PLA internet system over Starlink, or OneWeb, or Lightspeed, or Viasat, etc.

The Chinese might use strongarm tactics on some of their Asian client states but even they have latitude.

If they want to build a big LEO system for their billion+ customers that’s nice. That will probably work. But outside their borders, they shouldn’t expect much. Starlink and others will still dominate.


18 posted on 02/26/2023 9:21:41 PM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jiim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeTejano

‘China is acting out of character and they are about 10 years and maybe a little more in defense’

10 years what?

Ahead or behind?

TIA

USA has been so nice we have said we do not want to militarize space.

China is doing it as fast as they can, and will use space to obliderate anyone else up there.

They are very clever and inscrutable.

They want to kill us and colonize our country .

They will not play fair, and we need to fight dirty too.

We need to do cyber neutering of their satellites .


19 posted on 02/26/2023 9:33:16 PM PST by Syncro (Facts and Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Which, when it comes to most people’s choice of what service they wish to use, is a VERY big deal. And can be played to the hilt.

One of the times when the correct moral posture and “it’s just good business” are a happy union, much like honesty in transactions.


20 posted on 02/26/2023 9:48:15 PM PST by Paul R. (You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson