Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats’ Bill Would Give The DOJ Veto Power Over State And Local Election Laws
The Federalist ^ | MARCH 07, 2024 | BRIANNA LYMAN

Posted on 03/07/2024 2:40:15 PM PST by packagingguy

Democrats want to strip states and local jurisdictions of their control over elections and hand power to President Joe Biden’s weaponized Department of Justice and its left-wing allies to override election integrity laws.

Sens. Raphael Warnock, Dick Durbin, and Chuck Schumer reintroduced HR 14, dubbed the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, on March 1, more than two years after it failed to make headway in the Senate after being passed by the House in 2021.

If the bill were to pass, it would enable the Department of Justice to “intervene anywhere in the country to overrule local or state authorities whenever the left alleges that changes in the laws could theoretically disadvantage minority voters,” as Jonathan Tobin explained in these pages in 2022...

Specifically, passing a voter ID law would “automatically trigger preclearance requirements,” subjecting a jurisdiction to DOJ scrutiny.

The Biden DOJ has made no secret of its views on voter ID. Attorney General Merrick Garland boasted earlier this week of the department’s efforts to challenge “voter ID requirements,” and the DOJ sued Arizona for requiring people prove their citizenship in order to vote by mail or in presidential elections.

Often, the DOJ works with left-wing groups in its efforts against voter ID laws. The department was scolded in 2012 after worked alongside the ACLU to object to a South Carolina voter ID law, as von Spakovsky pointed out.

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arrestgarland; chuckschumer; democrats; dickdurbin; doj; dojsedition; elections; enemieslist; raphaelwarnock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: gibsonguy

And once they pack the court, it will rule that the 2nd is null and void and a host of other things that the left has asserted all these years.


21 posted on 03/07/2024 3:48:18 PM PST by Dahoser (I finally figured out what to call him: Fakephonyfraudident Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

unconstitutional but they dont care.


22 posted on 03/07/2024 4:03:59 PM PST by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
Didn’t we fight a Revolutionary War to prevent chit like this?

For some of us, our ancestors did. America, today, has less fight - and probably the same percentage of Tories.

23 posted on 03/07/2024 4:06:08 PM PST by Empire_of_Liberty ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

No...we stopped being a Constitutional Republic during FDR.


24 posted on 03/07/2024 4:32:57 PM PST by rottndog (What comes after America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

The radical left doesn’t want to hear other peoples words out of their mouths.

The radical left demands that only THEIR WORDS are spoken out of others mouths.


25 posted on 03/07/2024 4:49:35 PM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna

That’s my point


26 posted on 03/07/2024 5:05:43 PM PST by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Haha! My bad. Sometimes the sarcasm does not compute with me until it’s pointed out. I should know better, this IS FR.


27 posted on 03/07/2024 5:10:18 PM PST by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Every candidate running for office has a right to due process.

In my mind that requires photo ID or other positive confirmation of identity, such as by sworn affirmation by a neighbor or relative with photo ID.


28 posted on 03/07/2024 5:11:35 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

“only 29 percent of California’s registered voters will turn in their [mail-in] ballots, falling below the current record low of 31 percent in 2012.”

“2022 saw a 33 percent turnout”

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/california-senate-polls-schiff-garvey.html


29 posted on 03/07/2024 5:13:31 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

The purpose of the secret ballot is to make it impractical for people to sell their vote.

Mail-in ballots defeat the purpose of ballot secrecy.

Mail-in ballots should only be allowed in cases where a person could not otherwise vote.

I believe ballot secrecy is required by international treaty.

“Article 25
Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions:
(a) To take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives;
(b) To vote and to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors;”

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights


30 posted on 03/07/2024 5:18:11 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

DemocRats have been ignoring the Constitution since the beginning. It is the nature of all governments to seek to centralize and increase their power.


31 posted on 03/07/2024 5:41:49 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants ( "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

That’s why they will pack the court first


32 posted on 03/07/2024 6:23:42 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

This is communism!


33 posted on 03/07/2024 6:57:45 PM PST by PrayAndVoteConservesInLibsOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Yes some think we’re done already. You haven’t seen anything yet.”

Exactly, we heap a lot of disdain on Manchin but he Senema ended up being the firewall. The rats had their SC committee seated and ready to go. We would have 6 more hard core rat SC justices right now were it not for those two. So yeah the next time the rats get all 3 hell will rain down.


34 posted on 03/07/2024 8:31:24 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Smells like TREASON and they even Published their Treasonous plan, ARREST THEM ALL


35 posted on 03/08/2024 5:58:12 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson