Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dubya rattling my cage- again
4/25/02 | hoot33

Posted on 04/25/2002 4:07:47 PM PDT by hoot33

Cage rattled again - by Dubya yet !!

Hey gang - try this practical definition of an oft misused word ' equivocation '. I note it's related to compromise- usually in the worst sense IMHO. To wit -

After Dubya's visit with the Crown prince of Saudi Arabia, he held a solo press conference which hopefully most of you got to see/hear. All in all, Dubya acquitted himself very well EXCEPT in answer to a reporter's question, "Did you get the Saudi's to agree to public condemnation of terrorists murdering innocent civilians?". Even a simple 'Yes' would have been better than Dubya's answer! Instead, he said -paraphrase-

'The Saudi government has condemned, and continues to condemn terrorist killing of AMERICAN citizens' !! Pure equivocation!!

And he went on to praise the Saudis for their condemnation of the World Trade Center bombers and Saudi stated support for our war on terrorists. Words- words- words. As they met and spoke, the Saudis continue to finance and support terrorists - by our official definition!

Apparently it's like the TRIpotus(ex) stating (under oath yet)- 'It all depends on what 'is' is'! Guess to the Saudis, it all depends on what 'terrorist' means- to them 'freedom fighters?!'.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters
KEYWORDS: dubya; saudis; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Sent this to family/friends.
1 posted on 04/25/2002 4:07:47 PM PDT by hoot33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hoot33
Damn. Should've voted for Buchanan. He'd be protecting the Jews, sure!
2 posted on 04/25/2002 4:11:09 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
'The Saudi government has condemned, and continues to condemn terrorist killing of AMERICAN citizens'

Um, yes, I saw that condemnation telethon footage last week...

3 posted on 04/25/2002 4:11:16 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
Here we go again... Do we have to rattle the sabre every single time we perceive that Bush is not acting according to our every whim?
4 posted on 04/25/2002 4:12:15 PM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Damn. Should've voted for Buchanan. He'd be protecting the Jews, sure!

Heheheh.... BUMP

5 posted on 04/25/2002 4:12:42 PM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
For sure, that is exactly my thought.
6 posted on 04/25/2002 4:13:02 PM PDT by Texas Cornhusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
Does anyone really care. Nice, that you are in a cage!
7 posted on 04/25/2002 4:13:10 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
Bush left hickies all over the Prince's arse
8 posted on 04/25/2002 4:14:35 PM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: SunStar
Are the following whimsical?

Letting the criminal, treasonous, rapist Clintons off the hook- even blocking Judicial Watch's investigation(s).

Grossly defiling OUR White House and Oval Office w/o any consequence- except House Impeachment- cancelled by Senate.

Whimsical is hardly my characterization !!
10 posted on 04/25/2002 4:19:16 PM PDT by hoot33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
What do you expect? That's what you get when you have to vote for the lesser of two evils.
11 posted on 04/25/2002 4:20:19 PM PDT by Dark Watch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
"...even blocking Judicial Watch's investigation(s)."

A debatable point, but if true, is cause for me to doff my hat to the prez. Klayman's star is the wrong one to hitch upon.

12 posted on 04/25/2002 4:20:58 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
If Judicial Watch ever had something in actuallity, it wouldnt be blocked. They announce a new suit everyday and then it just gos away. They are clowns, who sue anyone and everyone.
13 posted on 04/25/2002 4:22:31 PM PDT by Texas Cornhusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
"we perceive that Bush is not acting according to our every whim"
"Whim".... good word. Many folk around here are determined to be dissatisfied. How tiresome.
14 posted on 04/25/2002 4:26:19 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Cornhusker
You need to be very careful what you say about Judicial Watch. Klayman's FR fiends will set themselves upon you for your blasphemy.
15 posted on 04/25/2002 4:27:24 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
The he$$ I will!!!! Maybethe President who knows what's going on and is a calm rational man, needs your myopic input!!!
16 posted on 04/25/2002 4:29:51 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Watch
Digger you change our name again?
17 posted on 04/25/2002 4:31:14 PM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texas Cornhusker
You know Larry Klayman asks me for money more often than my kids. Has he ever won anything ?
18 posted on 04/25/2002 4:41:43 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Here we go again... Do we have to rattle the sabre every single time we perceive that Bush is not acting according to our every whim?

Whim, no.

It is not a whim that I want our government to quit kissing Saudi ass. The Saudis HATE the USA and 15 of them proved it September 11th or did you forget??

LET THE SAUDIS EAT OIL FOR A WHILE!!!

They need us, not the other way around.

Eaker

19 posted on 04/25/2002 4:43:09 PM PDT by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hoot33
What a waste of bandwidth this post is.
20 posted on 04/25/2002 4:44:05 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson