Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Summary Evaluation of Arminian Theology" -- Dr. Paul Enns
Moody Handbook of Theology (Chicago, Ill.: Moody Press) 1996. | Paul Enns

Posted on 05/13/2002 10:08:33 PM PDT by drstevej

Summary Evaluation of Arminian Theology

Arminianism stresses a number of important features. The emphasis on man’s responsibility is surely a biblical factor: man must believe to be saved (John 3:16; Acts 16:31, etc.). If man refuses to believe, he is lost (John 5:40; 7:17). Arminianism’s emphasis on the universality of the atonement is also biblical (1 Tim. 4:10; 2 Pet. 2:1; 1 John 2:2).

Several features within Arminianism should be evaluated.

(1) Arminianism denies the imputation of sin; no one is condemned eternally because of original sin. Man is condemned because of his own sins. This appears at variance with Romans 5:12–21.

(2) Though variously interpreted, Arminians generally teach that the effects of the Fall were erased through prevenient grace bestowed on all men, enabling individuals to cooperate with God in salvation. There is, however, no clear indication of this kind of prevenient grace in Scripture.

(3) Arminians teach that the Fall did not destroy man’s free will; furthermore, they teach that prevenient grace moves upon the heart of the unbeliever, enabling him to cooperate with God in salvation by an act of the will. While it is true that man must bear responsibility in responding to the gospel (John 5:40), man’s will has been affected because of the Fall (Rom. 3:11–12; Eph. 2:1); man needs God’s grace in order to be saved (Eph. 2:8; Acts 13:48; 16:14).

(4) Arminians relate predestination to God’s foreknowledge of man’s actions. They stress that God knew beforehand who would believe, and He elected those. In Arminianism, election and predestination are conditioned by faith. The word foreknowledge (Gk. prognosis), however, is basically equivalent to election (cf. Rom. 11:2; 1 Pet. 1:20). The data of God’s foreknowledge originates in advanced planning, not in advanced information.

(5) Arminianism stresses human participation and responsibility in salvation: recognition of sin, turning from sin, repentance, confession, and faith. For Arminianism, repentance involves change of actions, forsaking sins, whereas the biblical word repentance (Gk. metanoia) means “change of mind.” Although the stress on human responsibilities is significant, if it involves multiple conditions for salvation, this stress becomes a serious matter because the purity of salvation-by-grace-alone is then at stake. The sole condition of salvation stressed in scores of Scriptures is faith in Christ (John 3:16, 36; Acts 16:31; Rom. 10:9, etc.).

(6) Arminianism teaches that believers may lose their salvation because the human will remains free and so may rescind its earlier faith in Christ by choosing sin. Frequently this view is based on controversial passages like Hebrews 6:4–6 and 2 Peter 2:20–22. The clear emphasis of Scripture, however, is that the believer has eternal life as a present possession (John 3:16; 1 John 5:11–13) and is kept secure by Christ (John 10:28) because of what He has done (Rom. 5:1; 8:1).


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: arminianism; calvinism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last
This summary will not doubt not please FR Arminians or FR Calvinists... but it does summarize the issues and offers some rebuttal. Paul was a member of my former congregation. He is a gracious godly man.
1 posted on 05/13/2002 10:08:33 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drstevej
The data of God?s foreknowledge originates in advanced planning, not in advanced information.
Huh?
2 posted on 05/13/2002 10:11:59 PM PDT by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
Paraphrase: God foreknows because He pre-plans. Foreknowledge means more that simple foresight.
3 posted on 05/13/2002 10:16:48 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that "arminianism" has nothing to do with "Armenians"
4 posted on 05/13/2002 10:22:10 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
You are right. Arminian has to do with Jacob Arminius [1588-1609]. His views and those of his followers, the Remonstrants, were a reaction to Calvinism. John Wesley later espoused views quite similar to Arminius.
5 posted on 05/13/2002 10:26:33 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Goldhammer
I think by "necessary" you mean "important."

If so, it is important in the debate over "free will" and "predestination."

No doubt subsequent posters may elaborate much more...

7 posted on 05/13/2002 10:34:16 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: drstevej
One of the quirks of history that one of the greatest Calvinist preachers of all time, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, got saved when he was witnessed to by an Arminian (a lay Methodist, at that).

If anything this goes to show that God plays no favorites.

9 posted on 05/13/2002 10:40:40 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
The question is whether salvation is a work of God alone [Calvinism] or whether man co-operates with God in the process [Arminianism].
10 posted on 05/13/2002 10:40:52 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"One of the quirks of history..."

===

Interesting phrase.

11 posted on 05/13/2002 10:42:54 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: drstevej
All advocates of predestination, from Lucidus to Calvin, have appealed to Augustine as their crown-witness, while Catholic theologians see in Augustine's teaching at most only a predestination to glory, with which the later "negative reprobation" to hell is parallel.

In actuality, Augustine is free from Calvin's idea that God positively predestined the damned to hell or to sin. The closest he might come to backing their theory is when he talked about "irresistable grace." The antithesis and the position of the words do not refer to the terms "inevitably and unconquerably" to the grace as such, they must be referred to the "human will" which, in spite of its infirmity, is, by grace, made "unyielding and unconquerable" against the temptation to sin.

13 posted on 05/13/2002 10:50:30 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
"But what does this have to do with free will, foreknowledge, predestination, etc?"

Calvinism teaches that God predestines some to eternal life based on no merit in them but merely out of grace. Calvinism further teaces that the elect believe as a result of God's producing new life in them. They are regenerated and believe. Arminianism taches that God predestines to eternal life those He foresees will respond to the gospel in faith. They believe and are regenerated.

14 posted on 05/13/2002 10:54:58 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
"Quirk" from man's point of view. As a "mild" calvinist myself, I believe it, just like everything else in world history, was arranged for by the Lord, yet somehow without forcing anybody to choose what they will choose. From all appearances, God likes to put quirks in history.
15 posted on 05/13/2002 11:00:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: JMJ333
Augustine is indeed a key figure for both Luther and Calvin. However, it was his teaching on the radically fallen nature of man was more foundational for Calvin than his teaching on predestination.

Augustine is free from Calvin's idea that God positively predestined the damned to hell...

Calvin's successor in Geneva, Theodore Beza, developes the doctrine of double predestination (which includes positively predestining the non-elect to damnation.

17 posted on 05/13/2002 11:03:07 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"From all appearances, God likes to put quirks in history. "

===

Indeed He does.

18 posted on 05/13/2002 11:04:27 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
Is there some debate or conflict that the doctrine in (#3) is supposed to resolve or address with respect to free will and foreknowledge?

===

Enns statement in #3 is that the biblical term "foreknow" means more than simple advanced knowledge. The debate over God's sovereignty is impacted by this issue.

Check the religion threads if you want to see the debate / conflict in "full flower."

19 posted on 05/13/2002 11:09:25 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer;Rnmomof7;Jean Chauvin;the_doc;xzins;winstonchurchill;the grammarian
I'll ping a few friends that will no doubt elaborate.
20 posted on 05/13/2002 11:12:30 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson