Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRANSCRIPT - President George W. Bush Middle East statement, April 4, 2001
MSNBC ^ | 4-4-02 | George W. Bush

Posted on 04/04/2002 8:05:19 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

President George W. Bush
Middle East statement

Thursday, April 4, 2002
Good morning.
       During the course of one week, the situation in the Middle East has deteriorated dramatically.
       Last Wednesday, my special envoy, Anthony Zinni, reported to me that we were on the verge of a cease-fire agreement that would have spared Palestinian and Israeli lives. That hope fell away when a terrorist attacked a group of innocent people in a Netanya hotel, killing many men and women in what is a mounting toll of terror. In the days since, the world has watched with growing concern the horror of bombings and burials and the stark picture of tanks in the street. Across the world, people are grieving for Israelis and Palestinians who have lost their lives.
       When an 18-year-old Palestinian girl is induced to blow herself up, and in the process kills a 17-year-old Israeli girl, the future itself is dying, the future of the Palestinian people and the future of the Israeli people. We mourn the dead and we mourn the damage done to the hope of peace, the hope of Israel’s and Israelis’ desire for a Jewish state at peace with its neighbors; the hope of the Palestinian people to build their own independent state.
       Terror must be stopped. No nation can negotiate with terrorists, for there is no way to make peace with those whose only goal is death.
       This could be a hopeful moment in the Middle East. The proposal of Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, supported by the Arab League, has put a number of countries in the Arab world closer than ever to recognizing Israel’s right to exist. The United States is on record supporting the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a Palestinian state. Israel has recognized the goal of a Palestinian state. The outlines of a just settlement are clear: two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. This can be a time for hope, but it calls for leadership, not for terror.
       Since September the 11th, I’ve delivered this message: Everyone must choose; you’re either with the civilized world or you’re with the terrorists. All in the Middle East also must choose, and must move decisively in word and deed against terrorist acts.
       The chairman of the Palestinian Authority has not consistently opposed or confronted terrorists.
       At Oslo and elsewhere, Chairman Arafat renounced terror as an instrument of his cause, and he agreed to control it. He’s not done so. The situation in which he finds himself today is largely of his own making. He’s missed his opportunities and thereby betrayed the hopes of the people he is supposed to lead.
       Given his failure, the Israeli government feels it must strike at terrorist networks that are killing its citizens. Yet Israel must understand that its response to these recent attacks is only a temporary measure. All parties have their own responsibilities, and all parties owe it to their own people to act.
       We all know today’s situation runs the risk of aggravating long- term bitterness and undermining relationships that are critical to any hope of peace. I call on the Palestinian people, the Palestinian Authority, and our friends in the Arab world to join us in delivering a clear message to terrorists. Blowing yourself up does not help the Palestinian cause. To the contrary, suicide bombing missions could well blow up the best and only hope for a Palestinian state.
       All states must keep their promise, made in a vote in the United Nations, to actively oppose terror in all its forms. No nation can pick and choose its terrorist friends. I call on the Palestinian Authority and all governments in the region to do everything in their power to stop terrorist activities, to disrupt terrorist financing, and to stop inciting violence by glorifying terror in state-owned media or telling suicide bombers they are martyrs.
       They’re not martyrs. They’re murderers. And they undermine the cause of the Palestinian people. Those governments, like Iraq, that reward parents for the sacrifice of their children are guilty of soliciting murder of the worst kind. All who care about the Palestinian people should join in condemning and acting against groups like al-Aqsa, Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and all the groups which oppose the peace process and seek the destruction of Israel.
       The recent Arab League support of Crown Prince Abdullah’s initiative for peace is promising, is hopeful, because it acknowledges Israel’s right to exist. And it raises the hope of sustained, constructive Arab involvement in the search for peace. This builds on a tradition of visionary leadership begun by President Sadat and King Hussein and carried forward by President Mubarak and King Abdullah.
       Now other Arab states must rise to this occasion and accept Israel as a nation and as a neighbor. Peace with Israel is the only avenue to prosperity and success for a new Palestinian state. The Palestinian people deserve peace and an opportunity to better their lives.
       They need their closest neighbor, Israel, to be an economic partner, not a mortal enemy. They deserve a government that respects human rights and a government that focuses on their needs — education and health care — rather than feeding their resentments.
       It is not enough for Arab nations to defend the Palestinian cause; they must truly help the Palestinian people by seeking peace and fighting terror and promoting development.
       Israel faces hard choices of its own. Its government has supported the creation of a Palestinian state that is not a haven for terrorism. Yet Israel also must recognize that such a state needs to be politically and economically viable. Consistent with the Mitchell plan, Israeli settlement activity in occupied territories must stop, and the occupation must end through withdrawal to secure and recognized boundaries, consistent with United Nations Resolutions 242 and 338. Ultimately, this approach should be the basis of agreements between Israel and Syria, and Israel and Lebanon.
       Israel should also show a respect, a respect for and concern about the dignity of the Palestinian people who are and will be their neighbors. It is crucial to distinguish between the terrorists and ordinary Palestinians seeking to provide for their own families. The Israeli government should be compassionate at checkpoints and border crossings, sparing innocent Palestinians daily humiliation. Israel should take immediate action to ease closures and allow peaceful people to go back to work.
       Israel is facing a terrible and serious challenge. For seven days, it has acted to root out terrorist nests. America recognizes Israel’s right to defend itself from terror. Yet to lay the foundations of future peace, I ask Israel to halt incursions into Palestinian-controlled areas and begin the withdrawal from those cities it has recently occupied. I speak as a committed friend of Israel; I speak out of a concern for its long-term security, the security that will come with a genuine peace.
       As Israel steps back, responsible Palestinian leaders and Israel’s Arab neighbors must step forward and show the world that they are truly on the side of peace. The choice and the burden will be theirs.
       The world expects an immediate cease-fire, immediate resumption of security cooperation with Israel against terrorism, an immediate order to crack down on terrorist networks. I expect better leadership and I expect results.
       These are the elements of peace in the Middle East, and now we must build the road to those goals. Decades of bitter experience teach a clear lesson: Progress is impossible when nations emphasize their grievances and ignore their opportunities. The storms of violence cannot go on. Enough is enough.
       And to those who would try to use the current crisis as an opportunity to widen the conflict: Stay out. Iran’s arms shipments and support for terror fuel the fire of conflict in the Middle East, and it must stop. Syria has spoken out against al Qaida; we expect it to act against Hamas and Hezbollah as well. It’s time for Iran to focus on meeting its own people’s aspirations for freedom, and for Syria to decide which side of the war against terror it is on.
       The world finds itself at a critical moment. This is a conflict that can widen or an opportunity we can seize. And so I’ve decided to send Secretary of State Powell to the region next week to seek broad international support for the vision I’ve outlaid today. As a step in this process, he will work to implement United Nations Resolution 1402, an immediate and meaningful cease-fire, an end of terror and violence and incitement, withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah; implementation of the already agreed-upon Tenet and Mitchell plans, which will lead to a political settlement.
       I have no illusions; we have no illusions about the difficulty of the issues that lie ahead.
       Yet our nations’ resolve is strong. America’s committed to ending this conflict and beginning an era of peace. We know this is possible because in our lifetimes we have seen an end to conflicts that no one thought could end. We’ve seen fierce enemies let go of long histories of strife and anger. America itself counts former adversaries as trusted friends — Germany and Japan and now Russia. Conflict is not inevitable. Distrust need not be permanent. Peace is possible when we break free of old patterns and habits of hatred.
       The violence and grief that trouble the Holy Land have been among the great tragedies of our time. The Middle East has often been left behind in the political and economic advancement of the world. That is the history of the region, but it need not and must not be its fate. The Middle East could write a new story of trade and development and democracy, and we stand ready to help. Yet this progress can only come in an atmosphere of peace, and the United States will work for all the children of Abraham to know the benefits of peace.
       Thank you very much.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushstatement; israel; middleeast; powell; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: hchutch
This appears to be a well-orchestrated day between the US and Israel. President Bush makes a speech back-handing Arafat and his Arab enablers, announces Powell will go to the region, all of the sudden the IDF comes up with a smoking gun on Arafat, Zinni gets the go-ahead to meet with Arafat, and finally Sharon says he will withdraw within 72 hours ... all within an hour and a half...
61 posted on 04/04/2002 8:54:52 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Thanks for the transcript. This speech and demonstration of leadership was needed, and serves to unite Americans and all freedom-loving people once again towards the ultimate destruction of terrorist organizations.
62 posted on 04/04/2002 8:56:24 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Damn it, George, just say it!!!
"Arafat is a terrorist"!!!

Arafat is indeed a terrorist, he always has been, he was a terrorist that was legitimized through years of negotiation for peace. The U.S. is partially responsible for that.

63 posted on 04/04/2002 8:56:28 AM PST by chuknospam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
My guess is that Zinni will ask Arafat to resign.
64 posted on 04/04/2002 8:58:22 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I heard all of Bush's speech, and it is amazing what the liberal news media chooses to use as headlines. The emphasis of this speech was the lack of leadership of Arafat, and he all but called him a bold-faced liar. His criticism of Israel, if you want to call it that, was asking Sharon to pull back a bit - GW gave full support to Israel. More pressure was put on the the Arab states, but you would never know that by reading the "mainstream media's" interpretation.

I loved his speech - it was forceful, consistent, and educational. Like my husband stated simply after watching the first Gore-Bush debate: "Bush is a leader, Gore is not". And this is one more example of his leadership.

65 posted on 04/04/2002 8:58:36 AM PST by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: semaj
Sounds to me that Bush is fed up with the current situation. It was a blunt warning to Syria and Iran that they had better cut off support to Hamas and Hizbollah, or else.

The world expects an immediate cease-fire, immediate resumption of security cooperation with Israel against terrorism, an immediate order to crack down on terrorist networks. I expect better leadership and I expect results.

When Dubya expects results, there is hell to pay if they don't materialize.

66 posted on 04/04/2002 8:58:39 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Damn it, George, just say it!!!

"Arafat is a terrorist"!!!

I think he was trying to leave a tiny crack open for Arafat to capitulate. The crack isn't very big, but it gives the Palestinians one final option to use Arafat to deliver peace.

Nobody, including Bush, is very optimistic about that, though.

67 posted on 04/04/2002 9:03:42 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: norton;Sir Gawain
SG - Yup, that was my take.

n - Even the Vatican went wobbly on that.

SG - P.S. - VeriCip O.K.'ed

68 posted on 04/04/2002 9:05:33 AM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RickyJ; Howlin
Well, this could well be a political speech where GW seems to be fair-minded regarding both sides. In the mean time Israel does what it's supposed to do.
69 posted on 04/04/2002 9:05:43 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Responsible Palestinian leaders??? And why should Israel halt incursions when the Palestinians are attacking them?

He's just keeping the Arabs off-balance. We're going after Saddam shortly.




70 posted on 04/04/2002 9:06:13 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo
Bush was shrewd - the IDF have already removed the worst of the lot. Bush gets to have his cake and eat it too. He has done more in a quarter that Cliton did in 8 years. Again he has proved his character and worth
71 posted on 04/04/2002 9:06:39 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
It was his best speech on the ME to date. It did several things:

1)It pointed to the Pali terrorists as the wrongful party

2)It requests Israel pull out of the West Bank

3)It clearly states Arafat has done nothing to stop terrorism and has ...BROUGHT THIS situation ON HIMSELF.

4)It advises Syria to "make a decision on terrorism

5)instructs Iran and Hezbollah "those who would try to widen the war.........to "Get out!"

It was a great speech and clarified what our policy IS, which had not been the case recently.

72 posted on 04/04/2002 9:07:07 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Yes, I guess you're right.
73 posted on 04/04/2002 9:08:26 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dales
That is what jumps out at me. I see a threat here- make your decision, terrorists or no terrorists. There will be consequences to the decision, so choose wisely. I am asking Israel to back off to give you room to make a wise choice. Now make the wise choice. Or else

My sincere question is - hasn't this been tried before? How many times has Israel come to the diplomatic table peacefully, only to have more murders of their civilians? What makes this current promise/threat by Bush any different?
74 posted on 04/04/2002 9:08:57 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Exactly. I just heard a guy on MSNBC talking about how Israel couldn't just "stop on a dime."

Watch the refugee camps.

75 posted on 04/04/2002 9:09:41 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Dales
See links for Israeli settlements below. I would suggest that our readers start to brief themselves on the extensiveness of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Golan Heights, becuase I do not think withdrawing from the settlements is as easy as one may think.

Click here
And click here
76 posted on 04/04/2002 9:12:14 AM PST by jerrymdss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
What could make it a difference is that GWB means it.
77 posted on 04/04/2002 9:15:16 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I'll try once more. See links for Israeli settlements below. I would suggest that our readers start to brief themselves on the extensiveness of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Golan Heights, becuase I do not think withdrawing from the settlements is as easy as one may think.

Click here
And click here If I messed the links up again, here they are: http://www.nimn.org/settlements/maps.html http://www.un.org/Depts/dpa/qpal/pal_maps.htm
78 posted on 04/04/2002 9:15:33 AM PST by jerrymdss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
I was moved by the President's remarks, and I hope things work out as he envisions. My only reservation was when he used the language of "occupation". That has become a very loaded word, used incessantly by the Palestinians to complain. I would have preferred more neutral language, like "disputed territories" or even "the land that will be the future Palestinian state".
79 posted on 04/04/2002 9:18:22 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
No, we're buying time to get ready to go after Saddam and Iran.

I've always pointed you towards the parable of the old bull and the young bull. This is one instance where it works.

The Israelis have enough smoking guns from the raid on the headquarters. Care to bet the CIA has copies of this, and are looking through their seven racks of computer tapes and disks (names Sleepy, Dopey, Happy, Bashful, Doc, Grumpy, and Sneezy, of course) and getting intercepts and items that corroborate those memos?

Arafat is toast, politically. The Arab nations are also going to be told very clearly that we expect the new Palestinean leadserhip to go after Hamas and other terror groups, and that they will have to help do that, too.

And, by the way, if Saddam or the Iranian mullahs so much as TWITCH the wrong way, they are toast. That will be the message to the Saudis and others. Sooner or later, one or the other will twitch, and they will be housed. I only hope we can build up a bit before it happens. For starters, we ought to bring back the CGNs and the Iowa-class battleships, but I think more than that will be needed.

80 posted on 04/04/2002 9:19:36 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson