Think we should recruit some more Muslims to help us in the fight against terrorism?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Cyrano; Tennessee_Bob; Free Trapper; Crowcreek; Abundy; Gianni; Gun142; Son of Rooster; dorben...
ping!
To: Terriergal
Does it defy logic to claim that this person is of any use in the war against Islamic extremism?
3 posted on
06/02/2002 11:13:31 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: Terriergal
Once upon a time, there was a widely held belief that members of the Freemasons would never act against one another in any venue, civil, criminal, commercial, political, or personal. The idea gained support from a few lurid incidents in the 19th Century that could be interpreted unfavorably to the Masons. It resulted in an enduring distrust of anyone connected with the order, and a few ugly incidents where Masons were on the receiving end.
I'm certain there are Muslims who would call a "brother Muslim" to account for an offense against a non-Muslim. But the accumulating accounts of Muslims who hold brotherhood in Islam to supersede the demands of justice and all other obligations, as the abovementioned FBI agent is held to have done, is rapidly destroying the ability of non-Muslims to believe Muslims' integrity.
Two imperatives grow out of this:
- If you are a Muslim, and are willing to act according to the dictates of justice even if a Muslim is the offender and a non-Muslim is the victim, make sure your friends, neighbors, acquaintances and colleagues all know it -- especially the non-Muslims among them. Do your best to get other Muslims to affirm the same fidelity to justice. Not enough of you have gained a share of the public eye.
- If you are a non-Muslim, be careful what you believe. Be even more careful what accusations you make, and on what grounds you make them. The fate of many innocent persons might rest on your words.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
4 posted on
06/02/2002 11:22:02 AM PDT by
fporretto
To: Terriergal
This must be that "moderate Islam" I've heard so much about.
5 posted on
06/02/2002 11:23:40 AM PDT by
jonatron
To: Terriergal
For reasons of consistency, reliability and national security, these responsibilities should be assigned to a new federal anti-terrorism agency Very bad idea. That's all we need, yet another incompetent, unaccountable agency fighting over turf. No, we need to reform and rebuild the FBI.
6 posted on
06/02/2002 11:24:38 AM PDT by
Cicero
To: Terriergal
... The agent in question is quoted in two sworn statements, one by Wright and the other by retired agent Barry Carmody, as refusing to record the conversation because "a Muslim does not record another Muslim" ...
Will a Muslim investigate another Muslim? Or arrest another Muslim? If not, then Muslims belong in law enforcement like the Amish belong in the US Marines. We live in a secular society; either adapt yourselves, or excuse yourselves.
7 posted on
06/02/2002 11:25:10 AM PDT by
Asclepius
To: Terriergal
We should not be recruiting Moslems, but Arabic speaking people. Why are they going to mosques to recruit? It's nuts.
8 posted on
06/02/2002 11:31:02 AM PDT by
FR_addict
To: Terriergal
Recently there was a campaign to recruit agents from mosques in the NJ area, Whether or not they have deep-down symapthies for Islmist activities, the fact that in Islam faleshood and not honoring commitments are justified, even if its only under some circumstances, makes them unfir for such positions.
9 posted on
06/02/2002 11:37:05 AM PDT by
mikeIII
To: Terriergal
Here's what this bugger is really qualified for:
To: Terriergal
The agent in question is quoted in two sworn statements, one by Wright and the other by retired agent Barry Carmody, as refusing to record the conversation because "a Muslim does not record another Muslim." No, but there doesn't seem to be any shame in their game when it comes to flying a plane into a building which happens to house Muslims.
To: Terriergal
The agent in question is quoted in two sworn statements, one by Wright and the other by retired agent Barry Carmody, as refusing to record the conversation because "a Muslim does not record another Muslim." So Islamic nations don't believe in wiretaps? Tell that to the Kurds!
This line of reasoning sould be a lot of fun. Can ISPs in Saudi keep traffic logs? Will face recognition software ever be utilized in Iran? How do Arabic passports work? The mind boggles at the possible uses by defense counsel in a trial.
And we all know how much it would matter - some imam or judge would declare the defendant as an infidel, and then all manner of things can be justified for and by the government.
To: Terriergal
The muslim traitor will probably be promoted... affirmative-action, you know..... American-Muslims betray their country with their silence and inaction
To: Terriergal
Unemployed line up for benefits in Seattle after Boeing lays off.
Perhaps one of these people would like to trade places with
the FBI agent who apparently can't or won't do his job.
To: Terriergal
Instead of allowing Iraqi Republican Guards, and other Islama-losers into the US, we should actively recruit Christian Arabs from the Middle East.
They could be given citizenship in exchange for helping the FBI for a set number of years.
48 posted on
06/02/2002 2:49:59 PM PDT by
Mulder
To: Terriergal
Think we should recruit some more Muslims to help us in the fight against terrorism? Gasp! Profiling! you are guilty of profiling.... needless to say they are not guilty of letting muslims profile at the FBI in favor of muslims.... GASP!! (sarcasm)
To: Terriergal
Another example of extreme idiocy by the fed.
A white heterosexual bible-believing male can't get a job with these people because of a misdemeanor conviction, but they're hirimg people of questionable integrity that could very well be double agents. Brilliant move again, guys! How's Lon the 'accidental' Murderer these days?
To: Terriergal
So why don't we amend the Constitution to ban Islam in the United States. That way the Muslims can have their Islamic "utopias" elsewhere, and we can be free of the threat that each and every Muslim poses to the security of our nation.
Flame away if you must.
68 posted on
06/03/2002 7:33:05 PM PDT by
Siobhan
To: Terriergal
Any person whom does not give 100% for their Country forfits their right to live in that country.
Why is this Terrorist Mole still employed? It sounds that he wants Americans killed.
69 posted on
06/03/2002 7:42:28 PM PDT by
vannrox
To: Terriergal
Think we should recruit some more Muslims to help us in the fight against terrorism? Right after Tyson starts recruiting foxes to guard their henhouses.
To: Terriergal
"a Muslim does not record another Muslim."
And he's still employed???
74 posted on
06/04/2002 10:32:17 PM PDT by
brat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson