Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The most important hearing never reported
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, July 18, 2002 | Jane Chastain

Posted on 07/18/2002 1:18:21 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

The most important hearing of the year was held on Capitol Hill last week on a critical issue this country faces today. No, you didn't hear about it because there was no press coverage.

The information that was presented was so damaging to the left that a petty squabble occurred over the ground rules. This kept the fate of this hearing in doubt until one minute before the witnesses were to be seated. As a result, the press was never alerted, which may have been the point. It was the Democrats' only avenue to prevent this information from getting out.

The hearing, on July 9, before the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works was on military readiness. More specifically, it dealt with the impact our environmental laws are having on the military's ability to prepare our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines for the battlefield. General John Keane, vice chief of staff of the Army, said the problems created by these laws are "formidable."

He used Ft. Bragg, where our Special Forces and paratroopers are trained, as an example of the nonsense that now is bringing the military to its knees. At Ft. Bragg, the Army has been ordered to protect all the trees, in which birds might have or want to build a nest. In effect, every tree – and trees cover the majority of Ft. Bragg's 130,000 acres.

"We have a 250 foot buffer around each tree," Gen. Keane explained. "There can be no bivouacking or occupation for more than two hours at a time, no use of camouflage, no weapons fired other than 7.62 and 50 caliber blank ammunition, no use of generators or riot agents, no use of smoke grenades, no digging – that's tough on an army – and no vehicles closer than 50 feet."

In short, the Army cannot prepare these men for the real world of combat. Can you imagine asking a firefighter to train without smoke and then sending him to fight a major fire? Can you imagine training a police officer without real bullets? That is tantamount to what the military has been ordered to do.

Keane told those assembled how hard it is to face soldiers dealing with the reality of that impact on them. "They are in places that they wouldn't normally be or at a time they normally would not be there, because you can't make noise in order to protect the [nesting] cavities." We are talking about birds and trees here! The soldiers can't make noise because it might offend the birds. Let's get real!

The problems related by Keane are not unique to the Army. Each one of the vice-chiefs of staff had made himself available for this hearing. Each echoed Keane's concerns and told his own horror stories.

Unfortunately, this hearing was not held in the Senate Armed Services Committee where it belonged. Why? The House of Representatives included two provisions in the Defense authorization bill that would give the military a little relief. Before they could be debated properly in the upper chamber, all four of the environmental subcommittee chairmen: Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., Bob Graham, D-Fla., and Harry Reid, D-Nev., wrote to Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., and asked him not to deal with them. These Democrat senators maintained that the proposals were outside of his jurisdiction and should come under Environment and Public Works.

Then their lackey, chairman Jim Jeffords, I-Vt., simply stalled the hearing on this critical issue until the full Senate passed the Defense authorization bill without these important measures. Jeffords' all-Democrat staff even pulled off those last-minute shenanigans to keep the hearing in doubt until the last minute. When the hearing finally was held, not a single Democrat senator even bothered to show up. Even those aforementioned sub-committee chairmen ducked this hearing, as did our former first lady, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

This not only was an affront to the vice chiefs of staff, it was an affront to everyone who wears the uniform of the United States military. It was an affront to the parents of those young solders who will die needlessly in the war on terrorism because they will be sent into battle without the kind of training they will need to survive.

I know why those Democrat senators didn't show. They didn't want to admit that they consider trees, tortoises, snails, seagulls – even microscopic shrimp – more important than the lives of the men we are sending into battle to protect us.

To borrow some words from Gen. Keane, "There is an ever increasing tension between the two national goals of protecting the environment and military readiness, and it is out of balance and out of whack."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enviralists
Thursday, July 18, 2002

Quote of the Day posted by Travis McGee

1 posted on 07/18/2002 1:18:21 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Isn't it about time the Prez issued some *%$#*! executive orders to do away with this enviro-BS?
2 posted on 07/18/2002 1:53:23 AM PDT by pariah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good morning, JHII. This needs to be e-mailed to Fox News until they cover it. Frequently and loud. I, for one, am tired to death with the Dems thinking politics is more important than the lives of our soldiers, sailors and airmen. I can't imagine why someone "official" hasn't raised a stink over this already.
3 posted on 07/18/2002 2:20:16 AM PDT by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pariah
A few enterprising staff officers should routinely and brazenly violate these laws "in the interest of national security"........see who bithces.

I'm sure not a single rat with utter so much as a whimper.

4 posted on 07/18/2002 2:28:41 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Talk about a Rush Limbaugh gold mine. This is it. I could imagine Hannity talking about this too. LOL! And who might have made this lunacy go too far? Could it be... oh... I don't know.... CLINTON?
5 posted on 07/18/2002 2:28:48 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Could it be...hmmmmm....BEE-EEZEL-BUBBAH?!?

6 posted on 07/18/2002 2:35:34 AM PDT by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Can we ever rid ourselves of this political correctness cr@p?
7 posted on 07/18/2002 3:10:32 AM PDT by Budge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pariah
An excellent idea! Common sense rules!!!
8 posted on 07/18/2002 4:39:35 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The generals should get together and write a letter to all the no-show senators. Perhaps something like this:

Dear Seantor xxxxx:
  War is an ugly thing. The best deterent to war is preparedness. In order to properly train our troops THINGS WILL GET BROKEN! You have fourteen days to save any particular plant or animal on ft. Bragg. After which time I will train my soliders as I see fit.

Have a Nice Day

9 posted on 07/18/2002 5:03:40 AM PDT by Joe Driscoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yakboy
Yakboy, who is the person in the photo? Thanks.
10 posted on 07/18/2002 5:04:29 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: logos
Trust me...the military brass is far too "PC" and chuck full of craeerism and CYA to put the priority of a low life grunt soldier in the way!

This sort of utter BS is gonna eventually get some troops KIA! Simulation and dumbed down training is dangerous...more than that, it is morally and ethically wrong!

Hackworth has been screaming this issue for years (OK, he is a bit self serving at times, but his logic and experience cannnot be ignored).

I'd love to have a squard of future SF/SOG/Rangers with me on a little trasining exercise...we'd be toasting terns, burnin' birch, and...lockin' and loadin' in wait for some PC, caeer protecting SOB to step up and have a chat with the way we train!
11 posted on 07/18/2002 5:15:31 AM PDT by NMFXSTC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe Driscoll
Ain't gonna happen, Joe...not from today's REMF, non-combat, careerist flag ranks!

If a general officer ISN"T aware of this mandate on his base...well...that says enough right there, eh?

So, you see, the styars and bars in today's flabby force simply do not want to "make waves"...

Oh for the days of Chesty, Hap, George....THEN, by God, we'd have one kick ass force (instead of the integrated, physical profiled,"can;t deploy because of child care" crap n hand now!)
12 posted on 07/18/2002 5:19:01 AM PDT by NMFXSTC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NMFXSTC
Yeah, I remember the days where an old-style field telephone meant a fish fry. Today's "perfumed princes" would go into apoplexy just spending one day with some of us "old soldiers". LOL!
13 posted on 07/18/2002 5:19:18 AM PDT by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
It's Dana Carvey as "The Church Lady". I always got such a laugh out of that character.
14 posted on 07/18/2002 5:53:15 AM PDT by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
BTTT
15 posted on 07/18/2002 7:27:37 AM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
all four of the environmental subcommittee chairmen: Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., Bob Graham, D-Fla., and Harry Reid, D-Nev., wrote to Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., and asked him not to deal with them...

...Then their lackey, chairman Jim Jeffords, I-Vt., simply stalled the hearing on this critical issue until the full Senate passed the Defense authorization bill without these important measures....

.....When the hearing finally was held, not a single Democrat senator even bothered to show up.

With an election coming up will the GOP go on the attack and make this public, or will they take their usual tack of keeping mum for fear of being called "mean-spirited" or accused of employing "negative campaign ads"?

The democrats do this sort of thing so routinely that there's always grist for the factual campaigning mill. That material goes unused for some reason when it could help republicans win big. Ever wonder why? I have.

16 posted on 07/18/2002 7:43:19 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
Index Bump
17 posted on 07/18/2002 10:37:35 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Fantastic article.

Bump!

(I am not really much into conspiracy theories, but if I didn't know better I would swear that some drudic, earth worshiping secret society has overtaken the worlds most powerful governments. )

18 posted on 07/18/2002 2:57:36 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Great article! BTTT
19 posted on 07/18/2002 3:23:39 PM PDT by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson