Posted on 07/10/2002 1:00:11 PM PDT by Kermit
Must be one of Janet Reno's ancestors...
Question: How can this be 2002 and we still have adults who still don't know the answer to this question?
The bottom line is the scientists have no real proof, just evidence. The great thing is, we can each believe what we wish!
You have got to be kidding. Why are you so afraid that the overwhelming evidence supporting human evolution will rock your world? It's okay. We evolved. Fit your Good into it somehow.
There are distinct differences between skulls from apes and hominids. Presumably there are enough characteristics in this find to allow the scientists to distinguish its hominid "status". Otherwise this wouldn't be described in such glowing terms.
There never was a logical reason to think there was.
Thank your God for courageous geniuses like Newdow. Were human advancement left to people like you, we'd not yet have figured out what to do with caves.
Doesn't it seem that in seven million years we should have advanced further than we have.
Is this the proof you've been searching for? Does it explain the vast differences between man and the remainder of the planets life forms? Could those who accept the notion of a creator believe that an infinite God could not create a billion year old rock or a seven million year old skull?
Well since it wasn't left to us, then human advancement has been left to people like you. Pray tell good Doctor why the human psyche hasn't evolved one iota in all these years. Why haven't we conquered the 7 deadly sins? On the contrary, we seem to be regressing into barbarity. Anthropologists seem to be consumed with the understanding of the physical development of man, but are strangely silent when it comes to understanding the spiritual condition of mankind. Surely one cannot divide the two.
We're not going to fall for the excluded middle any longer. Weren't you all over in Afghanistan sowing Existentialism in Taliban fields? The French Intellectuals SWAT Team. How'd that work out? Those Alqaida finally shrug their shoulders and give up?
What's the problem? If the ape is suited for his environment, and if his environment doesn't change, the ape won't change either. Ditto for sharks. Ditto for allegators. There's no law that says every species must change into something else.
Well maybe I am making an assumption but I figured that the ape experienced the same environment changes as man did and I would have expected at least some changes over the same time period. I also thought that man and ape had about the same abilities at one time. When man changed so many times while the ape never changed I find that confusing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.