Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critics rip plans for forced injections
Florida Times-Union Metro ^ | May 28, 2002 | P. Douglas Filaroski

Posted on 05/28/2002 10:37:44 AM PDT by Alan Chapman

Edited on 04/21/2004 9:00:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A state still reeling from anthrax attacks is quietly preparing to give health officials the power to quarantine and require vaccinations in a bioterror attack.

Despite civil rights concerns, Gov. Jeb Bush said last week he intends to sign a law expanding the powers of Florida health officials in declaring emergencies.


(Excerpt) Read more at jacksonville.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2002 10:37:47 AM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Alan Chapman
RE:"I've weighed the civil liberties issues against the needs for us as a state to be prepared, and I think I will sign," Bush said.
 
Translation: "You are all cattle."
3 posted on 05/28/2002 11:11:39 AM PDT by tomakaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomakaze
Or Orange Trees......
4 posted on 05/28/2002 11:24:34 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tomakaze
Translation: "You are all cattle."

Uh, make that cattle with no rights - period. What about people who may die as a result of such an injection (dangerous allergic reactions, for one?) Parents most often know what their child can and cannot tolerate. What if there's a conflict in such a case? The "health worker" better be darn careful.

This legislation needs further fine-tuning or people will die as a result of efforts to protect them. Not good.

5 posted on 05/28/2002 11:43:32 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: toddst
people will die as a result of efforts to protect them

Children die in this country from forced vaccinations and the dear old government still keeps passing more and more mandates. Most parents have NO idea of the deaths and permanent health damage from these vaccinations and thus go blindly along trusting in the government to know best. The same thing will happen with these new and improved gobermint powers IMHO.

6 posted on 05/28/2002 12:03:57 PM PDT by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Alan Chapman
It's a shame that this thread has not generated more response. Of course, there IS a Bush involved.
8 posted on 05/28/2002 2:33:32 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
It's a shame that this thread has not generated more response. Of course, there IS a Bush involved.

Yes, and the same Bush was involved in the Florida citrus outrage not long ago which involved gross violations of private property. And boy did the rank-and-file come out of the woodwork to defend it. Of couse, had it been a Democrat in charge the rank-and-file would've screamed bloody murder. Hypocrites. Are you familiar with the Florida citrus outrage (fruit canker)?

9 posted on 05/28/2002 2:54:55 PM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
"Are you familiar with the Florida citrus outrage (fruit canker)?"

Yes. And I'm one of the quieter ones on the Property Rights issues. The Feds are going to run into a hornets nest in short order along those lines.

Many feel that the sweat of their labors is not going to be subject to much more control.

10 posted on 05/28/2002 3:10:14 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Here comes all the chicken littles crying about our repressive government. My family will be glad to take our injections. The rest of you can die if you want to.
11 posted on 05/28/2002 7:16:23 PM PDT by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddst
The "health worker" better be darn careful.

The "health worker" is protected against prosecution or liability in these emergencies. If anyone dies then too bad. Just read the "fine print".

You're just sheep - deal with it.

/sarcasm

12 posted on 05/28/2002 7:28:35 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
I agree that they should not be forced to have injections. Just shot on sight if they are infected and wandering around in public because they exercised their “right” to endanger everyone else.
13 posted on 05/28/2002 7:32:14 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
The law would allow officials under certain conditions to quarantine and require vaccinations despite a person's health or religious concerns.

Hmmm. I would like to know where the vaccinations are derived from. If they're derived from the same source as these vaccines...then I have a problem. Do you know who develops the anthrax vaccine?

14 posted on 05/28/2002 7:37:14 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Well, I don't want to endanger anyone, but I do have specific religious beliefs--and I am aware that certain vaccines have been developed from the lung tissue of aborted fetuses. If you must shoot me, then I suppose that will be better than benefitting from evil.
15 posted on 05/28/2002 7:41:23 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mrfixit514
Have you heard of "Gulf War Syndrome"? FYI, the anthrax vaccine is a VERY dangerous injection and HAS cause numerous deaths.
16 posted on 05/28/2002 7:42:12 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Let me tell you something. If there is a bio-terror attack, there WILL be martial law. There will be shoot on sight orders for ANYONE that refuses quarantine or has refused vaccination OR other treatment that could have stopped your contagion. Neither religious beliefs OR your civil rights have meaning under those circumstances. That is no different than the shoot down orders for future hijackings.
17 posted on 05/28/2002 7:46:47 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Regardless, I would still be concerned if the vaccine is derived from aborted fetuses. I wouldn't want it because it is never permissable to benefit from evil at the expense of an innocent. I'm sorry that pisses you off. All I wanted to know was if anyone knew who made the product, so that I can discern for myself alternatives if I had to. Knock of your rabid behavior. I'm not an enemy.
18 posted on 05/28/2002 7:55:45 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
I am not "pissed"off. I am just stating that people have a choice and both choices have consequences. Tell me would your personal choice not to be vaccinated extend to your children( if you have any) as well?
19 posted on 05/28/2002 7:58:23 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: summer
ping
20 posted on 05/28/2002 8:06:39 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson