Replies

You've got that right. The trouble is, what do we do about it, compromise? I don't think so. It is time to return to the standards for divorce that work for obvious reasons. A capitulation on the idea of equal rights for the new liberals is not the answer. What happened "between then and now?" Unsubstantiated findings and bad case law has effectively concealed the truth. The law hasn't changed, just the way it is applied (in the wrong situations).

"The trouble is, what do we do about it, compromise? I don't think so. It is time to return to the standards for divorce that work for obvious reasons. A capitulation on the idea of equal rights for the new liberals is not the answer. "

I agree with you 100%. Asking for a measly crumb like enforced visitation rights for men is just a rhetorical gesture on my part. Once someone admits that it's a good idea, they have basically admitted that divorced men - as a class - are denied access to their children out of sheer prejudice. Somehow, putting it on the table always seems to bring debate to a screeching halt.