Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gunman Killed Deputy, Officials Say {Scumbag Beck killed Kuredjian}
L.A. Times ^ | 9/4/01 | KRISTINA SAUERWEIN and MARTHA GROVES,

Posted on 09/04/2001 10:23:34 AM PDT by tbeatty

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Preliminary autopsy and ballistics findings confirm that a Santa Clarita Valley gunman who held officers at bay Friday fired the shot that killed a deputy, Los Angeles County sheriff's officials said Monday.

The "likelihood" was that the fire was started by hot tear gas canisters fired by deputies through the window of the bedroom from which Beck was shooting, said Lt. Raymond Peavy of the Sheriff's Homicide Division. Investigators believe the fire started on a bed, Peavy said.


(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last
To: VRWC_minion
I'd love to hear a reply to Post #278. Do you admit that although the eventual findings may one day agree with the article posted here, this one has no factual basis and is in fact an attempt at CYA?
341 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: tbeatty
The ATF initially claimed they were serving a warrant for Beck impersonating a Federal Marshall. At least, that is what their spokesperson released to the media.

Mike

342 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Sealed warrants are used in cases of suspected espionage and where agencies don't want to reveal who their informants are (out of risk that their target will know they've been penetrated). Agencies do not serve sealed warrants on suspicion of impersonating a US Marshal or weapons possession.

What if it's true that Beck did once work for the DEA or as a spy?

343 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima, tbeatty
Who do you blame for the fact that in decent, normal society, BATF agents are less accepted than convicted murderers? I blame the BATF, and people like you

Ditto

Very well stated.

344 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226
The ATF initially claimed they were serving a warrant for Beck impersonating a Federal Marshall. At least, that is what their spokesperson released to the media.

You are very correct , sir. I was watching the live telephone interviews on TV and the ATF spokesman insisted the reason for the search was Beck's impersonation of a U.S. Marshal. I believe they then discovered exaggerating your career choice to your neighbor is not against the law.

In time for the ABC evening news the story changed to he was stockpiling weapons and later he was a convicted felon. I am very suspicious of the convicted felon claim because there has been absolutely zero supporting evidence for the claim, other than the claim of one of the agencies that participated in the fiasco. I suspect the felon claim is a CYA, however, I will reserve judgement until someone provides proof, i.e a state or county of conviction, a date of conviction, tme served, or any other detail that will permit me to confirm it.

345 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: supercat
That may depend upon how the warrant is "served". Oddly, none of the reports I've read made any mention of showing the actual warrant to Mr. Beck. If the police didn't actually show Beck the warrant, he was under no obligation to let them into his home. If they forced their way into his home despite that, he had every moral right to regard them as criminal armed invaders.

So, where does it say in the constitution that Mr. Beck is obligated to shoot at them ?

346 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
"Civilian" killers DON'T suck then? Or do they just suck to a lesser degree because cops are "SOOOOO SPECIAL!"?

prambo

347 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by prambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
You're still in there cheerleading for the BATF

I haven't read where Tbeatty give any support to the BATF whatsoever. Are my reading skills faulty ?

348 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
These late night dynamic entries have resulted in the death of innocent people. They should not be allowed under any circumstances.

The 8am ones do too.

349 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Agencies do not serve sealed warrants on suspicion of impersonating a US Marshal or weapons possession.

Not even to protect a neighbor ?

350 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Foul on Pappy, can't prove a negative.
351 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
" The more fundamental question is why is "amassing weapons" considered a crime?

It's not, unless one is a two-time felon.

Beck was a two-time felon. "

G. Gordon Liddy said it best, paraphrasing, "I, as a felon cannot own a gun. My wife does have an extensive collection".

352 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
close tags
353 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: honway
Thank you.
354 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I'd love to hear a reply to Post #278. Do you admit that although the eventual findings may one day agree with the article posted here, this one has no factual basis and is in fact an attempt at CYA?

One can deconstruct any event to infinity, that is what lawyers get paid to do. Heck, after listening to OJ's defense attorneys I could almost believe he was innocent. "If it doesn't fit you must acquit". Then when I remind myself of the whole context within which the event occurs, I snpa out of it. We can go on like this for ever. But I will take a look at it and the thread later.

355 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
font
356 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: tbeatty
They forward to the BATF for followup because they are the agency that handled it previously...The BATF had executed a search warrant last year with Beck without incident... They believe this one will be peaceful as well. The BATF, with the local Sheriff and U.S. Marshall arrive at 8 a.m. to serve warrant.

Sorry, but I call bullsh*t. There is too much manpower there for the ATF to expect it to go down peacefully. It is also far too petty of a crime to warrant all of that agency involvement. You did answer my next question however. The ATF WAS involved in his earlier arrests. Could it be that they entrapped him in an attempt to get him to inform on others. Why does this sound so familiar? Now Beck knew he was faced with either getting killed during an aggressive arrest, or the ATF conjuring up a special court with handpicked judges, prosecutors, experts and witnesses where he will be sentenced to 183 years for something that neither he nor anyone else knows is a crime. At least he got his girlfriend out.

It is obvious that you believe that a good agency image is far more important than truth & justice. We all can see the spin that you put on things. "Neighbors are...afraid he might be a chold molester or something." That is classic. It brought back memories of Janet Reno saying "we did it for the children". You are a good spinmeister. Also the way you villainize people who are not committing violent crimes pegs you for an ATF agent(if you're not, you should be). Saying he deserves 'a lifetime of "hide the salami" in the state pen' for nonviolent firearms possession shows alot about your disposition. It is obvious that you need to villainize others to justify your actions. You've got alot of hatred toward others.

"When you find a turtle sitting atop a fencepost you can be sure of one thing - he didn't get there by himself." Col. Jeff Cooper

357 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: tbeatty
What dynamic entry? What have you been watching? 5 BATF office jockeys showed up at his house at 8 am and asked to speak to him.

Please explain how it went from "five desk jockeys" to a SWAT Team drilling holes in the neighboring houses.

Are you saying five desk jockeys arrived at the door and Beck started shooting? The shooting started at the point of the dynamic entry, is my understanding. If you have better information, then please share it.

358 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Beck was a two-time felon

Can you direct me to or provide one shread of evidence that Beck was even a one time felon. Can you provide a conviction date, a jurisdiction, county or state? Can you provide a judge's name or information on time served, or in what facility the time was served?

If Beck was a felon, I am certain someone with your connections could provide a reference to at least one document that can substantiate that Beck was a convicted felon.

The only information suggesting Beck was a felon comes from the same guys responsible for shooting up the neighbor's houses, i.e. they lack credibility and the information they released is so sketchy and full of holes it is laughable.

Starting in 1990, Beck was sentenced to 12 years."It was not known how many years he ultimately served." It is unknown because it is a bogus account,IMHO, these guys are as incompetent at fabricating a cover story as they are at marksmanship.

If there was any specific information confirming Beck's status as a convicted felon, it would be in the public domain by now.

359 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #360 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson