The Chandra Levy Chronology (Update #11)

I think you've nailed the importance of May 1's timeline. Most Hill offices have a back door directly into the Rep's office so that they will not have to go through a public area--they can slip in or out at will. So his staff may not have been aware whether or not he was there at all--if that door between his office and the staff area is kept shut all the time--not an unusual thing. We don't know the mystery doctor, do we? So after 1:00, we really don't know his whereabouts. The evening is corroborated by Caroline--and how credible is she? When was he next seen--the following day?

I assume Condit gave Chandra the watch as she was seen wearing a man's Tag Heuer.

Condit had obsessive secrecy - his dating rules demanding that women go out with him carrying no ID and no money is very bizarre.

I think the Levy-Condit relationship was supposed to be secret. Remember, he denied it to the Levys and to the police for a couple of months after her disappearance.

Speculating about human nature, right before the police came over to search his apt., he dumped the watchcase that had a serial number that could be traced through McKay back to him. It is behavior that looks like he was trying to erase the connection between himself and Chandra. Why bother to do this, unless he knew Chandra had been murdered and the watch was missing, maybe somewhere in the bushes in the Park, pulled off in a scuffle? I think it likely he took both the watch and the gift-bracelet he gave Chandra, both of which are missing, because he didn't want anything traced back to him. This is in line with his general obsession with secrecy. Just my opinions.

Good thoughts about Condit's obsession with secrecy. And he is just plain arrogant! I think, though, that his concern with the watch could point to his not being involved with the murder. I'm not sure what to think at this point, but I think it's possible that he had nothing to do with it, that the story is much bigger than their affair and that he is trying to hide something else. If that does turn out to be true, then I still think he knows who did it.

Thats right. And her computer shows she visited several sites. A couple of days ago I heard a cop on TV say that no on said she looked up the mansion. The mansion is on the homepage of the Park web pages. Thats all. I think all the focus on the park and the common knowledge that other crimes were committed there is what gave the killer the idea to dump the remains there. For the past few months I had been hearing statements like"if only the family could have chandras remains back" or something like that. And then all of a sudden they find Chandra and someone from Condits camp immediately says"this will completely exonerate Condit". Now how do they know that?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.