[AFA-Michigan]

---

E-mail Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and urge him to veto any attempt to repeal Florida's current law protecting children from the moral, spiritual, physical, mental, and emotional health hazards of homosexual adoption.

fl_governor@myflorida.com

---

[I_Love_My_Husband]

Rosie's just saying those things for PR because she wants to further the gay agenda; she wants mainstream America to accept this decision and be okay with it. However, we're not. And, like it or not I live in San Francisco and I'm horrified by this stuff. And I see it all the time. Think of Johnny Taliban, who's father ran off with another man (gay bathhouse owner), then Johnny went off the rails. It's all documented.

[herewego]

Thanks AFA- I used to say to each his own as long as it didn't affect me or my kids. Now with the fags adopting- May God help the kids. There is so much that needs to be done and I despise this feeling of helplessness because the rich lesbo,(and those like her) will never be held to the same mark as us. Keep your powder DRY and READY.... may change come soon...

[Dan from Michigan]

This is a state issue. The feds should stay out of it.

That said, I would not back this in Michigan.

[goldstategop]

Children are not ours to experiment upon or who exist to serve narrow adult agendas, like politically correct lifestyle fads. They're our trust and the future of society. For the reasons noted, they deserve to be raised in loving, traditional two gender family homes. Does that mean gays are discriminated against or disadvantaged cause they're not allowed by society to engage in reproductive behavior? Sure but then again homosexuality is a matter of personal choice and when one chooses to be gay, that person gives up certain claims for the good of society. Like the nurturance and the proper upbringing of children. All the more that there are instances in life when discrimination is not only salutary but a positive good for all concerned. And if its asked how it can be justified, it can be held to be done for "the children."

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Glossed over in the media's glorification of Rosie O'Donell's public announcement that she has sex with other women were these startling contradictions: O'Donnell's frank admission that she believes her own adopted children would be better off being raised by a married mother and father, bolstered by her hope that the children won't follow her example and engage in homosexual behavior themselves.

"Would it be easier for (my kids) if I were married to a man? It probably would," O'Donnell told ABC News reporter Diane Sawyer. http://www.drudgereport.com/mattro.htm

And when asked if she hopes her adopted children will grow up to be "straight"...

"Yes, I do," Rosie said. "I think life is easier if you're straight...if I were to pick, would I rather have my children have to go through the struggles of being gay in America, or being heterosexual, I would say heterosexual."

Thus the biggest conclusion Americans should draw from the Rosie O'Donnell confessional is this -- that Ms. O'Donnell is a privileged adult who put her own feelings ahead of what even she believes would be in the best interests of the children, and who used her privilege and wealth to place children too young to object in an environment that two recent studies indicate will make them more likely to engage in the very high risk behavior Rosie hopes they won't.

Rosie O'Donnell...

Everything about her is a lie. She is not a parent - - there are no children that are the product of her ovaries. She wants children but claims she is homosexual - - the desire to have children is a heterosexual desire. Rosie just can't make up her mind. By definition, homosexuals do not reproduce - - it is self-imposed sterility.

No person can ever have a "sex change." The use of the language has been so twisted by the leftist radicals, that in our touchy-feely world, many blindly accept some of these erroneous terminologies.

XX or XY chromosones can't be changed after conception when mitosis begins.

The physicians who do this type of cosmetic mutilation should not be allowed to practice medicine. The same goes for breast implants: instead of lawsuits against Dow-Corning, the doctors who implanted the silicone bags should be held liable...

"Homosexuals" are still genetically male or female.They are sterile. In genetics: XO (Turner syndrome), XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), XXX (poly-X syndrome), and XYY (Jacob syndrome). No matter how many X chromosones there are, any individual with a Y chromosone developes into a male. These abnormalities are so few, only one in thousands occur.

So much for the "gay" gene - - it does not exist. The reality of human reproductive biology smacks them hard across the face. There is no such thing as a homosexual parent. Homosexuals do not reproduce. Reproduction requires heterosexual interaction...

[ArGee]

Thus the biggest conclusion Americans should draw from the Rosie O'Donnell confessional is this -- that Ms. O'Donnell is a privileged adult who put her own feelings ahead of what even she believes would be in the best interests of the children, and who used her privilege and wealth to place children too young to object in an environment that two recent studies indicate will make them more likely to engage in the very high risk behavior Rosie hopes they won't.

That's what SADs do. They're developmentally challenged and cannot think as a rational adult. Therefore it is typical for them to put their "I want it now" approach to life ahead of anything else.

I still doubt if Rosie is really a SAD. I think she is suffering from low ratings and needed to do something to generate some buzz.

Shalom.

[xm177e2]

O'Donnell's frank admission that she believes her own adopted children would be better off being raised by a married mother and father, bolstered by her hope that the children won't follow her example and engage in homosexual behavior themselves.

"Would it be easier for (my kids) if I were married to a man? It probably would," O'Donnell told ABC News reporter Diane Sawyer. http://www.drudgereport.com/mattro.htm

She said it would be easier for them, not that they would be better off. There's a difference.

* “The probability of violence occurring in a gay couple is mathematically double the probability of that in a heterosexual couple,” write the editors of the National Gay & Lesbian Domestic Violence Network newsletter. http://www.afamichigan.org/releases/20010315a.htm

* The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that “people with same-sex sexual behavior are at greater risk for psychiatric disorders” – including bipolar, obsessive-compulsive, and anxiety disorders, major depression, and substance abuse. http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/issues/v58n1/abs/yoa9456.html

* The Institute reports that “significantly higher percentages of homosexual men and women abuse drugs, alcohol and tobacco than do heterosexuals."

These three might be explained in part because of the harassment and hatred homosexuals face in society.

[FormerLib]

...Ms. O'Donnell is a privileged adult who put her own feelings ahead of what even she believes would be in the best interests of the children...

Hardly surprising since homosexuals consistently show themselves to be the most self-centered people on the planet.

[Hildy]

I have to admit, I am very, very torn about this subject. If it is a choice between Foster Care and a priviledged homosexual household, I will take the latter. Sorry. And also, God I am going to be flamed for this, I know many gay couples who are smart, loving, witty and would bring so much love and devotion to a child. Whereas, I know may straight couples who are selfish, immature and bring children into destitute situations.

[Salman]

Children are just political cannon fodder to these people. You can see it in other issues too.