Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

H.L. Mencken on Abraham Lincoln
"Five Men at Random," Prejudices: Third Series, 1922, pp. 171-76. | H.L. Mencken

Posted on 06/20/2002 1:32:32 PM PDT by H.R. Gross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2002 1:32:32 PM PDT by H.R. Gross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
An Abolitionist would have published the Emancipation Proclamation the day after the first battle of Bull Run.

And resistance to the rebellion would have collapsed the same day.

Even after three years of war Lincoln said that giving up the support of the blacks would cause the loss of the war within three weeks.

Part of Lincoln's genius was in knowing what the country would accept, and another part was helping to guide it where it needed to go.

Walt

2 posted on 06/20/2002 1:38:13 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
and so leave him a mere moral apparition, a sort of amalgam of John Wesley and the Holy Ghost.

Sounds as though he didn't know much about John Wesley who went into more situations of personal peril than Lincoln ever did (and saved England from a civil war rather than causing one), though both of them did have demented wives. It is said that some men waylaid Wesley one night and said, "We be the devil's brothers" to which Wesley was to have replied, "Well, then, you know me. I'm married to his sister."
3 posted on 06/20/2002 1:41:01 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
The Union soldiers in that battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of their people to govern themselves.

I find this argument laughable coming from the slave holding states.

Hi Walt, looks like these idiots haven't given up yet!

4 posted on 06/20/2002 1:45:13 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheDon; WhiskeyPapa
I've heard of H L Mencken, but not of you two. Run those credentials again, for those of us who missed them.
5 posted on 06/20/2002 1:48:15 PM PDT by Treebeard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
My favorite quote from another thread:

It's time for another exciting episode of "The Tyrant Lincoln, Who Cut Down My Great-Great Grandma's Magnolias."

6 posted on 06/20/2002 1:50:34 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okchemyst
I see, so you don't agree that the South held slaves. I guess you just discredited yourself.
7 posted on 06/20/2002 1:51:24 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
I find this argument laughable coming from the slave holding states.

The southern states were right about self-determination and wrong about Blacks. Americans are now up to speed on the idea that Blacks are people, and as a result we can say that they too have lost on self-determination as a result of Union actions.

8 posted on 06/20/2002 1:59:17 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
Yeah, you can infer that from my post. With logical abilities like that, I bet you're a history professor.
9 posted on 06/20/2002 2:00:01 PM PDT by Treebeard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
"I find this argument laughable coming from the slave holding states."

You mean Maryland, West Virginia, New Jersey, Kentu... Oops, those were Union states. Sorry.

OK, I guess I'm not sure what you find laughable?

10 posted on 06/20/2002 2:02:40 PM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okchemyst
Your debating skills could you some help. By constantly attacking your opponent, rather than addressing the topic, you give the impression that you cannot address the topic to your favor. Are you a liberal? You can usually tell a liberal because not being able to engage in debate, they simply resort to attacking their opponent.
11 posted on 06/20/2002 2:05:21 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross; dighton; Orual
Dump.
12 posted on 06/20/2002 2:06:11 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OBAFGKM
I find this argument laughable coming from the slave holding states.

If you need a dictionary with some of the words, try www.dictionary.com.

13 posted on 06/20/2002 2:06:38 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
http://www.dixienet.org/dn-gazette/professors-sc.htm
14 posted on 06/20/2002 2:06:47 PM PDT by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
"If you need a dictionary with some of the words, try www.dictionary.com."

Your debating skills could use some help. By constantly attacking your opponent, rather than addressing the topic, you give the impression that you cannot address the topic to your favor. Are you a liberal? You can usually tell a liberal because not being able to engage in debate, they simply resort to attacking their opponent.

15 posted on 06/20/2002 2:10:33 PM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; stainlessbanner
fyi
16 posted on 06/20/2002 2:13:59 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
The Union soldiers in that battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of their people to govern themselves.

Well, actually only about 66% of the people in the south had the right to govern themselves but Mencken, being a professional curmudgeon, never allowed facts to slow him down when he was on a good rant.

17 posted on 06/20/2002 2:14:40 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OBAFGKM
Nice to know that no one can support the views of DiLorenzo, the Michael Bellesiles of Lincoln studies.
18 posted on 06/20/2002 2:22:32 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OBAFGKM
Nice try. It would score some points, except I was commenting on someone else's inability to respond to my point. I see you have nothing of value to contribute either.
19 posted on 06/20/2002 2:23:54 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
Don't forget that the Union had slave holding states too. Slaves states on the Union side were exempt from the Emancipation Proclamation.

Slavery was a minor issue in the Civil War.
20 posted on 06/20/2002 2:43:10 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson