Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why July 4 is significant to Islamists
World Net Daily ^ | July 3, 2002 | Mark Robinson

Posted on 07/03/2002 6:09:49 AM PDT by Linda Liberty

On Sunday, one of the "experts" in the endless parade of experts on cable news stated the obvious: "I am unaware of any special significance of the date Sept. 11." His implication was that there is no reason to anticipate a terror attack on July 4 because bin Laden didn't use date significance as a basis for selecting 9-11. Although he was technically accurate, he was pretty far from correct.

Bin Laden is trying to raise the entire Muslim world to Jihad. Creating the mystique of the Chosen is central to his goal, and symbolism is the greatest weapon in his arsenal (thus far). Consider what he said (twice) in his post-Sept. 11 video: "… after 80 years, the sword has come to America …" He was clearly referring to the resolution passed by the U.S. Congress endorsing the partition of Palestine (creation of a Zionist homeland) on Sept. 11, 1922.

Experts on American news networks continually warn us that al-Qaida may be encoding secret messages to sleeper cells in their videos and communiqués, but bin Laden speaks openly, relying on us not knowing even our own history, let alone Islamic history. Which brings us to July 4. We, in our narcissism, assume that July 4 is all about us. But to Muslims it is a day of ultimate triumph.

On July 4, 1197, Saladin (Salah al-Din) completely annihilated the 20,000-man Crusader army at the battle of the Horns of Hattin, driving the "Christians" from the Holy Land until the 20th century. And we can be sure it is not lost on bin Laden that Saladin won this battle in spite of the fact that the Crusaders carried with them the "True Cross" (the True Cross was a relic designated by Constantine's mother during the initial phase of the paganization of Christianity).

Consequently, July 4 is a very likely candidate for a terrorist strike, albeit only if the Islamists feel they have the means to achieve a final victory over the U.S.

The first question is, do they? Recently, al-Qaida spokesman Abu Ghaith promised to kill 4,000,000 of us, referring to America as "Hubal." Hubal was the last and the largest of the 364 pagan gods in the Kaaba to be toppled by Muhammad (al-ilah, the predecessor to Allah, was left standing). The image of Hubal was so large that Ali (Muhammad's son and the first Imam) had to stand on the Prophet's shoulders to push it over.

The second question is, clearly, is bin Laden ready to stand on the Prophet's shoulders now? That really should be a role of the 12th Imam (Al Mahdi – the long-awaited Muslim chosen one who will convert the whole world by the sword). Maybe bin Laden has been hanging around a guy in really old clothes for a reason: Mullah Omar wears the Cloak of Muhammad (which he stole from a museum in Kandahar). We all know neither clothes nor symbols make the man, but in an eschatologically-based war, image and deeds together can be larger than life. Remember, most of Europe capitulated before Tiger tanks bearing swastikas and the mere idea of blitzkrieg.

It is reported that Bin Laden writes poetry in the style of Saladin. For bin Laden, defeating the Crusader army and knocking over Hubal on July 4 would be the stuff of which epic poems are made.


Mark Robinson is a scientist and author.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: binladen; homelandsecurity; islamist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Linda Liberty
On Sunday, one of the "experts" in the endless parade of experts on cable news stated the obvious: "I am unaware of any special significance of the date Sept. 11." His implication was that there is no reason to anticipate a terror attack on July 4 because bin Laden didn't use date significance as a basis for selecting 9-11.

OK - I'm wearing my tinfoil hat! But, on the night of September 11 I noticed that there was a crescent moon with a star next to it (venus?) - very, very bright. That is the symbol of the United Arab Emirates, if I'm not mistaken. I believe they perpetrated their act of terrorism under their symbol.

21 posted on 07/03/2002 6:42:42 AM PDT by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberSpartacus
One example is Christmas, Jesus was born in the spring (his dad was in town to pay his taxes which would have been in March.), not during the winter solstice December 25th.

That is absolutely true. Dec. 25 was the date for the traditional celebration of the Sun God, in the pagan world. Whether you called him Ra or Apollo, ir didn't matter. Dec 25 was your day to give thanks. The Christians appealed to Constantine to have a date on their own, and Constantine said: "You can use Dec 25. Take it or leave it." So the early Christians decided that if they gave presents to each other (symbolizing the wise men), they would be different from all those other people also celebrating on Dec. 25.

22 posted on 07/03/2002 6:43:47 AM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
OK - I'm wearing my tinfoil hat! But, on the night of September 11 I noticed that there was a crescent moon with a star next to it (venus?) - very, very bright.

What's your lat/long? I can research that.

23 posted on 07/03/2002 6:45:17 AM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
Thank you! I don't know my lat/long. but I live in Western, Pa - about 45 miles east of Pittsburgh.
24 posted on 07/03/2002 6:46:16 AM PDT by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Linda Liberty
On the other hand....truly historical dates are not planned.

They become historic after some deed randomly pans out on that date. The folklore is created ex post facto.

It seems to me that those who try to mimic history rarely make it.

25 posted on 07/03/2002 6:49:23 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Liberty
To blow a small hole in the 9/11 theory is an article I recently read, possibly in Time Magazine.

The FBI now theorizes that the attacks of 9/11 were hastily moved up to that date when Moussouai was arrested. They beleive the mission was moved up in case details of it were obtained through interrogation.

26 posted on 07/03/2002 6:50:18 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
On the other hand....truly historical dates are not planned.

Its a safe prediction that Fidel Castro will die on Cuba's greatest holiday.

27 posted on 07/03/2002 6:52:59 AM PDT by Linda Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: knuthom
Christianity has adopted a lot of pagan symbols which have no biblical origin. The most obvious ones are related to Easter and Christmas celebrations.

I'm interested as to what you consider pagan symbols in the Christian recognition of Easter?

29 posted on 07/03/2002 6:54:58 AM PDT by TwoBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Linda Liberty
My God, the base in Saudi Arabia!
30 posted on 07/03/2002 6:59:08 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep; RnMomof7; ArGee; Dakmar; EODGUY
ping
31 posted on 07/03/2002 6:59:12 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Liberty
"Al Mahdi – the long-awaited Muslim chosen one who will convert the whole world by the sword."
I don't suppose it ever occurred to these Satanists to try to "convert the whole world by the" TRUTH...and with the TRUTH...and to the TRUTH.

But then again, perhaps it did. TRUTH would mean the end of Islam.

32 posted on 07/03/2002 6:59:14 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
OK - I'm wearing my tinfoil hat! But, on the night of September 11 I noticed that there was a crescent moon with a star next to it (venus?) - very, very bright. That is the symbol of the United Arab Emirates, if I'm not mistaken. I believe they perpetrated their act of terrorism under their symbol

Ummmmm....no.

They perpetrated the attack in good weather. 9/11 had CAVU (clear air, visibility unlimited) from Boston to Washington, DC. You can get a fairly reliable weather forecast 3 days out and you can be sure they didn't get a final "go" till 3 days beforehand.

Had 9/11 been cloudy you can bet your bottom dollar we'd likely be talking about the "9/18" attacks.

Those attacks were heavily dependent on no low clouds. Thus, a physical impossibility for them to be scheduled based on some date in ancient history or some silly astronomical feature.

33 posted on 07/03/2002 7:01:33 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TwoBear
I'm interested as to what you consider pagan symbols in the Christian recognition of Easter?

One could actually argue that the Easter date calculation itself is a hold over from paganism. The official definition (used to this day is): (Gregorian Easter)

The FIRST Sunday AFTER The FIRST Full Moon AFTER the Spring Equinox

34 posted on 07/03/2002 7:03:47 AM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Other good ones are:

1) The media calls ANY military vehicle that isn't obviouly a jeep a "tank"......including APCs, AFVs, LAVs, etc.

2) The media calling any naval vessel..including frigates, cruisers, and destroyers, a "Battleship" (currently no battleships in active service anywhere in the world.)

3) The WORST one is the media confusing "casualties" with "killed" (this one is so bad I suspect over 50% of FR readers probably think casualty = killed); casualities refer to killed, WOUNDED (doesn't have to be mortal or even that badly wounded), and missing.

35 posted on 07/03/2002 7:05:02 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sneakers; John H K
OK - I'm wearing my tinfoil hat! But, on the night of September 11 I noticed that there was a crescent moon with a star next to it (venus?) - very, very bright.

At my location, the moon wasn't up on the night of September 11.

36 posted on 07/03/2002 7:07:16 AM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
I don't believe anything was moved up. 9-11 went off without a hitch. We were clueless. The date 9-11 was classic in the sense of history as someone had alluded (anniversary of the perceived to be revival of the crusades vis a vis the Congress vote on partitioning) as well as the well known emergency 911 significance. If your looking for fate and whose side it rests, chalk one up for the bad guys. I am quite concerned about another attack but don't see it to be some "rinky dink" operation in a crowd of people. They are going after the big hit. I see container ships in close proximity to refineries as the big risk. Chemical warfare using our own chemicals as the catalyst.
37 posted on 07/03/2002 7:14:42 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
Eh, it was visible, and a last quarter moon, but wasn't visible till after midnight.

Still, a moot point, as I've stated, because clear weather was absolutely critical; even with GPS, someone with a radio beacon at the target, etc., it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for them to hit either target with a low cloud deck, IMHO.

38 posted on 07/03/2002 7:15:52 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CyberSpartacus
re: in town to pay taxes.)))

A reasonable assertion...however, you tend to view this from modern times, which have more rigorous dates and deadlines, commincations and modern transportation. Even the Romans would not have expected so efficient a census-taking as you would suggest in March. Some scholars believe the family remained in Bethlehem after the birth for several months, even to a couple of years.

Can't deny that there are pagan tones to religious holidays. One of the holidays least associated with paganism is the Feast of All Saints...Halloween.

39 posted on 07/03/2002 7:16:33 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
They have little qualms about releasing horrible WMD's on mankind in general. They probably relish the idea that history could record them as having destroyed x-millions of humans.

If there's no one left to record history, did it really happen?

40 posted on 07/03/2002 7:19:12 AM PDT by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson