Yes, I thought the guy seemed odd, too. But certainly no more bizarre than a married couple who wife-swaps, uses drugs, doesn't bother to check on open doors and beeping alarm systems, and lies through their teeth under oath. Anybody who puts their own personal pleasure (including drugs and sex) ahead of the safety and well-being of their own children is far more likely to be a pedophile contact than someone who's putting up a reward to help them get back the child they lost through their own negligence.
Just curious how does not paying taxes for a foundation impact his credibility? He got the money. Does this situation apply to the BAIL BONDSMAN who put up money? Does it bring his integrity in to question? What must his motives be. Surely he works with less savory people. Besides the purpose of most foundations is that they are a TAX SHELTER, not a do-good institution, and you move your shares or cash in it when you need it. Generally they are not for profit institutions.