Socialism = NAZI (Hitler was a socialist)

THE OMINOUS PARALLELS ^ | Leonard Peikoff

[freeforall]

FYI

[freeforall]

FYI ping

[freeforall]

Some should post this to DU and see what kinda reaction you get.Bump

[My Identity]

See also:
A Little Secret About the Nazis
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/630472/posts
They were left-wing socialists like the modern left of today

[freeforall]

Thanks.More reasons to post stuff like this to DU or some such place.

[Frances_Marion]

Excellent!

[KentuckyWoman]

To be a socialist", says Goebbels, "is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole."

And how many times here lately have we heard that "individuals must sacrifice some of their freedom for the 'common good"? I honeslty believe that this is why they no longer teach real history in the public schools. The last two generations along with future generations will have no knowledge of what has gone before and will, therefore, not be able to draw the parallels between the Nazi/Socialist/Communistic/Fascist regimes of the past.

[The Great Satan]

Peikoff's The Ominous Parallels is truly an object lesson in how to think systematically about politics and history. Highly recommended.

[goodieD]

Conservatives have often been called Nazis by the left. Pretty hilarious considering they have far more parallels to that ominous regime.

[Knight Templar]

Wouldn't Hitler have been a conservative, if the socialists
were in power. Expediency, any means to power. Power corrupts, blah blah blah.

[meyer]

Wouldn't Hitler have been a conservative, if the socialists were in power. Expediency, any means to power. Power corrupts, blah blah blah.

Sounds a little more like Hillary!?? to me. It seems that the natural trend with socialism is totalitarianism as the self-proclaimed elite garner an ever-increasing lock on the power and wealth through non-productive means while claiming its for the good of the "whole".

I surmise that to hurt the individual is to hurt the whole in the long term.

[Ohioan]

The Nazis were even to the Left of FDR, with whom they considered themselves to be in a form of competition to get to the New Order first. The only ones in Europe to the Left of the Nazis in the 1930s were the Bolshevik Communists. (See The Lies Of Socialism.)

The biggest of the big lies of pre-World War II Europe was that the Nazis were on the Right. That has been used by the Left ever since, to try to undermine the forces of tradition, but it was and is a lie. Patriots should counter it and other lies with The Big Truth.

I am very glad to see this article posted.

William Flax

[redbaiter]

Bump

[freeforall]

I think you can have different gangs of left wingers competing for the power of the state.They just call each other names but have the same goals.

[ppaul]

Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Worker's Party), NSDAP = 'NAZI' Party

[Prodigal Son]

Ahh, I see some positive comments. Try posting this again, same title but with the author also mentioned as the "intellectual heir to Ayn Rand" and see what sort of comments you get.

For my part- I agree with him.

[freeforall]

LOL!Yes but look at who endorsed this.

[ppaul]

...most probably the most important book written in modern times.

Most probably?

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Type, Democratic Socialists of America in your search engine, it is the democratic party, this they surely don't want folks to know as they coined 'liberalisim' as a if it feels good do it modern 'rights' feminists/minorities united. When it is socialisim. Thank-God America has awakened to this. And the ones with pea brains saw it in Hitlery rolling her eyes when the President was addressing the nation. She cares about nothing but HERself.