Posted on 05/26/2002 2:02:12 PM PDT by Willie Green
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. -- Weapons developer Terry Little was explaining plans for a guidance kit that could turn "dumb" bombs into "smart" ones when the Air Force's chief of staff asked about cost.
Caught off guard that day nine years ago, Little put the price tag at $65,000 a copy based on costs for other high-tech munitions.
Gen. Merrill McPeak, now retired, then asked for a cost goal.
"I made up a number right there on the spot of $40,000, which seemed like a nice round number," Little recalled.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
This IS progress! So many government acquisitions are hindered by superfluous rules and regulations that the paperwork generally outweighs the product. Like a company that is not "qualified" to be a government supplier because thay don't have the requisite number of triplegic martians working for them.
Don't ever blame the vendor because the toilet seat cost over $600 or the claw hammer cost $1200. By the time the vendor got "qualified" to sell to the gubmint, he had to go through a bazillion non-productive hoops.
Here with JDAM, some of the sorry bureaucrats are getting their noses rubbed in the fact that it's a lot cheaper to go down to Ace Hardware and plunk down $20 and walk out with a hammer.
Don't ever blame the vendor because the toilet seat cost over $600 or the claw hammer cost $1200. By the time the vendor got "qualified" to sell to the gubmint, he had to go through a bazillion non-productive hoops.That's not exactly true. The reason you have $600 hammers is that the Pentagon procurement procedures are a pain in the ass. But those procedures also allow the defense contractor to put all that paperwork into the price of the hammer, and so make a 15% profit margin on the $600. That's a lot better (for the contractor) than making 15% on $6. If the contractors could make a higher profit margin on more cost effective systems, they would make efficient rather than gold-plated systems. But as long as the profit is fixed and low compared to private sector systems - Cisco's profit margin on some routers approaches infinity - you won't get more success stories like JDAM.
What this allocation did was make the hammer relatively expensive while making the test sets a bargin. Ah, you say, let's buy only the test sets. Fine, but the allowable charges remain the same and are re-allocated only to the test sets meaning you don't save squat.
The Pentagon solved this problem by prohibiting the allocation of costs based upon the number of items and prescribed that allowable costs be allocated based upon the price of the item. Means more math, but the price of the tool kit is the same.
The $600 hammer is a great story but it is a story of misrepresentation of facts by a few democratic politicians more intent on slashing the defense budget and bashing Reagan that it was a story on the stupidity of the Pentagon.
I was an F-15/F-16 engine mechanic. Some of the special toolkits and test sets we had were extremely expensive. But standardized tooling - normal everyday handtools - the prices were inline or less than what you would pay in the outside world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.