Skip to comments.It Can't Be True, Government Schools Ban ... Musical Chairs?
Posted on 04/02/2002 6:01:49 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
click here to read article
On second thought, maybe it is good training. It teaches you that you'll have to kick some people to the curb in order to receive recognition. In a company like Intel with its 'normed' system of evaluation, you had better be able shove aside the lower 20%.
I am sincerely at a loss of words...Un-Phuqing-Believable!
Yes I have many fond memories of institutionalized education. The green two tone, insane asylum like color scheme, the prison like architecture. All fond memories.
What we did have as kids was tons and tons of kids to play with. Dozens. That was when there were a lot of families with 5+ kids. We had kick ball and dodge ball and kick-the-can and Red Rover. We had freedom to wander (as long as we were home for dinner) without our parents having to worry about us.We had penny candy!
I would not trade my childhood for all the trappings of today's adult-run, ultra-PC society.
Simon says, "Let kids be kids!"
In all of these activities, noone is "made" to be a loser, except by himself. Competition determines who, on any given day, is best at the competed activity. Repeated competition encourages losers to hone their skills, so that next time they might be winners.
Again these are artifical competitions. Sports does not equal life and its not really good training for life except perhaps for a corporation where workers must prance like trained dogs which comptete for the approval of the master.
It never bothered me to beat someone to the chair I was very competitive. But now that I hear it encourages exclusion, I am saddened that we are teaching children it is bad.
My husband comes home from work and actually MAKES the kids or the dog get out of his chair. I wonder if CPS or PETA should be called?
Who among you were in line, ready to jump into the swinging rope, when that bell rang? Who among you were just about to tag that last kid when you had to stop because of the bell?
Oh ---the despondency of it all! The crestfallen little kiddies. Their little psychies ruined forever because of unfullfillment. And all because of recess. Recess should join the ranks of Musical Chairs and remove that building block of childhood incompleteness.
How different than when most of US were young and our parents kept reminding us of how much better we had it than they did.
In God we trust, all others pay cash!
What planet are you living on? Last time I looked, about 93% of people in this country go on to work in corporate America after going to school and corporate America is based on competition for those who want to succeed, and mediocrity for those who just want to get by. This is the system, like it or not. The rich do get richer and the poor do get poorer, generally (not always) because the rich work harder at it. It may not be fair, you may not like it like that, but it is the way the world works.
The idea of a socialist utopia where there is no competition has been tried many times and it has always failed. The reason America works is because the competition is tempered with compassion. This is the most competitive society in the world but also the most generous.
Huh? "Prancing trained dogs?" Either you've never played sports, or you never worked for a large company, or else you done one, the other, or both and sucked at it. And believe me, I'm being kind, 'cuz the only other conclusion I can thik of is that you're an anti-corporate leftist who thinks big business is the root of all evil. The other conclusion is that you're goofing on us and I'm the one looking silly. It wouldn't be the first time.
Its amusing to see slaves defend the slave system.
You work, another profits. The rich are not richer because of them working harder or any other such virture. It is leverage. They leverage capital. They also leverage the labor of peons whom they have convinced to work for less.
Now as for capital being leveraged to earn more, damned straight, the more you have the more you can make no denying that. However the idea that the united states is merely a caste system where the poor are destined to remain and the rich are guaranteed individualy their control ad nauseum is truly foolish as well.
Only in America can an immigrant arrive off of a boat with nothing but the clothes on his back and be part of the middle/upper middle class through hard work in less than 20 years. Or move from lower to upper classes in a single lifetime. You may not like the system, and it has its flaws, but please don't try to characterize it as the devil it is not.
Competition in corporate America? Is that what explains the legions of executives of failing companies walking away with repriced options (repriced to still be above water even at todays depressed prices which is an insane thing to do from a stockholders or bond holders viewpoint), walking away with loan forgiveness + plus cash to pay for the taxes, walking away with millions of $$$ in bonuses? I refer to Kmart, Global Crossing, Lucent... there are many others...
The existence of class differences is more present than most people care to think. Rent the movie Gattaca which presents a stratified, class driven, Western society in its full expression. Then decide how much like that society are we today?
When I see the obscenity mouthing, fist pumping Tiger Woods, I'm confused as to exactly what beneficial lessons I'm to take from sports.
Classes exist in human society, always have always will.. but to promote the idea that western society is a hard core caste system if highly foolish. Go visit some of those asian countries where caste systems permiate their social and political structure then come back an try to alledge the US is in the same ballpark... I got news for you its not. And the concept that everyone can be forced to be equal such as communism are complete and utter failures and led to more elitism/peasantry than the feudal systems of the middle ages.
The fact remains, that in the US individuals are free to move through the classes upward or downward based on their personal desire and hard work (for the most part). I know people personally who are very wealthy but intellectually not even close to smart... but worked damned hard and earned everything they have gotten. I also know limosine liberals who have never worked a hard day in their life and live off their mommy and daddies, and I know people who have gone the other way from great wealth to great modesty.
Will most people in the US born to poverty become super wealthy? No. Will most people born to wealth end in poverty? No. But that does not mean that the paths are not open to it, and that people do not or can not do it, in fact the US is truly the most open society on the planet when it comes to an individuals socioeconomic destiny. In a true caste society such movements are impossible, no matter how much talent or ability or hard work those on the lower end have or exercise they never can improve their lot in life.
American grade and high school is the most bizzare exercise in unreality possible. It provides good training for the social conventions and for a clerial or industrial job, in a small town, in 1950!
Among those who play king of the hill, the one who makes it to the top finds the competition very fair and a legitimate rewarder of effort and training.
Now that would be a whole lot better than living in this horrible commetitive society where hard work, reason and trail and error come in handy.
Oh I get it, you want to change our system into a socialist system where everyone is equal and no one is a loser. Well then, lets just pitch this social and economic experiment called America. What a novel idea.
I'd be glad to. Show me one.
Is it me or did it seem like all the music teachers were sadistic,mean,cranky old hags that delighted in making the class as miserable as possible.I could never understand reading music and never passed it anyway.We had this 50 some German woman that cussed like a sailor and was mean as a snake,I always pictured her in a Nazi SS uniform at her house admiring herself in a mirror.
You sound like a very lonely person. We get your point, you don't like sports, you don't like competition, you don't like free enterprise, and likely don't like Tiger Woods. There is a cynical view of all things, and so be it.
Cynics are needed in this world, they give the rest of us good laughs. As the saying goes, life's a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.
Do you think it was because of your social origins, or your lack of motivation?
You might want to try homesteading in Alaska. No exploitation in the bush! lol
I, like Mr. Bergeron, fear you are having us on. ;^)
My husband is still steaming about Ten Little Indians now being Ten Little Airplanes. We have 3 grandchildren under 18 months and we're beginning to SEE with our own eyes what the liberals have done to childhood!
I have emotional scars from playing "War Ball" in high school (it's sort of like Dodge Ball on crack).
Yes labor away in your cubicle farms, you Borg drones, and look upon Tiger Woods and know that somewhere, for one person at least, effort is rewarded.
I don't like free enterprise you claim? Our enterprise is becoming less and less free. We live in mixed economy to be strictly accurate and the admixture of unfreedom is becoming greater all the time.