Posted on 07/23/2002 2:47:43 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
During a 1970s trip to the Havana General Psychiatric Hospital, a group of visiting American leftists were told that this hospital led the world in the percentage of its patients lobotomized. The leftists had already encountered "perfectly sane" homosexuals in the mental wards, because the Castro regime believed that homosexuality was a disease justifying commitment. Some leftists were horrified, and exclaimed that this "was exactly what were working against at home." But another retorted, "We have to understand that there are differences between capitalist lobotomies and socialist lobotomies." Reading his 2001 memoir, Commies, one wonders if the old left, new left, and left-over left characters Ronald Radosh describes might not have received "socialist lobotomies" themselves.Commies is the story of a "red diaper" babys evolution through a succession of leftist causes in post-war Americathe Rosenberg case, McCarthyism, Castro and Cuba, the anti-war movement, the Sandinistas, and on and on. Each "cause" represented yet another opportunity to convert America to socialism or Maoism or whatever intellectual fad was then in vogue on the left. Radoshs pedigree was impeccable; he attended schools and summer camps for "little reds" and inevitably drifted into that ultimate refuge for leftiesthe university.
Radoshs main "cause" was the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg atomic spy case. For Radosh and the left, the Rosenberg case was nothing more than a government conspiracy, with anti-Semitic overtones, to stamp out the left and bring fascism to America. Radosh does note the ambivalent stance of the U.S. Communist Party on this case initially. Still taking their direction from Moscow, the Party did not adopt the Rosenbergs cause until Stalin hit on the case as a way to distract attention from his own purge of "anti-Zionists" in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, particularly in Czechoslovakia.
Ironically, after Watergate, the Rosenbergs sons used the Freedom of Information Act to petition the government to release its records on the case. These newly declassified documents shattered Radoshs youthful illusions about their innocence, however, and set him on the path of rethinking many of the leftist myths that had guided his life.
His account of the importance of the Rosenbergs "martyrdom" explains much about the left. Leftists live according to a set of "myths." The Rosenbergs were framed, Ho Chi Minh was a nationalist patriot, Castro and later the Sandinistas would create humane, truly democratic governments. The only thing standing in the way of true progress is the American government and its corporate sponsors, which repeatedly prosecutes innocent people, suppresses national liberation movements, and despoils the environment.
Radosh observes that leftists spent most of their time putting out journals and newsletters. These journals and the leftist movement, in general, spawned several prominent players in the American media and, later on, a remarkable number of members of the Clinton administration. In his first term, Clinton intended to appoint Johnetta Cole as Secretary of Education. But she was soon identified as a leader of the Venceremos Brigades and a member of the U.S. Peace Council, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Soviet-run World Peace Council. Her most outspoken defender was Jesse Jackson, who claimed that the opposition to Coles appointment came from "Jewish complaints." Clinton eventually backed away from nominating her. Another leftist star, Michael Lerner, became Hillary Clintons guru during her "politics of meaning" phase.
One left-wing journal, In These Times, produced John B. Judis, now a senior editor of The New Republic, as well as Sidney Blumenthal, who became a Washington Post reporter. He later became Bill Clintons chief hatchet man with the media. Another left-wing star, David Gelber was the staff director for the massive Mayday 1971 anti-war march on Washington, before moving to network televison news. After a stint producing for Dan Rather, he ended up as Ed Bradleys senior producer at "60 Minutes."
And then there is Robert Scheer, contributing editor to the Los Angeles Times and The Nation, syndicated columnist, and senior lecturer at the Annenberg School for Communication. Scheers current bio omits some intriguing highlights, however. He visited Kim Il Sungs North Korean paradise and told Radosh, in a taped interview, that Kim had created a true path to socialism. Scheers views were too much even for Pacifica radio, which refused to run the interview. Scheer later became Wen Ho Lees staunchest defender.
The elite media didnt like Radoshs 2001 book. The Washington Post reminded readers that he went on to champion the "terrorist Contras in Nicaragua" and the New York Times snidely titled its review "Dont Steal this Book"a play on "Steal this Book," a volume written by Abbie Hoffman, another old lefty.
Notra Trulock is the Associate Editor of the AIM Report and a former Director of Intelligence at the Energy Department.
Yes. The socialist lobotomies are the ones that "take."
And, Notra, if you are hanging around old buddy...nice to see you out "amongst them"....keep on the trail.
Appears the radical left still is entrenched within our culture. They have the patience formed from decades of incrementalism. IMHO...Hillary's still behind all these scenes, still has 'her' players in the game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.