Posted on 06/27/2002 7:35:04 AM PDT by majordivit
Jihad kindergartens are not only a phenomenon of the "peaceful" PLO educational system. Satanic schools for hatred of the infidel and love of death in suicide bombings are a feature of life throughout the "peaceful" Muslim world. Even in well-to-do Islamic hell holes like "peaceful" Saudi Arabia, America's supposed ally in the laughable war on terror, Mohammed's most sophisticated modern-day followers think nothing of indoctrinating their offspring in the sweet delights of Jew-hatred and infidel-killing.
One film which recently managed to reach Western airwaves gives a fair sample of Saudi Arabia's jihad kindergartens. The May 7, 2002 episode from a Saudi television talk show called Modern Muslim Woman featured the hostess encouraging a little girl of three to spout her Islam-inspired hatred of the Jews. The interview was filmed by state-controlled Saudi television and broadcast to Muslims around the world.
HOSTESS: Are you a Muslim?
LITTLE GIRL: Yes.
HOSTESS: Basmallah, are you familiar with the Jews?
LITTLE GIRL: Yes.
HOSTESS: Do you like them?
LITTLE GIRL: No
HOSTESS: Why don't you like them?
LITTLE GIRL: Because....
HOSTESS: Because they are what?
LITTLE GIRL: They're apes and pigs.
HOSTESS: Because they're apes and pigs? Who said they are so?
LITTLE GIRL: Our [Allah].
HOSTESS: Where did he say this?
LITTLE GIRL: In the Koran.
HOSTESS: Right. He said that about them in the Koran.
Basmallah may be only a child, but she understands her Koran better than most Western adults, including most Western "journalists." Jews and Christians are "apes and pigs" to the faithful Muslim, just as they were to the demon-possessed pedophile who founded Islam. Anybody unwilling to accept this plain and simple truth has only to read Muslim bible in its own perverted words:
 |
|
|
|
|
Exerpt:Under a picture of George Sr. etc...........The elder Jew-hating Bush with Jew-haters Colin Powell and James "F*** the Jews" Baker
Exerpt: Under a picture of George Jr..............Bush wraps himself in the Israeli flag (December 11, 2001)(Washington's corrupt politicians will always side with the traitor multinationals)
Uhhhhhhhhhhh.............somehow they lost me with THIS stuff.
Without these Christians votes, Bush would have lost the 2000 Presidential race by a landslide and he cannot afford to forfeit their support when he runs for reelection in 2004.
However, Christian, Jewish and conservative supporters of Israel believe that the Democrats are even worse than Bush, and therefore he feels that he can keep their support even if they object to his betrayal of the Jewish homeland. He hopes to be able to make little Israel his sacrificial lamb and not suffer for it politically.
Bush knows that Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and other Christian leaders strongly disagreed with his father Bush Sr.'s viciously anti-Israel and anti-Semitic policies and yet still supported him for reelection in 1992 as the "lesser of two evils." The question now is why would Bush want so badly to get Israel to accept a suicidal "peace" plan?
The answer is that U.S. foreign policy is controlled by the traitor multinational corporations who finance both major political parties and who own the Bolshevik news media.
The traitor multinationals make a fortune dealing with America's Muslim terrorist enemies such as Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf oil sheikdoms. That is why we remain slavishly dependent on Arab oil imports when we could easily become energy independent by simply using our almost limitless supply of coal and shale deposits, as well as our abundant untapped oil reserves and nuclear power.
But the handful of multinational corporate giants would face competition from thousands of smaller American energy firms if the U.S. becomes energy independent. Ending Arab terrorist oil imports would eliminate the multinational corporate monopoly on our nation's energy supply. This is something the multinationals will fight to the bitter end.
The Arab oil sheiks warn that unless Israel is pressured to commit suicide, Arab oil imports will be disrupted. And if Arab oil imports are disrupted, the U.S. would finally be forced to become energy independent.
While this scenario of disrupting Arab oil imports and forcing America to become energy independent would be great news for the American people, it would be terrible news for the traitor multinational corporations. And whenever there is a clash between the interests of the American people and the interests of the traitor multinationals, the corrupt politicians in Washington -- from both parties -- always side with the traitor multinationals.
The Bush plan on the Middle East calls for the creation of an "interim" or "provisional" PLO terrorist state on lands which Israel has already surrendered. This newly independent PLO terrorist entity will then negotiate a further Israeli retreat to the suicidal pre-1967 borders, a retreat which must be completed within three years.
Once an independent PLO terrorist state is created, even if it is called "interim" or "provisional," it will be a catastrophe with devastating consequences for America and Israel.
It's not Bush bashing. They call it like they see it. They endorsed Bush for President in the general election of 2000...
I thought his points were quite clear:
1) Stop coddling Saudi Arabia, even if it pisses off the multinationals.
2) Do what must be done to lessen our dependence of Arab oil, even if it pissied off the multinationals.
3) Support Israel and don't support a Palestinian State, even if it pisses off the Arabs. If America doesn't side with Israel over the Arabs, we are screwed.
Do you have a problem with italics?
Yea, so. The group still calls Bush "Jew-hating" and "corrupt".
Let me clarify my position:
I pledge allegiance to the flag,
of the United States of America,
and to the Republic, for which it stands
One Nation, under God,
Indivisible
with Liberty and Justice for all.
Yes, of course I do when a poster copies 15 paragraphs from an article and still doesn't answer MY question.
Just in case you might have missed it in your rush to post.............my question was: "........and your point is?
You're right; I was in a rush to post (hence a few typos). However, I was well aware that your question was directed to someone else. I just have a distaste for that smirky little interogative phrase, "and your point is?". Don't take it personally.
Hahahaha! None taken! I just have a distaste for that smirky little interogative phrase "Do you have a problem with italics?". Don't take it personally.
Thanks for the explanation. At least we are both truthful as to where our respective priorities and allegiances lie.
Have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.