Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. Global Tax
The Liberty Committee ^ | 03/25/2002 | Ron Paul

Posted on 03/25/2002 12:02:37 PM PST by EBUCK

UN Planting the Seeds for a Coming Global Tax

April 15th is coming, and you’re getting ready to file your tax return. Throughout the year you paid federal taxes through withholding, including Social Security payroll taxes. You also paid state income taxes, unless you’re fortunate enough to live in Texas or another state without an income tax. You paid local property taxes. You paid local sales taxes every time you bought something, and you paid numerous miscellaneous taxes such as vehicle license fees and federal gas taxes. Like most people, you probably feel taxed to death by all these city, county, state, and federal taxes. Well, hold on to your wallets, because the United Nations now wants to impose a whole new level of global taxes on us.

The UN is meeting this week in Monterrey, Mexico to discuss exactly such a tax. The meeting is billed as a "Conference on Financing for Development," which is a nice way of saying it’s a conference to consider the best ways to shake down rich nations for money. UN bureaucrats think rich nations like America ought to give more money to poor nations- a lot more- simply because we’re rich. Never mind the billions of foreign aid tax dollars we send overseas every year; never mind the billions donated to overseas charities by Americans, the most charitable people on earth. The UN mindset blames the western world for poverty everywhere, assuming that our relative wealth must have come at the expense of the third world. The poor countries themselves are never deemed responsible for their own predicaments, despite their often corrupt governments, lack of property rights, and hostility toward wealth-producing capitalism. Somehow, it’s always our fault. So the UN holds conferences to talk about how we should pay to make things right, and the idea of a UN tax naturally arises.

Understand that the UN views itself as the emerging global government, and like all governments, it needs money to operate. The goal, which the UN readily admits, is to impose a comprehensive set of global laws on all of us- laws that supersede sovereign national governments. To do this, the UN needs a global military, a global police force, international courts, offices around the globe, and plenty of highly-paid international bureaucrats. All of this costs money.

Rest assured that the UN is absolutely serious about imposing a global tax. In fact, it has been discussing a global currency tax for years. The "Tobin tax," named after the Yale professor who proposed it, would be imposed on all worldwide currency transactions. Such a tax could prove quite lucrative for the UN, given the vast amount of currency that trades hands at certain times. It also might be a politically acceptable starting point, because most average people do not engage in cross-border currency transactions. A dangerous precedent would be set, however: the idea that the UN possesses legitimate taxing authority to fund its operations.

The Tobin tax is not the only idea being considered. Some have suggested taxing all airline travel or carbon emissions. The ultimate goal is an income tax, which will be imposed after we’ve all swallowed the concept of UN taxing authority.

The Bush administration thus far has been firmly opposed to any global UN taxes, and the State department has officially voiced our opposition. We should all be very thankful for that, because another administration might not have had the same response. It would be a mistake, however, to think the UN tax idea will go away. Some usually sensible nations like Britain and Germany support the concept, and the drumbeat for global government in general has been growing louder since September 11th. Hopefully, this latest bogus UN conference will make more Americans aware of exactly what the organization really intends, which is the imposition of worldwide income taxes. We need to focus the nation on how truly anti-American the UN is, to generate public support for a complete U.S. withdrawal from the organization. The history of the past 50 years clearly shows that our national sovereignty is incompatible with participation in the UN.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Free Republic
KEYWORDS: globaltax; nwo; ronpaullist; un; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Score one for Bush IMO. He may be bending us over on a lot of things but at least he's standing up for us on this issue.

EBUCK

1 posted on 03/25/2002 12:02:37 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: sixtycyclehum
Why, when SCOTUS can do his dirty work and rule it unconstitutional?
4 posted on 03/25/2002 12:12:32 PM PST by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Hickory
You got it. As long as their puppetiers do not want it. Evidenced again by the actions of this "Two-Party Cartel.
5 posted on 03/25/2002 12:13:23 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sixtycyclehum
I read that A1 sec. 8 allows congress to lay taxes for the genreal welfare ect.. It doesn't say to whom these taxes can be sent. Nor does it specifically note that those taxes cannot be sent to an outside "authority".

Talk about taxation without representation, if the U.N. were to actually get it's grubby little paws into our wallets like this.

EBUCK

6 posted on 03/25/2002 12:14:03 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Hickory
I'm sure that the vampires could find some way to pass the cost along to us.

EBUCK

7 posted on 03/25/2002 12:15:14 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: EBUCK
How about an amendment to the Constitution stating that US citizens will NEVER be forced to pay income tax to any international body??? Heck, add in domestic bodies, as well...
9 posted on 03/25/2002 12:17:58 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: ellery
Which ammendment is that?

EBUCK

11 posted on 03/25/2002 12:19:39 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Oh, never mind, I misread your post.

I would really hate to see an ammendment to that effect. We need the U.N. It does wonderfull things for us Americans. /Sarcasm

EBUCK

12 posted on 03/25/2002 12:20:47 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sixtycyclehum
And he's doing summersaults in his grave right now.

EBUCK

13 posted on 03/25/2002 12:21:28 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
The Bush administration thus far has been firmly opposed to any global UN taxes
Yeah. Right. Like he was against CFR. I don't trust him anymore. He's surrounded by advisors who are "calculating the demographics" of every issue and ignoring principles. And he's listening to them. Beware our President. He sold us down the river with CFR... he's capable of selling us down the river on this one.
14 posted on 03/25/2002 12:22:20 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Many Senators Won't Rule out Global Taxes
15 posted on 03/25/2002 12:22:58 PM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *UN_list;*Ron Paul list;*"NWO"
index bump
16 posted on 03/25/2002 12:23:32 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Don't ya hate the "thus far" bit?
17 posted on 03/25/2002 12:23:48 PM PST by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Not to worry. It won't happen until after the Rapture.
18 posted on 03/25/2002 12:25:45 PM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DEADROCK
Yes, I hate the "thus far". "Thus far" implies political convenience, not principle. Bush is capable of seeing 9/11 as a matter of principle, and I honor him for that. Gore would have flunked the 9/11 test. But what other principles has Bush demonstrated so far?
19 posted on 03/25/2002 12:27:20 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I'd never heard that he was against CFR, I thought he was a supporter from the git-go. I know he lied (and is still to this day) on the issue of amnesty but hadn't heard the CFR flop.

At least the rhetoric his admin is spewing is on our side on this issue. Hopefully he'll follow thru here.

EBUCK

20 posted on 03/25/2002 12:30:02 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson