Skip to comments.
Ruling Upholds Firing on Basis of Religion
L.A. Times ^
| My 17, 2002
| MAURA DOLAN
Posted on 05/17/2002 5:10:51 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SAN FRANCISCO -- Religious institutions cannot be held liable for discriminating against employees on the basis of religion, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday.
The state high court threw out a lawsuit by an evangelical Christian who was fired from a Catholic medical foundation after he proselytized to other employees.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
05/17/2002 5:10:52 PM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
To: Bella_Bru
I don't get it? He worked for a religious company..... he was religious, and was fired for being religious at his religious work place? what did I miss?
To: Bella_Bru
Steven Drapkin, who represented a religious freedom organization in the case, said the decision shows that the court realizes that the "breadth of a religious organization's mission is not limited to houses of worship."
Let's hope they realize this in a non-selective manner.
3
posted on
05/17/2002 5:17:15 PM PDT
by
k2blader
To: k2blader
Preaching to the choir is wrong if you are not a member of that church. You could even get fired if you are an employee. Hmm. Seems reasonable.
4
posted on
05/17/2002 5:26:45 PM PDT
by
meenie
To: Bella_Bru
To: SouthernFreebird
I don't get it? He worked for a religious company..... he was religious, and was fired for being religious at his religious work place? what did I miss? What you missed is that he is from a more fundie cult than Catholism,and he was getting in their faces and telling them they were going to hell unless they converted to HIS cult. You have no idea how obnoxious these SOB's can be untill you have to deal with one yourself. Politely telling them you don't share their beliefs and asking them to leave you alone doesn't work. Neither does being rude and telling them to shut the hell up. Your only real option is to resort to violence,or the sincere threat of violence.
To: meenie
Preaching to the choir is wrong if you are not a member of that church. You could even get fired if you are an employee. Hmm. Seems reasonable. I agree.
To: Bella_Bru
This has more to do with capitalism than religion. One should be free to engage in commerce with whomever one chooses.
Unfortunately, if this lowlife was gay, he'd have won. I'll take any victory, however...
To: SouthernFreebird
You missed the fact that a religious organization does not have to provide a forum for a supporter of another religion to proselytize in. Would you be so confounded by this decision if that person was a proselytizing satanist or a wiccan? Or do you believe that all religious organizations should be forcibly opened to recruitment, by the courts, to any group regardless of their religious tenets? If so say good-by to freedom of religion.
9
posted on
05/17/2002 6:04:07 PM PDT
by
nomad
To: meenie
Simply hoping that if/when a Muslim employee is fired from a private Catholic organization under similar circumstances, the court will have the same opinion as below.
Secular employers can still be held liable for religious discrimination, but religions need "considerable discretion to choose employees who will not interfere with their religious mission," Justice Carlos R. Moreno wrote for the court.
10
posted on
05/17/2002 6:04:48 PM PDT
by
k2blader
To: nomad
Agreed.
11
posted on
05/17/2002 6:06:16 PM PDT
by
k2blader
To: SouthernFreebird
The correct dogma.
12
posted on
05/17/2002 6:15:25 PM PDT
by
RWG
To: sneakypete
Today's Statements from Sneakeypete:
FR has become the haven of group-think.
I don't think religion is bad,I think it is evil.
Sneakeypete has stated his distain for both the FR and religion, so he comes here only to agitate and disrupt. He has nothing helpful or intelligent to offer.
To: Thundergod
. He has nothing helpful or intelligent to offer. And how would YOU be in a position to determine either?
BTW,if you were bright enough to have checked,I've been around here a LOT longer than you have. Then again,if you were very bright,you wouldn't be you.
To: Thundergod
Sneakpete is not a disruptor. You've been here a month. You'll find that not everyone on FR is religious, and of those that all, not all are Christian.
To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Sorry about the repost.
To: SouthernFreebird
a patient objected that Silo had been "preaching" to him. Most employers have a strict 'no solicitation' policy. You don't go trying to sell another product (in this case, a denomination) to customers of your business.
To: sneakypete
Interesting how numbnuts has been here a month and can decide who is and isn't a disruptor, isn't it? Perhaps he was nuked under his old screen name and just didn't get the hit.
To: Thundergod
Why don't you get over yourself!!! Just who died and left you in charge?
If you weren't such a pompous ass, you might take it upon yourself to learn a little something about sneakypete, or any other FReeper, before you start pulling your BS game, newbie!
Wow! Got to tell some pompous ass off and use the word 'newbie', too!!!
19
posted on
05/18/2002 7:11:39 PM PDT
by
Rowdee
To: Thundergod
Are you Dan Morgan?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson