Posted on 03/16/2002 8:03:22 PM PST by churchillbuff
March 17, 2002
Billy Graham Responds to Lingering Anger Over 1972 Remarks on Jews
By DAVID FIRESTONE
The Associated Press The Rev. Billy Graham, left, with President Richard M. Nixon at an evangelistic crusade in Pittsburgh in 1968. A tape of a 1972 White House conversation between them has angered Jewish organizations.
It seemed impossible, when H. R. Haldeman's White House diaries came out in 1994, that the Rev. Billy Graham could once have joined with President Richard M. Nixon in discussing the "total Jewish domination of the media." Could Mr. Graham, the great American evangelist, really have said the nation's problem lies with "satanic Jews," as Mr. Nixon's aide recorded?
Mr. Graham's sterling reputation as a healer and bridge-builder was so at odds with Mr. Haldeman's account that Jewish groups paid little attention, especially because he denied the remarks so strongly.
"Those are not my words," Mr. Graham said in a public statement in May 1994. "I have never talked publicly or privately about the Jewish people, including conversations with President Nixon, except in the most positive terms."
That was the end of the story, it seemed, until two weeks ago, when the tape of that 1972 conversation in the Oval Office was made public by the National Archives. Three decades after it was recorded, the North Carolina preacher's famous drawl is tinny but unmistakable on the tape, denigrating Jews in terms far stronger than the diary accounts.
"They're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff," Mr. Graham said on the tape, after agreeing with Mr. Nixon that left-wing Jews dominate the news media. The Jewish "stranglehold has got to be broken or the country's going down the drain," he continued, suggesting that if Mr. Nixon were re-elected, "then we might be able to do something."
Finally, Mr. Graham said that Jews did not know his true feelings about them.
"I go and I keep friends with Mr. Rosenthal at The New York Times and people of that sort, you know," he told Mr. Nixon, referring to A. M. Rosenthal, then the newspaper's executive editor. "And all — I mean, not all the Jews, but a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine, they swarm around me and are friendly to me because they know that I'm friendly with Israel. But they don't know how I really feel about what they are doing to this country. And I have no power, no way to handle them, but I would stand up if under proper circumstances."
Mr. Graham, who is now 83 and in poor health, quickly issued a four- sentence apology, but he did not acknowledge making the statements and said he had no memory of the conversation, which took place after a prayer breakfast on Feb. 1, 1972.
The brevity of the apology and Mr. Graham's refusal to discuss the matter further have angered many of the same Jewish organizations that for so long counted Mr. Graham as their best friend among evangelical Christians. The taped remarks have become the subject of synagogue sermons and columns in Jewish newspapers, with some Jewish leaders suggesting that Mr. Graham had hidden anti-Semitic views for decades.
"Here we have an American icon, the closest we have to a spiritual leader of America, who has been playing a charade for all these years," Abraham H. Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said in an interview last week. "What's frightening is that he has been so close to so many presidents, and who knows what else he has been saying privately."
Mr. Foxman urged Mr. Graham to return the award he won in 1971 from the National Conference of Christians and Jews — one of many such awards presented to him.
Yesterday, Mr. Graham's organization issued a longer apology, in which Mr. Graham acknowledged making the statements, but repudiated them.
"I don't ever recall having those feelings about any group, especially the Jews, and I certainly do not have them now," he said. "My remarks did not reflect my love for the Jewish people. I humbly ask the Jewish community to reflect on my actions on behalf of Jews over the years that contradict my words in the Oval Office that day."
Mr. Foxman subsequently issued a statement accepting the new apology, but for many Jews the damage had already been done. In a recent column in several Jewish newspapers, the Washington journalist James D. Besser said the remarks should awaken Jews to the intense dislike for them among many evangelical Christians, except insofar as Jews are useful to the fulfillment of Christian apocalyptic prophecies.
The tapes have been particularly disturbing to people and groups who have worked to find common ground between Jews and evangelical Christians, many of whom say that their progress has now been significantly set back. For years, Mr. Graham stood apart from other evangelicals in his refusal to proselytize Jews directly, sharply disagreeing on the issue with his own denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention. Because of that stance, the American Jewish Committee presented Mr. Graham with its National Interreligious Award in 1977, calling him one of the century's greatest Christian friends of Jews.
The taped remarks, however, will only help perpetuate the stereotypes that Jews and evangelicals hold about each other, said Rabbi Yechiel Z. Eckstein, president of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, based in Chicago.
"Jewish friends are coming up to me now and saying, `See, we told you so — they're all frauds,' " said Rabbi Eckstein, an Orthodox Jew who has become a liaison between Israel and evangelical Christians.
Mr. Graham's friends and biographers have tried to come up with some explanation for an act that so sharply diverges from five decades of almost universally admired public behavior. Lewis Drummond, the Billy Graham Professor of Evangelism and Church Growth at Samford University, a Southern Baptist institution in Birmingham, Ala., said he believed that Mr. Graham was referring throughout his conversation only to those few Jews he considered unethical for distributing pornography.
"There's not an anti-Semitic bone in his body," said Dr. Drummond, a longtime friend of Mr. Graham's who has written a book about him. Dr. Drummond recalled that Mr. Graham had always preached against intolerance, refusing — in the South of the 1950's and 60's — to hold his crusades in segregated auditoriums and inviting the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to join him in the pulpit.
Another biographer, William Martin of Rice University, suggested that Mr. Graham was thinking only of liberal Jews with whom he disagreed politically. Mr. Martin said that just as Mr. Graham grew up in a culture of segregation and moved beyond it, he had also evolved beyond what his thoughts were in 1972.
Mr. Graham's statement yesterday expressed hope that he had grown past his words that day in the Oval Office. Describing himself as "an old man of 83 suffering from several ailments," he said his life had been a pilgrimage of growth and change.
"Every year during their High Holy Days, the Jewish community reminds us all of our need for repentance and forgiveness," he wrote. "God's mercy and grace give me hope — for myself, and for our world."
If Jews are immune from criticism, where did you learn of their faults?
Well it certainly wasn't on CNN, MSNBC, or CBS or ABC or in the pages of Time, Newsweek or US News and World Report, although everyone knows these organs criticize the "Christian right" on a regular basis.
The truth is I had never heard of Jonathan Pollard or the USS Liberty until I started reading Free Republic.
I'm sure the same is true for many people.
Do me a favor. Before you go to sleep tonight, drill a hole in the side of your head, and then lay on one side so that the BS will ooze out.
Think that works? Am I alone in my feeling that these thread's about an honarable 84(?) year old man, nearing the end of his life, who made a mistake and repented for it, are distasteful and disrespectful?
International globalists, Bildegergers, Illuminati, Society of Rome, etc., it doesn't matter what they are called. They do exist, they do have a long stading agenda for establishing a one world goverennment and religion under their control, and they are patient.
Am I alone in my feeling that these thread's about an honarable 84(?) year old man, nearing the end of his life, who made a mistake and repented for it, are distasteful and disrespectful?
You're right. Graham probably didn't want the ADL all over him like a pack of rabid animals. So he did what he had to do.
Remember Abraham Foxman's original assessment? In typical ADL fashion, it was unmerciful. Foxman said that Graham was a purveyor of "age-old classical anti-Semitic canards."
Clearly, a tasteful, respectful comment about a man near the end of his life, right?
Do me a favor. Before you go to sleep tonight, drill a hole in the side of your head, and then lay on one side so that the BS will ooze out.
Good grief, going for the invective after just one exchange?
How about discussing the issues. Are Jews inordinately represented in the Media and Hollywood or not?
We obviously disagree on the man's character. Facing his God, you think he's motivated by fear of the ADL (not really, I know you have other unspoken issues), I respect his words. I respect the man, with little concern for what he said 30 years ago, and has disclaimed. How about another few posts, demeaning his motives? You aren't on this thread posting about Billy Grahm, are you?
Yes. Therefore what? Impose racial quotas?
You have no idea what you are talking about. And the comparison was a slur.
FYI, Here is a little history on your choice of the word bigotry.
Word History: Bigots may have more in common with God than one might think. Legend has it that Rollo, the first duke of Normandy, refused to kiss the foot of the French king Charles III, uttering the phrase bi got, his borrowing of the assumed Old English equivalent of our expression by God. Although this story is almost surely apocryphal, it is true that bigot was used by the French as a term of abuse for the Normans, but not in a religious sense. Later, however, the word, or very possibly a homonym, was used abusively in French for the Beguines, members of a Roman Catholic lay sisterhood. From the 15th century on Old French bigot meant “an excessively devoted or hypocritical person.” Bigot is first recorded in English in 1598 with the sense “a superstitious hypocrite.”
Also looking into the definition of bigotry you are faced with several for consideration. Taking the obvious meaning you have projected:
2. A person who regards his own faith and views in matters of religion as unquestionably right, and any belief or opinion opposed to or differing from them as unreasonable or wicked.
It sounds like Billy to me. He has publically admitted that the only way to heaven is through Christ. Thus in the true sense of the word, he is bigoted toward not just Jews but all others that do not believe in Christ. His mission is to save them from damnation and guide them into the grace of Christ, which means he loves them despite the fact they are wicked and of the world.
I would gather that he also knows that no man is free of sin, including himself.
I see that you have accepted his apology, which is good of you, do you also accept that Jesus Christ is the Son of God?
You don't really believe what you think you believe because you are spiritually unable or unwilling to repudiate anti-semitism like Billy Graham.
Really now, who is unwilling? I asked you a question, Instead of answering you asked me one in return and now you are assuming things in your knowing of what I believe.
Can you answer me please? It's a simple question. I promise I will answer yours in turn.
It's not just a claim when Graham admits it in his own words.
There are, in fact, a lot of Jews who believe it to be at least partly true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.